Guru
Ron Paul wins Debate in online Fox News poll, Fox removes poll without explanation
http://rt.com/usa/news/fox-paul-debate-poll-257/
The debate lasted two hours, and Fox only gave Paul 4 1/2 mins worth of time. He still managed to win their online pull, but they yanked it from their website with no explanation. It's quite obvious that they are threatened by him.
Are you a Ron Paul supporter?Originally Posted by Dr. Righteous
Guru
He WAS the only different candidate out there. Your choices have been for many years was for a progressive Dem, or a progressive GOP. Ron breaks that norm and the media is scared of it for some reason. Maybe because without the unfunded wars way off on goat herders the the left a right take part in, there won't be much controversy or trips to far off distant lands for them.
Liberalism; such great ideas, they need to force you to follow them.
Socialism is for the people, not the socialist.
2012 = Turd sandwich vs Giant D*&che
Analyst
I hope he wins nomination. I think he is a numbnuts but he has my sympathies because of how he gets treated by media. He will miserably fail in general election though, I like him for that too.
Last edited by Serlak2007; Sep 23 2011 at 02:46 PM.
If Jesus had a gun he would be still alive.
Guru
He is neck and neck with Obama. 39% Obama; 38% Ron Paul according to rassmusen. Don't really see him "failing miserably" like that.
What would Obama say, we should start bombing Iran to keep them from getting nukes? That will sit well with his base.
Liberalism; such great ideas, they need to force you to follow them.
Socialism is for the people, not the socialist.
2012 = Turd sandwich vs Giant D*&che
Banned
Guru
The establishment media’s relentless campaign to denigrate Congressman Ron Paul’s presidential campaign has manifested itself once again, after a poll showing Paul had won last night’s Orlando debate was pulled by Fox News who later published an article claiming Mitt Romney had instead claimed the victory.
When we took a screenshot of the poll at around 5am CST this morning, the result showed Paul easily beating his nearest rival Romney by 11,000 clear votes, with Paul at almost 40% and Romney trailing at just under 23%.
After our screenshot of the poll was posted on the ever-popular Drudge Report website, Fox News pulled the page that had previously housed the poll entirely. But the network went further, subsequently publishing an article by National Review editor and Fox News contributor Rich Lowry opining that Mitt Romney had in fact won the debate, thereby completely ignoring their own website poll, which restricts users to one vote per IP address.
Indeed, Lowry didn’t even mention Ron Paul once in his 13 paragraph piece, despite giving praise to Rick Santorum, Newt Gingrich, and Herman Cain – all of whom performed miserably in Fox News’ own post-debate poll. Ron Paul got nearly double the amount of votes in the poll than all three of them put together, but Lowry completely omitted Paul’s name from his report.
As we have previously documented, Fox News, even more so than the likes of MSNBC and CNN, have constantly undermined Paul’s campaign with dirty tricks, including playing the wrong audio of a crowd booing Paul at this year’s CPAC event.
See the results of the original poll before Fox News pulled it below.
LINK
Sr. Correspondent
Last check he's the only anti war candidate out there. Even Obama hasn't reduced overseas troop levels. I guess you're right. Our billion dollar war machine will never let a wacko like that get elected.
Guru
I think Ron Paul supporters have organized their online presence efforts better than the supporters of the other candidates. That doesn't mean it will translate to the overall voting public, however.
Analyst
Everybody and their brothers know that Ron Paul's anarcho-kook supporters are notorious about spamming polls. But you are right we feel threatened by that loon Paul, because his foreign policy would inevitably lead to totalitarianism.
Political correctness demands that Islam be thought of as inherently peaceful and tolerant, and no explorations of its history and doctrines that would lead to a contrary view may be presented.
Do heavy-handed tyrants—Saddam, Mubarak, Qaddafi, et al—create brutal societies, or do naturally brutal societies create the need for heavy-handed tyrants to keep order?
Banned
Guru
So are you saying you want the global bankers (Rothschild, Rockefeller, Bis, Royals, Vatican) to win again and move us more toward global slavery under UN AGENDA 21?
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks