![]() |
|
|
||||
|
http://www.freepress.org/departments...y/19/2007/2379
Election Issues First criminal convictions from Ohio's stolen 2004 election confirm recount was rigged by Bob Fitrakis & Harvey Wasserman January 27, 2007 The first felony convictions of two Cleveland poll workers stemming from Ohio's stolen 2004 election confirm that the official recount in that contested vote was, in the words of county prosecutors, "rigged." The question now is whether further prosecutions will reach higher up in the ranks of officials who may have been involved in illegalities throughout the rest of the state. The convictions have come down in Cuyahoga County, where Democratic candidates traditionally run up huge majorities. Suspicious vote counts and other irregularities cut deeply into John Kerry's margins in 2004. Official vote counts gave the state---and thus the presidency---to George W. Bush by about 118,000 votes out of 5.5 million counted. A statewide recount, paid for by the Green and Libertarian Parties, was marred in 87 of the state's 88 counties by the types of illegalities that led to this week's convictions. Only in Coshocton County was a full, manual recount performed. Throughout the rest of the state, under the direction of Republican Secretary of State J. Kenneth Blackwell, mandatory random sampling was not done, as prescribed by law. Instead, poll workers illegally chose sample precincts for recounting where they knew there would be no problems, and then routinely recounted the rest of the ballots by machine, rendering the recount meaningless. Blackwell simultaneously served as state co-chair of the Bush-Cheney campaign. This fall he was defeated in his campaign for governor by Democrat Ted Strickland. County Prosecutor Kevin Baxter opened the Cuyahoga trial by charging that "the evidence will show that this recount was rigged, maybe not for political reasons, but rigged nonetheless." Baxter said three election workers "did this so they could spend a day rather than weeks or months" on the recount. "This was a very hush operation." Jacqueline Maiden, the county election board's third-ranking employee, and Kathleen Dreamer, an assistant manager, have each been convicted of a felony count of negligent misconduct and a misdemeanor count of failing to perform their duties. Rosie Grier, the board's ballot department manager, was acquitted on all seven counts raised against the three. Sentencing is scheduled for late February. Defense attorneys have indicated they will appeal. The felony conviction carries a possible sentence of six to 18 months. The county prosecutors have not yet alleged vote fraud. No do they say mishandling the recount affected the election's outcome. Dreamer's defense attorney, Roger Synenberg, said the defendants "were just doing [the recount] the way they were always doing it." But Cuyahoga's precinct-by-precinct vote counts and turnout numbers varied wildly and improbably. Several predominantly black precincts showed turnouts of less than 30% in a county where overall turnout was around 60%. One ward showed a 7% turnout as compared to surrounding precincts with turnouts nearly ten times as high. Further prosecutions may now hinge on what Maiden and Dreamer might tell prosecutors about the role played by higher-ups. The assumption is widespread that the decision to consciously designate test precincts, rather than choose them at random, must have been at least tacitly approved by Secretary of State Blackwell. In Cleveland, Robert Bennett, chair of the state's Republican Party, also served as chair of the Cuyahoga County Board of Elections. Cuyahoga BOE Executive Director Michael Vu was chosen by the county Democratic Party. Under Vu's direction, the county's elections have been rife with chaos, irregularities and apparent fraud. When the Democrats recently tried to remove him from his post, Vu was supported by Bennett and the Republican Party. He kept his job when Blackwell strategically abstained from a key removal vote. There is growing evidence that what happened in Cleveland was the rule, rather than the exception, in Ohio's 2004 presidential recount. Sworn testimony at a public hearing in Toledo indicates Diebold technicians were involved in picking "random" precincts to be recounted there. A memory card was apparently lacking from at least one optiscan machines. Miami County election officials admit they merely ran the optiscan ballots through the ES 550 counter, rather than doing the prescribed random recounts. Free Press reporters have found recount results varied signficantly from official results, which should have triggered a hand recount of all the ballots in the county. This was never done in Miami or in any other Ohio County except Coshocton. Handwritten field notes from Paddy Shaffer, the Green/Libertarian Recount Coordinator in Delaware County in 2004, call into question the role played by ES&S technician Sam Hogsett. On December 15, 2004, Shaffer recorded at 2:42pm that Hogsett was "...tapping tabulator machine on left. There are two machines in the room. Kim [Spangler] says he is doing this because the light/the switch keeps going out. He has now handled the machines multiple times." At 4:25pm, Shaffer recorded "ES&S tech Sam Hogsett back on the machine and touching the ballots. They are working on Genoa precincts. My intuition is screaming get him away from the ballots and machines. ... He continued moving around the machines, stacking in the ballots." At 5:05pm Shaffer noted "Sam is back loading and stacking. Throughout much of this time, Sam is the one to call out the precinct total and the name." Sam Hogsett is more than an ES&S technician according to Shaffer and others who investigated him, who have found his letters to the editor quite alarming. Voting rights activists troubled by Hogsett's role in the recount found letters posted under the name Sam Hogsett, Crown City, at the southeatern Ohio newspaper website http://www.herald-dispatch.com. One of the letters begins as follows: "I recently read in this pitifully left-leaning editorial section that the spineless, thoughtless, moral less useless left-wing liberal America hater Robert Sheer is unsuccessfully attempting to use an apples-to-oranges comparison to wrongfully attack our Second Amendment rights." Hogsett goes on to write: "... He [Sheer] believes that if I were to take a Smith and Wesson and blast his little pea brain to bits, that his family should be able to sue the manufacturer and the gun dealer who sold it to me." Initially, Delaware County Prosecutor Dave Yost obtained a temporary restraining order stopping the recount in Delaware County on November 23, 2004. The Delaware Gazette noted a complaint from Shaffer about the role Hogsett played in the recount as a private voting machine company technician, and in a report dated January 1, 2005, Shaffer wrote the Delaware County Board of Elections that John Myers of the Delaware County Democratic Party said that, "He was very pleased that unlike many counties that are at the mercy of computer technicians, Delaware is not. He [Myers] said during both conversations, even repeated over and over, that they do their own programming. So why was Sam Hogsett needed? Why involve the technician in the process of the recount?" Board of Elections records in Fairfield County document that when the recount was not matching thus mandating a full handcount under Ohio law, the Secretary of State Kenneth Blackwell's office recommended that Sam Hogsett be brought in to deal with the discrepancies between the official count and the recount. After Hogsett arrived and took charge of the recount as a private ES&S technician, the vote matched perfectly for the first time. In Athens and Auglaize Counties, BOE workers who attempted to blow the whistle on apparent election irregularities were forced out of their jobs. Overall, the illegalities prompting these initial convictions in Cuyahoga County appear to be the rule rather than the exception in the handling of the Ohio 2004 recount statewide. The question now is whether parallel prosecutions will follow in other counties. And whether such prosecutions might include those who are likely to have ordered or approved the illegalities that marred the recount in Cleveland, and throughout the rest of the state. -- Bob Fitrakis and Harvey Wasserman are co-authors of HOW THE GOP STOLE AMERICA'S 2004 ELECTION & IS RIGGING 2008 (http://www.freepress.org/), and, with Steve Rosenfeld, of WHAT HAPPENED IN OHIO?, published by the New Press. WOOHOOO!!! Great news!! FINALLY a couple of convictions! The wheels of justice sure move slowly, don't they? There will be more to come. Rep. Conyers is pressing forward with information about Monika Goodling's testimony about caging lists. Raging Caging - What the heck is vote caging, and why should we care? Griffin, known as "Rove's brain" has just resigned. US Attorney resigns following Conyers’ request for BBC documents Greg Palast just turned over to John Conyers 50 missing emails from the thousands Rove/Cheney/Gonzales claim are missing. Those emails are caging lists for mostly black voters whose votes were blocked. In just these 50 emails alone, there are 70,000 names of Florida residents who were falsely blocked from having their votes count. If you don't like the way someone votes, just find a way to negate their vote! That's Republican "values" for you. Of course, it's a felony. |
| Sponsored Links |
| Red Cross - Donate Today Save the Rainforest |
|
||||
|
Quote:
You lost, get over it, and quit telling lies. http://rangevoting.org/OhioConvictns.html CLEVELAND – Two election workers were convicted Wednesday of manipulating a recount of the 2004 U.S. presidential election to avoid a more thorough ballot review in Ohio's most populous county. Ohio gave U.S. President George W. Bush the electoral votes he needed to defeat Democratic Senator John Kerry in the close election and hold on to the White House. However, a special prosecutor did not claim that the workers' actions affected the election's outcome. Jacqueline Maiden, elections coordinator of the Cuyahoga County Elections Board, and ballot manager Kathleen Dreamer each were convicted of a felony count of negligent misconduct of an elections employee. They also were convicted of one misdemeanor count each of failure of elections employees to perform their duty. Prosecutors accused Maiden and Dreamer of secretly reviewing preselected ballots before a public recount on Dec. 16, 2004. They worked behind closed doors for three days to pick ballots they knew would not cause discrepancies when checked by hand, prosecutors said. Defense attorney Roger Synenberg has said the workers were following procedures as they understood them. Kerry gained 17 votes and Bush lost six in the county's recount. Maiden and Dreamer, who still work for the elections board, face a possible sentence of six to 18 months for the felony conviction. Sentencing is Feb. 26.
__________________
Cheney is the second executive officer to shoot someone in the face and chest. Clinton was the first. |
|
||||||||||||
|
2006 FAST FACTS ON VOTER FRAUD
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I could cont to expose the democratic fraud......but we can all see that your lies about the first conviction is just that...a lie......democrats have been convicted of voter fraud in Ohio...... Hey anyone want some crack for a vote? Many democrats got high before voting......crackheads........... |
|
||||
|
Quote:
Follow up to this year:- Quote:
More shenanigans. |
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
|||
|
The entire "voter/election" fraud debate is so full of absurdities that it would be laughable if it weren't such a such a sterling example of obfuscation associated with potentially serious problems.
First, some common sense. Democrats now (and forever in the past) benefit from high turnout elections. Thus, they encourage rules and regulations that make it easier to vote. Republicans now (and forever in the past) benefit from low turnout elections. They try to make it more difficult to vote. These are truisms that anyone familiar with elections knows. Second, if you're going to steal an election, don't bother with producing illegitimate votes. Get control of the counting process. The former approach is inherently costly, difficult, and uncertain. The latter approach is inexpensive, easy to conceal, and certain. Third, the best way for Democrats to "steal" elections is pay people to vote. This is an approach with a long pedigree in American politics, but went out of fashion years ago as political machines declined in importance and affluence made it more and more expensive to pay people to vote. Fourth, the best way for Republicans to "steal" elections is to discourage voting via complex registration requirements, increasing the time required to vote (by providing fewer voting machines in Democratic precincts), convincing people that they may be challenged as legitimate voters, raising doubts about whether votes are honestly counted, and encouraging purchase of voting machines from Republican party supporters. The various claims that "voter fraud" is widespread in the United States are bogus, pure and simple. Virtually no evidence has been presented in any court anywhere in recent years that significant numbers of illegitimate VOTES have been counted in any major election. That hasn't stopped the Repubican Party (and the Bush administration) from claiming that the POTENTIAL for voter fraud exists (due largely to the failure to clean the registration rolls frequently in many jurisdictions. The rationale for the Republican claims is transparent: to encourage passing laws that make voting more costly and inconvenient for groups that are reasonably expected to support the Democratic Party. This has been the basis for the Justice Department support for state laws in Colorado and Georgia requiring state ID's to vote, requirements thrown out by Federal Courts. It was the basis for firing various US Attorneys who failed to get behind the Justice Department effort to prosecute voter fraud cases whether the cases were legitimate or not. It is very unlikely that the 2004 Ohio presidential result was "stolen" in the conventional sense by the Repubicans. It is very likely, indeed it is irrefutable, that the Republican Secy of State in Ohio did everything he could to discourage Democratic voters from going to the polls. Had a less partisan Secretary of State been in office, it is certainly arguable that the result would have been different. In the 2006 election, it is literally ludicrous to maintain that the Democratic majority in the House and Senate was the result of fraud. In fact, had the gerrymandering of Congressional districts in several states, including Texas, had not occurred, the Democratic majority in the House would have been larger. It is true that in at least one Congressional District the failure to count some votes almost undoubtedly led to the "wrong' candidate winning. That, however, was Katherine Harris' seat in Florida that went to a Republican candidate by 324 votes while over 18,000 votes in Democratic precincts were inexplicably "blank" in that race.
__________________
"To announce that..we are to stand by the president whether right or wrong..is morally treasonable to the American public." -- Theodore Roosevelt, 1918 |
|
||||
|
This story that the 2004 Ohio elections were rigged has been floating around for some time now. Shortly after the election, I was following a forum where one of the participants was actually an election monitor. He claimed many of the digital voting machines were not recording the votes for Kerry, but instead changed the vote to support Bush. He was saying other monitors were complaining about the poor performance of the machines as well, but were escorted into a private room by some not too friendly guys.
At the time, it all sounded like BS to me, and I haven't really followed the gossip since then. I get bored quickly with political conspiracy theories. But for someone to actually get convicted adds a lot of credence to the stories of those who are claiming the election was "rigged". I would not expect the prosecutor in the case would try to go after some lofty charges, such as criminal intent in the first case. I can imagine it is a hard position for a prosecutor to stick his nose into this bee hive of political mudslinging. However, just to get a conviction on the most minor count probably means we are just starting to see this conspiracy begin to unravel. Whether or not we will ever know if some big fish are involved in vote fraud remains to be seen.
__________________
Hobo Charter member of 'Republicans Who Hate Bush" Club |
|
||||
|
House Judiciary Chair Tells Palast in Interview: 'We're Not Through With Griffin by Any Means'
Indicates Caging Operation Could Not Have Been Done Without Knowledge of Rove, According to Palast Team... As reported previously, investigative journalist Greg Palast was scheduled to meet with John Conyers this evening for an on-camera interview for the BBC. His team, just out from the interview, sends this dispatch to The BRAD BLOG... Rove Pick for US Attorney Resigns After Conyers Seeks Evidence from BBC Tim Griffin, formerly right hand man to Karl Rove, resigned Thursday as US Attorney for Arkansas hours after BBC Television 'Newsnight' reported that Congressman John Conyers requested the network's evidence on Griffin's involvement in 'caging voters.' Greg Palast, reporting for both BBC Newsnight and Democracy Now, obtained a series of confidential emails dating from the 2004 presidential election in which the GOP operative transmitted so-called 'caging lists' of voters to state party leaders. Experts have concluded the caging lists were designed for a mass challenge voters right to cast ballots. The caging lists were heavily weighted with minority voters including African-American homeless men, students and soldiers sent overseas. Conyers, Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee investigating the firing of US Attorneys, met Thursday evening in New York with Palast. After reviewing key documents, Conyers stated that, despite Griffin's resignation, "we're not through with him by any means." Conyers indicated that he thought it unlikely that Griffin could carry out this massive 'caging' operation without the knowledge of White House Deputy Chief of Staff Rove. Griffin, who was chosen as US Attorney at Rove's request, has not responded to requests by BBC to explain the 'caging' memos. For more on the caging lists, see Palast's BRAD BLOG Exclusive from last week, just after Monica Goodling's stunning admissions concerning vote caging allegations about Griffin in her House Judiciary Committee testimony. Also see our coverage of Slate's article late this afternoon as they become the first MSM-ish outlet to give a serious look at Goodling's overlooked-by-the-MSM, yet bombshell statement. Palast first reported on the emails from Griffin containing vote caging lists for BBC's Newsnight, prior to the 2004 Presidential Election. |