"Tiller" the "Baby Killer" above Kansas law

Sleepy · #1 (**permalink**) 06-12-2007, 05:03 PM

http://www.efg2.com/Meadowlark/2006/...2-27/index.htm

If charges aren't brought against this guy, the Democratic Governor should be impeached and the same for the D.A. who's also a Democrat. But considering that the whole crew is pro abortion, I wouldn't be surprised if they turn a blind eye. Kansas is a great state to live in. They can enact laws, then pick and choose which ones to obey.

Crackerbread · #2 (**permalink**) 06-12-2007, 05:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sleepy";p=&quot

http://www.efg2.com/Meadowlark/2006/ShameOfKansas/OReilly-2006-12-27/index.htm

If charges aren't brought against this guy, the Democratic Governor should be impeached and the same for the D.A. who's also a Democrat. But considering that the whole crew is pro abortion, I wouldn't be surprised if they turn a blind eye. Kansas is a great state to live in. They can enact laws, then pick and choose which ones to obey.

Not a pro choice nor a pro life type of guy(could care less).........but I believe that this doctor should have to follow the same laws as the rest of the country no matter what state he has his practice in........

JP5 · #3 (**permalink**) 06-12-2007, 05:24 PM

I agree Sleepy. "Stress" as an excuse, my arse---the guy's a baby killer.

Colin-D · #4 (**permalink**) 06-12-2007, 05:25 PM

Hey, he provided abortions. He didn't kill babies, he aborted fetus's at least call it what it is. Good god.

f100supersabr · #5 (**permalink**) 06-12-2007, 06:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sleepy";p=&quot

http://www.efg2.com/Meadowlark/2006/ShameOfKansas/OReilly-2006-12-27/index.htm

If charges aren't brought against this guy, the Democratic Governor should be impeached and the same for the D.A. who's also a Democrat. But considering that the whole crew is pro abortion, I wouldn't be surprised if they turn a blind eye. Kansas is a great state to live in. They can enact laws, then pick and choose which ones to obey.

The guy is an abortionist not a baby killer!!! You bozo's are letting your rhetoric rule whatever is left of your power to think which appears to be rather diminished.

So since Bushko got us into the Iraq war and we had some Iarqi infants killed as a result of collateral damage would Bushko be a baby irradicator ?

The12thMan · #6 (**permalink**) 06-12-2007, 07:26 PM

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/liv...n_page_id=1774

Quote:

A girl born after just under 22 weeks in the womb - among the shortest gestation periods known for a live birth - will remain in a hospital a few extra days as a precaution, officials said....
She has suffered respiratory and digestive problems, as well as a mild brain hemorrhage, but doctors believe the health concerns will not have major long-term effects...

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/new...icle530133.ece

Quote:

A study of the most premature babies showed most went on to suffer disabilities. The EPICure study of babies born at 25 weeks or less, led by researchers at Nottingham University, found that, by the age of six, only 20% of surviving children had no disabilities; 22% had severe disabilities, including cerebral palsy; while 34% had milder problems such as a squint.

In addition, it found that only 11% of all babies born at 23 weeks survived. Since the study began, however, care has improved and the figure is believed to be closer to 20%.

Note that these babies spent less time in the womb than the fetuses aborted by Tiller.

And, if you read the text, you'll see that some of the abortions were peformed on CHILDREN. The pregnancy of a 10 year old screams for an investigation.

DuH2 · #7 (**permalink**) 06-12-2007, 07:36 PM

He aborts extreme late term (basically babies) and does so with kids well under the age and with excuses that are pathetic.

I'm mostly pro-choice but this guys a disgusting worm...and calling him a "baby killer" is pretty accurate.

Colin-D · #8 (**permalink**) 06-12-2007, 08:02 PM

I disagree that it's a baby. But do you really think it's better for a child to be born into a family that is wholly opposed to it's very existence? I don't think thats a great environment for a child to grow up, if it is even brought home and given a chance.

Sleepy · #9 (**permalink**) 06-12-2007, 08:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Colin-D";p=&quot

I disagree that it's a baby. But do you really think it's better for a child to be born into a family that is wholly opposed to it's very existence? I don't think thats a great environment for a child to grow up, if it is even brought home and given a chance.

the fact that the guy broke the law and the Democratic Governor is covering for him, bother you, or are you so caught up in the baby vs.
fetus debate that you can't see beyond that?

Colin-D · #10 (**permalink**) 06-13-2007, 08:16 AM

I think it's more of a case that it isn't that wrong but technically he broke the law so he has to pay! This is what happened to Clinton and this is what happened to Genarlow Wilson. You can look up what happened to the latter when this way of justifying punishment is used. It's pretty bad. I will admit he broke the law, but if the law is wrong I don't necessarily agree that it should be strictly obeyed.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode