Political Forum
     

Go Back   Political Forum > General Political Chat > Current Events


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 06-21-2007, 01:30 PM
raytri's Avatar
raytri raytri is offline
Site Moderator
Guru
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Minnesota
Age: 41
Posts: 17,619
usa us minnesota
raytri has a reputation beyond reputeraytri has a reputation beyond reputeraytri has a reputation beyond reputeraytri has a reputation beyond reputeraytri has a reputation beyond reputeraytri has a reputation beyond reputeraytri has a reputation beyond reputeraytri has a reputation beyond reputeraytri has a reputation beyond reputeraytri has a reputation beyond reputeraytri has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 110,782
Default Judge in rape trial bans word "rape"

http://slate.com/id/2168758

Quote:
Last fall, Cheuvront granted a motion by defense attorneys barring the use of the words rape, sexual assault, victim, assailant, and sexual assault kit from the trial of Pamir Safi—accused of raping Tory Bowen in October 2004.
The logic is that the words are prejudicial, subtly implying that a crime has occurred when that, in fact, is what the trial is trying to determine.

Fair enough. But how do you discuss a rape allegation without using any of those words?

In this case, by using the word "sex". Instead of "he raped me", say "he had sex with me against my will."

Which obscures meaning *and* is arguably prejudicial in the opposite direction, by suggesting that what happened was merely sex, not rape.

Especially because the jury is not told that the words have been excluded, which could conceivably lead them to such logical conclusions as "well, they never described it as rape or sexual assault, so how can I convict someone of sexual assault?"

In a murder case, we don't pretend no one was killed; we either deny that it was intentional or that the accused is actually the one that did it. Surely juries are capable of similar distinctions in sexual assault cases.
__________________
Man up.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Red Cross - Donate Today    Save the Rainforest
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 06-21-2007, 03:59 PM
Joker's Avatar
Joker Joker is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: the process of locating.
Posts: 5,683
us new jersey
Joker has a reputation beyond reputeJoker has a reputation beyond reputeJoker has a reputation beyond reputeJoker has a reputation beyond reputeJoker has a reputation beyond reputeJoker has a reputation beyond reputeJoker has a reputation beyond reputeJoker has a reputation beyond reputeJoker has a reputation beyond reputeJoker has a reputation beyond reputeJoker has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 64,069
Default ...

It obviously favors the defendant. It would only effect the prosecutor's arguments because only he would use such words to make the defendant to look guilty. The defense would never use such words to describe the incident for the opposite reason.
__________________
WARNING: In the unlikely event of an accidental agreement with any or all points made in the above post, contact a clinical psychologist immediately.

The views expressed in the above post are not necessarily those of Joker and/or any of his affiliates.

"You have found the secret message. Do you have too much time on your hands? ...Let it go."
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 06-21-2007, 04:05 PM
JP5's Avatar
JP5 JP5 is offline
Site Moderator
Guru
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 22,664
us texas
JP5 has a reputation beyond reputeJP5 has a reputation beyond reputeJP5 has a reputation beyond reputeJP5 has a reputation beyond reputeJP5 has a reputation beyond reputeJP5 has a reputation beyond reputeJP5 has a reputation beyond reputeJP5 has a reputation beyond reputeJP5 has a reputation beyond reputeJP5 has a reputation beyond reputeJP5 has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 149,188
Default ?

Yet one more example of how we bend over backwards in this country to protect defendants----at least in some cases. Certainly not in the example of the Duke Lacrosse players.
__________________
"This is a time for a national imperative not to fail in Iraq." Condoleeza Rice, January 11, 2007
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 06-21-2007, 04:09 PM
The12thMan's Avatar
The12thMan The12thMan is offline
Site Moderator
Guru
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 13,287
usa us texas
The12thMan has a reputation beyond reputeThe12thMan has a reputation beyond reputeThe12thMan has a reputation beyond reputeThe12thMan has a reputation beyond reputeThe12thMan has a reputation beyond reputeThe12thMan has a reputation beyond reputeThe12thMan has a reputation beyond reputeThe12thMan has a reputation beyond reputeThe12thMan has a reputation beyond reputeThe12thMan has a reputation beyond reputeThe12thMan has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 139,438
Default stupid judge

That's just so sad. The judge should never restrict the witness in such a manner. Witnesses take an oath to tell the truth. They should be free to use the words that best suits them.
__________________
Do you know what it's like to fall in the mud and get kicked... in the head... with an iron boot? Of course you don't, no one does. It never happens. It's a dumb question... skip it.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Sponsored Links

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:21 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0
Template-Modifikationen durch TMS
vBCredits v1.3 ©2007 by Darkwaltz4
Advertisement System V2.1 By   Branden