Quote:
Originally Posted by JP5";p="
Quote:
Originally Posted by Demosthenes";p="
Come one now, in all fairness do you think the Republicans would be so passioante about this if the Gov. of Mass right now was a Democrat and would most likely appoint a Democrat to relplace Kerry? I don't think they would.
-Demosthenes
|
Of course, they wouldn't like it. But they wouldn't change the law for themselves....as these Dems are doing.
Look....Governor's of all states have this right: Republican OR Democrat. That's not the point. The subject is: changing the law in the middle of an election to bernefit oneself politically.
|
If the governor was Democratic, the Legislature wouldn't be trying this because there would be no need.
But JP5, I have no doubt the Republicans would attempt this if the tables were reversed and they thought they could get away with it.
That doesn't make it right. But you can't use this example to show Republicans are more upstanding than Democrats.
As for Texas, we touched on this in another thread, but: Texas law requires the state to draw district lines based on the decennial census. The Legislature failed to, so it fell to the courts. At the time, the court-approved districts were certified by the AG, and everyone expected them to stand until the next census in 2010.
Instead, the Republicans came along a couple of years later and redrew them, simply because they could. At the very least, that breaks tradition and expectations -- exactly what the Mass. Legislature is accused of doing.
Whether the original lines were fair is one thing, and I concede that it's odd on the face of it to see a Democratic majority in Texas' Congressional representation. But there's a process for challenging gerrymandering. This was a pure power grab by the Republicans. And you want to talk about gerrymandering? Take a look at some of the districts the Republicans drew.