Thread: Supreme Court Settles Ohaha Birth Certificiate Issue Once and for all!

U.S. Supreme Court Has Ruled on Obama’s Eligibility!!
Site Administrator posted on November 13, 2011 20:51
U.S. Supreme Court Has Ruled on Obama’s Eligibility!!

By Craig Andresen on November 13, 2011 at 5:23 pm

The National Patriot
According to the United States Supreme Court, Obama is ineligible to be the President. That’s right, you read that correctly. The United States Supreme Court has ruled that Obama is ineligible to serve as President.
It’s not that you haven’t been paying attention lately and yes, you can be excused for missing the ruling as it came down, not in the last few days but back in 1875.
This is the argument currently being made by the Liberty Legal Foundation.
The Liberty Legal Foundation has filed not 1 but 2 lawsuits, one in Arizona and the other in Tennessee neither of which have one single thing to do with Obama’s birth certificate OR challenging whether or not Obama was born in the United States.
There is no need for either in regard to these lawsuits.

At the core of this action is a simple request that Federal courts uphold the Supreme Court ruling. Both lawsuits, and the Liberty Legal Foundation promises there will be more, would render it impossible for the Democratic National Committee to place Obama’s name on the 2012 ballot.
Here’s the crux of it.
Back in 1875, the United States Supreme Court, in Minor v, Happersett, ruled that:


“Natural Born Citizen” was defined as children born of two U.S. citizens – regardless of the location of the birth. It found: “The Constitution does not, in words, say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common-law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also.”

Obama’s problem, by his own admission and records of the State Department is this:


Obama’s father was not a United States citizen.


Therefore, via Minor v, Happersett and the United States Supreme Court in 1875, Obama is ineligible because, since his father was not a U.S. citizen, Obama is not a natural born citizen.


For a person to run, as his or her party’s nominee for President, the party must issue certification that the person named is eligible under the United States Constitution to become President.
http://www.citizens4freedom.com/Arti...igibility.aspx








Done Deal Crying towels on the left!


The question is whats going on with the supreme court today that they did not IMMEDIATELY site that case and disqualify him. Could it be judicial corruption?

And all this was known in 2008 and yet the establishment let obama run!!!

It's very entertaining.

Re OP. I see you have made your decision. NOW ENFORCE IT.

LOL Birthers.

Originally Posted by Speeders R Murderers

And all this was known in 2008 and yet the establishment let obama run!!!

Did they know?

The establishment in Washington is dumber than dirt.

They vote for bills all the time that go into law when they don't have any idea what they are voting for.

Originally Posted by Kokomojojo

The question is whats going on with the supreme court today that they did not IMMEDIATELY site that case and disqualify him. Could it be judicial corruption?

Aren't you the guy who doesn't believe the courts have authority under the consititution?

Originally Posted by Kokomojojo

U.S. Supreme Court Has Ruled on Obama’s Eligibility!!
Site Administrator posted on November 13, 2011 20:51
U.S. Supreme Court Has Ruled on Obama’s Eligibility!!

By Craig Andresen on November 13, 2011 at 5:23 pm

The National Patriot
According to the United States Supreme Court, Obama is ineligible to be the President. That’s right, you read that correctly. The United States Supreme Court has ruled that Obama is ineligible to serve as President.
It’s not that you haven’t been paying attention lately and yes, you can be excused for missing the ruling as it came down, not in the last few days but back in 1875.
This is the argument currently being made by the Liberty Legal Foundation.
The Liberty Legal Foundation has filed not 1 but 2 lawsuits, one in Arizona and the other in Tennessee neither of which have one single thing to do with Obama’s birth certificate OR challenging whether or not Obama was born in the United States.
There is no need for either in regard to these lawsuits.

At the core of this action is a simple request that Federal courts uphold the Supreme Court ruling. Both lawsuits, and the Liberty Legal Foundation promises there will be more, would render it impossible for the Democratic National Committee to place Obama’s name on the 2012 ballot.
Here’s the crux of it.
Back in 1875, the United States Supreme Court, in Minor v, Happersett, ruled that:


“Natural Born Citizen” was defined as children born of two U.S. citizens – regardless of the location of the birth. It found: “The Constitution does not, in words, say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common-law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also.”

Obama’s problem, by his own admission and records of the State Department is this:


Obama’s father was not a United States citizen.


Therefore, via Minor v, Happersett and the United States Supreme Court in 1875, Obama is ineligible because, since his father was not a U.S. citizen, Obama is not a natural born citizen.


For a person to run, as his or her party’s nominee for President, the party must issue certification that the person named is eligible under the United States Constitution to become President.
http://www.citizens4freedom.com/Arti...igibility.aspx








Done Deal Crying towels on the left!


The question is whats going on with the supreme court today that they did not IMMEDIATELY site that case and disqualify him. Could it be judicial corruption?

Bill Cunningham,a Talk Radio icon in Cincinnatti and hosts the Drudge
Sunday night Talk Radio program insists that it will never be realized.
Cunningham,himself a practicing Attorney and whose wife is a Judge,
knows a few things about law and the practicality of Law.That is the reason
Karl Rove and Bill Bennett and Dennis Prager,Michael Medved and
even Bill Kristol have for 2 years now,denounced anyone who tried to make
an issue of Obama's Birth as a legal issue.It's a matter of practicality.
Let's say a Movement got started.And some Radical Right wing Judge
decided to hear and rule on the Obama Legality { Natural Born } issue.
Then it goes to Appelate and then State Supreme.That in itself would
require a lot of luck.But even if successful,Declaring Obama Unqualified
to be a President would mean EVERYTHING he signed would then be
Null & Void.Obama has signed a lot of crap.It would be Impractical to
for judges to render such decision.
It's a matter of Practicality.Obama knew this.His Campaign knew that.
The Lamestream media is fully aware.
In fact it's just another reason why Obama was chosen.
Along with his color.So,the Lamestream could play the race card over
anything UnObama-like.
This is what we're fighting against now.This Nefarious control grid Democrats
have placed this Country in.It's like Democrats are a universal Ice Storm.

Originally Posted by Mac-7

Did they know?

The establishment in Washington is dumber than dirt.

They vote for bills all the time that go into law when they don't have any idea what they are voting for.

Nothing matters; nobody cares. It may even be a good thing that nobody cares if someone running for president is "eligible" or not. If it doesn't matter whether a president is Constitutionally eligible, then maybe we could attract much better candidates for the office!

With a little luck, for instance, maybe we could convince Vladimir Putin to run for President of the United States. There's no doubt in my mind he'd make a better president than anybody else since Ronald Reagan left office. Could he do worse than our wonderful President Golfclub? Would Putin be worse than RINO candidate, "Flip-flop" Romney? I've already got a campaign slogan: "Be glad, with Vlad!"

depends on how you define a "US citizen" imho, immigrants are US citizens too. although they themselves are not naturally born US citizens, their kids are.

don't get it wrong bro i hate immigrants, no matter illegal or legal, but in obama's case a birth certificate is solid enough to make him eligible for presidency imho. Obama was indeed born in hawaii