?
Quote:
Originally Posted by shintao";p="
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blade";p="
http://www.newsmax.com/insidecover/thomas_anita_hill/2007/09/28/36715.html
Justice Clarence Thomas finally speaks about Anita Hill, the employee who was used by the liberal-left to sabotage his supreme court nomination. The left has always had a special viciousness for the persons of the groups that "belong" on their plantation, notably blacks, but who take the conservative path.
|
Sabotage? You mean publicaly humiliate a sex fend on the floor of the Congress - then give him a pass to the SC. Dems are always vicious with sex predators like Thomas, and he can talk till the cows come, there were three witnesses besides Hill to this overcharged sexual deviate that was pawing womens crotches and watching porn movies on the job. Now he thinks denying his crimes under the Bush Administration will somehow save his sorry arse future embarrassment. Another OJ!! No free rides..................
In 1991, Thomas adamantly denied Hill's accusations that he made inappropriate sexual remarks, including references to pornographic movies. Thomas says he did talk about X-rated movies while at Yale Law School......
Thomas, 59, acknowledges that three other former EEOC employees backed Hill's version of events, but he says they either had been fired or had left the agency on bad terms.
|
..."this overcharged sexual deviate that was pawing womens crotches."
Are you talking about Thomas or Bill Clinton? Libs loved Bill Clinton regardless. So the ONLY reason I can see they didn't like Thomas is that he is black and dared to be a conservative. Can't be stepping off the plantation, you know. 
__________________
"If the President simply adds a couple of Republican solutions to a trillion dollar health care package that the American people don't support, it isn't bi-partisan. It's political cover," Rep Eric Cantor (R-Va.)
|