Political Forum  

Go Back   Political Forum > General Political Chat > Current Events

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 11-02-2007, 04:19 PM
amepro amepro is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 3,472
amepro is on a distinguished road
Credits: 13,911
Default Bush Administration Blocked Waterboarding Critic

Quote:
Bush Administration Blocked Waterboarding Critic
Former DOJ Official Tested the Method Himself, in Quest to Form Torture Policy.

A senior Justice Department official, charged with reworking the administration's legal position on torture in 2004, became so concerned about the controversial interrogation technique of waterboarding that he decided to experience it firsthand, sources told ABC News.

Daniel Levin, then acting assistant attorney general, went to a military base near Washington and underwent the procedure to inform his analysis of different interrogation techniques.

After the experience, Levin told White House officials that even though he knew he wouldn't die, he found the experience terrifying and thought that it clearly simulated drowning.

Levin, who refused to comment for this story, concluded water boarding could be illegal torture unless performed in a highly limited way, and with close supervision. And, sources tell ABC News, he believed the Bush Administration had failed to offer clear guidelines on its use.

Bush Administration Blocked Critic
The administration at the time was reeling from an August 2002 memo by Jay Bybee, then the head of the Office of Legal Counsel, which laid out possible justifications for torture. In June 2004, Levin's predecessor at the office, Jack Goldsmith, officially withdrew the Bybee memo, finding it deeply flawed.

When Levin took over from Goldsmith, he went to work on a memo that would effectively replace the Bybee memo as the administration's legal position on torture. It was during this time that he underwent waterboarding.

In December of 2004 Levin released the new memo. He said "torture is abhorrent" but he went on to say in a footnote that the memo was not declaring the administration's previous opinions illegal. The White House, with Alberto Gonzales as the White House counsel, insisted that this footnote be included in the memo.

But Levin never finished a second memo imposing tighter controls on the specific interrogation techniques. Sources say he was forced out of the Justice Department when Gonzales became attorney general. http://abcnews.go.com/WN/DOJ/story?id=3814076&page=1
This administration doesn't like the answer....out they go.
__________________
I've been informed....don't blame Bush, he's "not in control"
That must make him out of control
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 11-02-2007, 06:53 PM
JP5's Avatar
JP5 JP5 is online now
Site Moderator
Guru
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 20,769
us texas
JP5 has a brilliant futureJP5 has a brilliant futureJP5 has a brilliant futureJP5 has a brilliant futureJP5 has a brilliant futureJP5 has a brilliant futureJP5 has a brilliant futureJP5 has a brilliant futureJP5 has a brilliant futureJP5 has a brilliant futureJP5 has a brilliant future
Credits: 137,116
Default ?

So......David Levin tried it and is okay.....is that what you're saying?

No fingers lost; no toes lost; no permanent scars; no permanent damage whatsoever.....right?

So, did Levin tell us that if he were a terrorist with information to share to get himself out of such a treatment......was it bad enough that he thinks he would have talked? Isn't that the point of it, after all???
__________________
"This is a time for a national imperative not to fail in Iraq." Condoleeza Rice, January 11, 2007
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 11-03-2007, 03:47 AM
nonsqtr nonsqtr is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Burbank CA
Posts: 6,049
nonsqtr has disabled reputation
Credits: 59,034
Default ..

Quote:
Originally Posted by JP5";p=&quot View Post
So......David Levin tried it and is okay.....is that what you're saying?

No fingers lost; no toes lost; no permanent scars; no permanent damage whatsoever.....right?

So, did Levin tell us that if he were a terrorist with information to share to get himself out of such a treatment......was it bad enough that he thinks he would have talked? Isn't that the point of it, after all???
Vee vill maekhe you tok....

Vee hav vayz.....

Freakin' nazis.

Debating the "technicalities" of torture.

===> I told you guys from day one, that these Neo-Con-artists were dangerous, didn't I? I told you they were a menace, didn't I?

Well, here you have direct evidence. Freakin' torture.... oh my God. Great way to represent the American People, Georgie.... ya freakin' moron.

You know, the CIA supposedly waterboarded three terrorists. Three. And you know, like, here we are debating whether we should be doing this "now and forever".

Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 11-03-2007, 04:50 AM
amepro amepro is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 3,472
amepro is on a distinguished road
Credits: 13,911
Default Your definition of torture - loss of extremities

Quote:
Originally Posted by JP5";p=&quot View Post
So......David Levin tried it and is okay.....is that what you're saying?

No fingers lost; no toes lost; no permanent scars; no permanent damage whatsoever.....right?

So, did Levin tell us that if he were a terrorist with information to share to get himself out of such a treatment......was it bad enough that he thinks he would have talked? Isn't that the point of it, after all???
Maybe you ought to try it if you are fine with it JP. That way you can become a valid spokesperson for the administration in reference to the issue of torture. You don't have a problem with it, so go for it....No worries, you won't lose any fingers or toes.

You're telling me that your definition of torture is; Loss of extremities/permanent damage. It's obvious that you don't believe that there could possibly be mental or internal damage done....You have that "out of sight out of mind" thought process.

You are also short sighted because you don't see the damage done for the U.S. reputation by supporting torture.....in other words, we no longer have the moral upper hand.
__________________
I've been informed....don't blame Bush, he's "not in control"
That must make him out of control
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 11-03-2007, 04:52 AM
amepro amepro is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 3,472
amepro is on a distinguished road
Credits: 13,911
Default .

Nosqtr wrote:
Quote:
I told you guys from day one, that these Neo-Con-artists were dangerous, didn't I? I told you they were a menace, didn't I?
The neo-cons have ruined our country. Here's the problem; ignorant people that never even heard the term "neo-con" are supporting neo-con policies.
__________________
I've been informed....don't blame Bush, he's "not in control"
That must make him out of control
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 11-03-2007, 05:26 AM
Mack's Avatar
Mack Mack is offline
Analyst
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,882
Mack has a spectacular aura aboutMack has a spectacular aura aboutMack has a spectacular aura about
Credits: 8,625
Default .

Quote:
Originally Posted by JP5";p=&quot View Post
So......David Levin tried it and is okay.....is that what you're saying?

No fingers lost; no toes lost; no permanent scars; no permanent damage whatsoever.....right?

So, did Levin tell us that if he were a terrorist with information to share to get himself out of such a treatment......was it bad enough that he thinks he would have talked? Isn't that the point of it, after all???
So basically we should be able to do any technique that doesn't result in extreme physical pain or any permanent damage?
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 11-03-2007, 09:09 AM
amepro amepro is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 3,472
amepro is on a distinguished road
Credits: 13,911
Default Story on youtube

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H8oxMbWs8Hw
__________________
I've been informed....don't blame Bush, he's "not in control"
That must make him out of control
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 11-03-2007, 09:13 AM
jhffmn jhffmn is offline
Sr. Correspondent
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 475
jhffmn is on a distinguished road
Credits: 2,513
Default xx

1) There is no proof that the U.S. engages in waterboarding at the moment. I suspect we do, but there is no evidence.

2) Anyone with knowlegde of classified information is prohibited from giving an oppinion on it.

Sounds reasonable to me, what is the issue again?
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 11-03-2007, 09:17 AM
jhffmn jhffmn is offline
Sr. Correspondent
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 475
jhffmn is on a distinguished road
Credits: 2,513
Default xx

Quote:
Originally Posted by amepro";p=&quot View Post
(mental) damage done
Does that include hurt feelings? Please define mental damage? Isn't imprisonment mental damage? Sleep deprivation is torture now too right? What about yelling at someone, or threatening them. Harsh words could cause mental damage.

Basically, claiming that waterboarding is torture is claiming that scaring the bejesus out of someone is torture.

Scaring the bejesus out of someone is torture?

Scaring someone too much is torture. They get really scared, and that is mental damage.

Don't frighten our enemies too much, that is torture. Making someone fear for their life is torture?

I really just do not get it.

Do you honestly believe that scaring someone is torture? Or because waterboarding is being discussed a lot lately and most people agree, you agree as well?

Well, if people want to think waterboarding is torture... Don't expect me to agree, EVER.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 11-03-2007, 10:40 AM
nonsqtr nonsqtr is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Burbank CA
Posts: 6,049
nonsqtr has disabled reputation
Credits: 59,034
Default tyrants and miscreants = "STUPID PEOPLE"

That's my "vocabularly", guys.

Every time you hear the word "tyrant" from me, or "miscreant", or anything like that, just substitute the concept "stupid people" in there, and you'll "get" what I'm saying.
Now look at this one folks -

Quote:
Originally Posted by jhffmn";p=&quot View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by amepro";p=&quot View Post
(mental) damage done
Does that include hurt feelings? Please define mental damage? Isn't imprisonment mental damage? Sleep deprivation is torture now too right? What about yelling at someone, or threatening them. Harsh words could cause mental damage.
Still trying to argue the technicalities of torture. *PERSONAL ATTACK DELETED*
Quote:
Originally Posted by jhffmn";p=&quot View Post
[Basically, claiming that waterboarding is torture is claiming that scaring the bejesus out of someone is torture.
Duh..... Yeah. Duh, right?

"Yes, little jhffmn, there really is such a thing as mental durress, and if you don't believe that, why don't you just go out and try it?"

Jeez.....


Quote:
Originally Posted by jhffmn";p=&quot View Post
[Scaring the bejesus out of someone is torture?
It CAN be torture, depending on the way it's done.

Quote:
Originally Posted by jhffmn";p=&quot View Post
Scaring someone too much is torture. They get really scared, and that is mental damage.
Freakin' morons. See what I mean, guys? The American People don't understand war anymore. 99% of us are just blowing smoke out of our backsides, with statements like the above. "How is torture related to mental damage?" I mean, COME ON. What kind of a freakin' idiot to you have to be not to understand that linkage? That would be exactly like Ahmedinejad claiming there are "no gays in Iran".

Quote:
Originally Posted by jhffmn";p=&quot View Post
Don't frighten our enemies too much, that is torture. Making someone fear for their life is torture?

I really just do not get it.
That much I can see.

Quote:
Originally Posted by jhffmn";p=&quot View Post
Do you honestly believe that scaring someone is torture? Or because waterboarding is being discussed a lot lately and most people agree, you agree as well?

Well, if people want to think waterboarding is torture... Don't expect me to agree, EVER.
I can make you agree, jhffmn. I can do it in under five minutes. All I have to do, is subject you to the processs once, and you will agree.

That is the point, isn't it? Anyone who's ever done this, says it's a torture technique. Everyone except Bushie, that is, and that's 'cause he's never done it.
*PERSONAL ATTACK DELETED*
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks
Digg del.icio.us StumbleUpon Google Yahoo Furl Reddit

Thread Tools
Display Modes

 
Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:12 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0 Release Candidate 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0
Template-Modifikationen durch TMS
vBCredits v1.3 ©2007 by Darkwaltz4