Thread: YOUTUBE and COMMUNISM

Originally Posted by kk8

I was just about to correct you when I noticed you corrected yourself....you first said Youtube was owned by newscorp....why????

I got confused with Hulu. (mentioned in the editing notes)

Originally Posted by kk8

Bulls***...how do you account for people like George Soros. That was not a true statement and you know it.

Murdoch is another, but for the other side.

Most billionaires fund both parties, because it makes more sense to buy both sides if you can.

Originally Posted by kk8

But, you like a teenager....just keep saying the same thing without having to prove it.

i'm 53 years old, it's 4th graders that walk around saying 'prove it', when they have no clue what that means

Originally Posted by dujac

i'm 53 years old, it's 4th graders that walk around saying 'prove it', when they have no clue what that means

WTF are you talking about....WHO TF doesn't know what "prove it" means??? Even a 4th grader does! Why do you keep saying that I don't know what that means? LOL, it's just so ridiculous!

Originally Posted by kk8

WTF are you talking about....WHO TF doesn't know what "prove it" means??? Even a 4th grader does! Why do you keep saying that I don't know what that means? LOL, it's just so ridiculous!

i knew you had no clue what the 'burden of proof' is and wouldn't bother to look up

so i'll spoon feed it to you, though i doubt it'll get through that way either

Holder of the burden

When debating any issue, there is an implicit burden of proof on the person asserting a claim. "If this responsibility or burden of proof is shifted to a critic, the fallacy of appealing to ignorance is committed". This burden does not necessarily require a strictly logical proof, although many strong arguments do rise to this level (such as in logical syllogisms). Rather, the evidential standard required for a given claim is determined by convention or community standards, with regard to the context of the claim in question.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philoso...urden_of_proof


you certainly haven't proven any association between communism and you tube


you've made some vague assertions about you tube, comments settings and communism which are really quite ridiculous and then said that an article from the blaze is proof of communism, when it doesn't even mention communism once

do you even know what communism is?

Originally Posted by dujac

i knew you had no clue what the 'burden of proof' is and wouldn't bother to look up

so i'll spoon feed it to you, though i doubt it'll get through that way either

Holder of the burden

When debating any issue, there is an implicit burden of proof on the person asserting a claim. "If this responsibility or burden of proof is shifted to a critic, the fallacy of appealing to ignorance is committed". This burden does not necessarily require a strictly logical proof, although many strong arguments do rise to this level (such as in logical syllogisms). Rather, the evidential standard required for a given claim is determined by convention or community standards, with regard to the context of the claim in question.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philoso...urden_of_proof


you certainly haven't proven any association between communism and you tube


you've made some vague assertions about you tube, comments settings and communism which are really quite ridiculous and then said that an article from the blaze is proof of communism, when it doesn't even mention communism once

do you even know what communism is?

Now you might want to look up...What communism looks like.

Originally Posted by kk8

Now you might want to look up...What communism looks like.

i took several classes at university that fleshed it out quite well and have been behind the iron curtain

your assertion that you tube is a joke, it's a capitalistic corporation

Originally Posted by dujac

i took several classes at university that fleshed it out quite well and have been behind the iron curtain

your assertion that you tube is a joke, it's a capitalistic corporation

When the government orders a private business to do something....it is communism. Did you look at any of these links? It's happening.

http://www.redstate.com/neil_stevens...ing-in-a-tree/

http://obamalies.net/google-lies.html

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1108/15487.html

http://thehill.com/blogs/hillicon-va...zy-with-google

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/watc...h-obama-admin/

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/obam...earch-results/

http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/0...dministration/

http://www.newsnmax.com/blog/Rush_Li...urpose_28.html
__________________
http://www.newenglishreview.org/file..._alinksy_3.jpg

Originally Posted by kk8

When the government orders a private business to do something....it is communism.

you're confusing communism with authoritarian

communism - a political theory derived from Karl Marx, advocating class war and leading to a society in which all property is publicly owned and each person works and is paid according to their abilities and needs.

authoritarian - favoring or enforcing strict obedience to authority, esp. that of the government, at the expense of personal freedom: the transition from an authoritarian to a democratic regime.

• showing a lack of concern for the wishes or opinions of others; domineering; dictatorial: he had an authoritarian and at times belligerent manner.

Originally Posted by kk8

Did you look at any of these links? It's happening.

http://www.redstate.com/neil_stevens...ing-in-a-tree/

yes, but i stopped after getting this from your first link: Error 404 - Not Found

not to mention that you seem to be oblivious to the benefits that come from nonpartisan info sources

you seem to prefer to swallow partisan political rhetoric then repost it like it's going out of style

Originally Posted by dujac

you're confusing communism with authoritarian

communism - a political theory derived from Karl Marx, advocating class war and leading to a society in which all property is publicly owned and each person works and is paid according to their abilities and needs.

authoritarian - favoring or enforcing strict obedience to authority, esp. that of the government, at the expense of personal freedom: the transition from an authoritarian to a democratic regime.

• showing a lack of concern for the wishes or opinions of others; domineering; dictatorial: he had an authoritarian and at times belligerent manner.





http://www.redstate.com/neil_stevens...ing-in-a-tree/

yes, but i stopped after getting this from your first link: Error 404 - Not Found

not to mention that you seem to be oblivious to the benefits that come from nonpartisan info sources

you seem to prefer to swallow partisan political rhetoric then repost it like it's going out of style

HAHA areyou saying that a communist government does not control what the population will read/see/write? REALLY? I'm not confusing anything.