Below are two stories involving MM and the filming of soldiers without their consent for his Croc-umentary F-911. I personally hope he gets whacked big time. So far this scam artist hasn't even done an interview with softball question thrower Larry King. Gee, I wonder why? The British have a great system for people like Moore, if you can't prove your claims against someone you are in big trouble.

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/ar...TICLE_ID=39466

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/ar...TICLE_ID=39465

I hope he gets soaked for every nickel that lying weasal has made off the "stupid americans" who went to see his movie of lies. maybe those hollywood nut jobs will help him pay his bill.

I find it interesting that a documentary using film footage would necessarily need to confide in every person shown. What about a shot of a football stadium? Does the film company need to get a letter from every person there? What is the law on this?

Just curious.

__________________
"What does a former president's son know about the Iraq war anyway?"
-- GW Bush when asked about Ron Reagan's negative comments, 6/25/2004.
www.BushZombie.com

You see mark, the law is that every time that there's a strong liberal voice, the cons will go to any lengths to silence him.

__________________
"The only thing we have to fear is four more years of George W. Bush." -Teddy Kennedy

liars are liars and they need to be deal with

If someone made a crocu-mentary on you being a child molester even though it wasn't true, because they hate every fiber of your being, is that fair.

Your generalized comment about being silenced is an absurd comment, I believe that the accusers of Clinton should be brought to the table. Like I mentioned, Britain has a good system for damaging the character of someone without proof.

but it's probably the same as tv. Generally, anyone that you are going to show on tv has to sign a release. For example, one day I was walking at 3rd st. promenade and they were filming a commercial. My friends and I walked through the shot, way back in the crowd mind you, but about 20 minutes later some poor pa comes running up to us and asked us to sign a release because we were in the shot. If any one of us hadn't signed, they would not have been able to use the shot. Nor would they contact us if we did end up in the spot. I would think that Moore would have to get signed releases from anyone that would be in his film. But, then again, I doubt Roger Smith signed a release for "Roger & Me."!

edited to say that it's pretty s***** of Moore to show that soldiers funeral without concent.

WOW, that really is low.

"A maggot that eats off the dead"

Please tell me if

a) you have seen the film

and

b) you can prove the film to be nothing but lies..

Thank you.

__________________
The last time this country mixed politics with religion, people got burned at the stake.

You can't...because you have been told the lie that it is full of lies. Before the movie even came out, people were claiming it was all lies. Its not. Research was done to complete the film, and most of it are actual clips from real people, not made up people. You need it to be lies, so that your precious presidents image isn't tarnished. Go back to your bed buddy Bill O'reilly and stop dreaming.