Page 15 of 32 FirstFirst ... 511121314151617181925 ... LastLast
Results 141 to 150 of 311

Thread: Russia Threatens PRE-EMPTIVE STRIKE AGAINST NATO Over Missile Defense

  1. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Grokmaster View Post
    Well, there you have it; if you wondered about all the "love and respect" the world has for The Chosen One, instead of that mean,ole, G W Bush, you now get the heads up: the Russians view the current commander-in-chief as the lameassd wimp who was wearing mommy pants while throwing a baseball, on worldwide TV...like a little girl.



    MOSCOW - Russia's top military officer has threatened to carry out a pre-emptive strike on U.S.-led NATO missile defence facilities in Eastern Europe if Washington goes ahead with its controversial plan to build a missile shield.
    President Dmitry Medvedev said last year that Russia will retaliate militarily if it does not reach an agreement with the United States and NATO on the missile defence system.

    Chief of General Staff Nikolai Makarov went even further Thursday. "A decision to use destructive force pre-emptively will be taken if the situation worsens," he said at an international conference attended by senior U.S. and NATO officials.

    Russian Defence Minister Anatoly Serdyukov also warned on Thursday that talks between Moscow and Washington on the topic are "close to a dead end."

    U.S. missile defence plans in Europe have been one of the touchiest subjects in U.S.-Russian relations for years.

    Moscow rejects Washington's claim that the missile defence plan is solely to deal with any Iranian missile threat and has voiced fears it will eventually become powerful enough to undermine Russia's nuclear deterrent. Moscow has proposed running the missile shield jointly with NATO, but the alliance has rejected that proposal.

    Makarov's statement on Thursday doesn't seem to imply an immediate threat, but aims to put extra pressure on Washington to agree to Russia's demands.



    http://news.yahoo.com/russias-milita...235743333.html


    Looks like Obama's desperate , caught-on-tape grovel to the Russians, begging them to "cut him some slack" until "after his re-election", failed to do anything, except expose his inherent WEAKNESS.

    Say what you will, but the Russians WOULD NEVER HAVE MADE SUCH A THREAT TO G W BUSH, and he had already stated, with NO GROVELING,that we were installing a MUCH MORE STRIDENT missile defense than the one Obama "plea grovelled down to"....

    Obama could start a war with Russia, sure republicans would... but he is not that stupid... and Russia is not that stupid either... ever played poker?
    ~
    belief is what is important, not so much what you believe, for instance, an ordinary sugar pill without belief helps no one, but with belief it can cure your ills and it can be quite the amazing little pill - the magic really comes from within

    ~


  2. #142

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by toddwv View Post
    Yes indeedy.
    Got a link showing that the Russians threatened to attack the USA under "W" Bush? I looked and the only thing I could see was that at one point they threatened to sue Bush for stealing from the IMF (which was hilarious, and hopefully, true)....
    ....

  3. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Grokmaster View Post
    Uh..no. Our missile defense is BASED on satellite tracking; has been for decades. you should leave the anarchy websites everynow and then,and get some current data.

    I support the US having the most advanced strategic weaponry,as well as missile defense, on the planet, as I am an American, lecking, Leftninny National Guilt.
    Anarchy website? The information is directly from the US Space Command. Did you even check the sources? 99% of those people in Central America being massacred were not communists by the way. Dont try me. I will destroy you on that topic. Ill be happy to give you a chance to prove me wrong.

  4. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Grokmaster View Post
    I'm saying that the communists were ALSO killing "villagers",and raping women as well, in most cases worse.
    So that made it okay for us to support death squads on the other side?

    I guess you believe that if capitalists are raping and murdering people that makes it fine.
    sputterman: "Aiding the enemy? If the truth aids the enemy then we are in the wrong war."

    Me: "When the people who teach our children, protect us from fires and criminals, save our lives when we're injured, and defend us with their very lives make less in a year than a guy who throws a ball for a living makes in an hour, there is something truly (*)(*)(*)(*)ed up with our country."

  5. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Questerr View Post
    Yeah. The M-4. Get a smidge of carbon in it and it becomes useless.

    Like I said, 26 silos in Alaska, 4 in California: http://www.spacenews.com/military/11...ct-boeing.html

    Oh, and according to Boeing each missile only carrying one kill vehicle: http://www.boeing.com/defense-space/...D_overview.pdf
    Mine has had more than a "smidge" in it, between cleanings. In one case, over 2000 rnds. And it is FAR from "useless"; it's light, compact,ACCURATE,and reliable.

    And how many missiles,and launchers, are at EACH LAUNCH SITE?
    "When the Electorate realizes they can vote themselves money from the Treasury, it will herald the end of the Republic." - Benjamin Franklin (most likely)



  6. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Pollycy View Post
    Got a link showing that the Russians threatened to attack the USA under "W" Bush? I looked and the only thing I could see was that at one point they threatened to sue Bush for stealing from the IMF (which was hilarious, and hopefully, true)....
    They threatened to place Iskander missiles in Kaliningrad. Those are considered first strike weapons.
    sputterman: "Aiding the enemy? If the truth aids the enemy then we are in the wrong war."

    Me: "When the people who teach our children, protect us from fires and criminals, save our lives when we're injured, and defend us with their very lives make less in a year than a guy who throws a ball for a living makes in an hour, there is something truly (*)(*)(*)(*)ed up with our country."

  7. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Grokmaster View Post
    Mine has had more than a "smidge" in it, between cleanings. In one case, over 2000 rnds. And it is FAR from "useless"; it's light, compact,ACCURATE,and reliable.

    And how many missiles,and launchers, are at EACH LAUNCH SITE?
    1. 1 per silo. 26 silos in Alaska. 4 in California.

    30 intercepters TOTAL.
    sputterman: "Aiding the enemy? If the truth aids the enemy then we are in the wrong war."

    Me: "When the people who teach our children, protect us from fires and criminals, save our lives when we're injured, and defend us with their very lives make less in a year than a guy who throws a ball for a living makes in an hour, there is something truly (*)(*)(*)(*)ed up with our country."

  8. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Grokmaster View Post
    I'm saying that the communists were ALSO killing "villagers",and raping women as well, in most cases worse.

    In additiojn, to the Russians building bullcrap, since..forever.
    Oh please come over to the military section and show me this communist conspiracy you describe. Enlighten me. I got my ammo dump right here, ready to go.

    Quote Originally Posted by Grokmaster View Post
    Uh..no. Our missile defense is BASED on satellite tracking; has been for decades. you should leave the anarchy websites everynow and then,and get some current data.
    For everyone to see for themselves if I got my information from an anarchy website as you say.. Russia Threatens PRE-EMPTIVE STRIKE AGAINST NATO Over Missile Defense

  9. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Questerr View Post
    So that made it okay for us to support death squads on the other side?

    I guess you believe that if capitalists are raping and murdering people that makes it fine.
    No communists were murdering people like he says man.
    Last edited by Horhey; May 04 2012 at 08:45 PM.

  10. #150

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Questerr View Post
    They threatened to place Iskander missiles in Kaliningrad. Those are considered first strike weapons.
    OK, the Russians were threatening to place missiles in Kaliningrad, Russia... their own soil, ostensibly to threaten the United States? The Iskander-E, which has the greater range, is definitely a threat up to about 500 kilometers, but from the proposed staging points east of Poland, they could hardly be considered a threat to the United States.

    Anyway, if that's all they have to scare Obama with, then he's even a bigger idiot than I thought. He may have forgotten that he is the Commander-in-Chief of a Navy that is equipped with a large fleet of Ohio-class nuclear submarines, each of which has lots of MIRV'd hydrogen bombs and thermobaric weapons for ready deployment. And those submarines are reputed to be able to go anywhere there's deep water, including under the ice off the northern coast of Russia.... And the Russian submarines? They're mostly found today in rusting piles of antiquated, obsolete crap, littering Russian Navy sea ports. It's funny... based on the facts, you'd think that it would be Putin who is trying hard to kiss Obama's ass, instead of the other way around....
    Last edited by Pollycy; May 04 2012 at 08:59 PM.
    ....

Page 15 of 32 FirstFirst ... 511121314151617181925 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Iran criticizes Turkey over missile defense shield
    By alan131210 in forum Middle East
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: Feb 09 2013, 09:25 AM
  2. Iranian general warned of a pre-emptive strike
    By Bishadi in forum Latest US & World News
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: May 07 2012, 05:56 PM
  3. Santorum Says He Would Threaten Air Strikes Against Iran
    By trucker in forum Latest US & World News
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: Jan 01 2012, 01:21 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks