Thread: So is there ANY evidence that Zimmerman threw the first punch?

With the liberal lynch mob's "case" coming apart at the seems, this is an appropriate question to ask. No, I don't want to read any ignorant garbage about Zimmerman *gasp* getting out of his vehicle in his owned (*)(*)(*)(*)ed neighborhood to keep an eye on a casing suspect until police arrived, because (1) this was completely legal-I defy anyone to cite a law preventing one person from following, and thereby assisting in the apprehension of, a suspect-and everyone who is not mentally retarded knows this, and (2) following Martin, in the context of a time and place where burglaries were rampant, and whereby Martin was walking slowly in bad weather, trying to look inside houses, was completely justified.

Now that there is absolutely no doubt that Martin was assaulting Zimmerman and placing him in fear for his life, and now that it has been established that Zimmerman had not only the right but just cause to maintain a line of sight to Martin (liberal tyrannical statist B.S. about us not being free to LOOK AT and MAINTAIN A LINE OF SIGHT TO suspicious strangers notwithstanding, as per the previous paragraph), I will ask the key question for the hate mongering, jump-to-conclusions (Atlanta 1996, Duke college students, many other examples, and now THIS) liberals: Is there any evidence that Zimmerman threw the first punch?

If I see ANY of the overused B.S. that I have specifically excluded from this thread, I will ask the moderators to delete it and discipline you for an off-topic post in this important thread.

It is possible that Zimmerman was such a bad fighter that he tried assaulting Martin with his nose and the back of his head but i doubt it!

Originally Posted by Truthist

With the liberal lynch mob's "case" coming apart at the seems, this is an appropriate question to ask. No, I don't want to read any ignorant garbage about Zimmerman *gasp* getting out of his vehicle in his owned (*)(*)(*)(*)ed neighborhood to keep an eye on a casing suspect until police arrived, because (1) this was completely legal-I defy anyone to cite a law preventing one person from following, and thereby assisting in the apprehension of, a suspect-and everyone who is not mentally retarded knows this, and (2) following Martin, in the context of a time and place where burglaries were rampant, and whereby Martin was walking slowly in bad weather, trying to look inside houses, was completely justified.

Now that there is absolutely no doubt that Martin was assaulting Zimmerman and placing him in fear for his life, and now that it has been established that Zimmerman had not only the right but just cause to maintain a line of sight to Martin (liberal tyrannical statist B.S. about us not being free to LOOK AT and MAINTAIN A LINE OF SIGHT TO suspicious strangers notwithstanding, as per the previous paragraph), I will ask the key question for the hate mongering, jump-to-conclusions (Atlanta 1996, Duke college students, many other examples, and now THIS) liberals: Is there any evidence that Zimmerman threw the first punch?

If I see ANY of the overused B.S. that I have specifically excluded from this thread, I will ask the moderators to delete it and discipline you for an off-topic post in this important thread.

Assisting in the apprehension of a suspect????

Are you kidding me?

Line of sight? You are supposed to stand back 50 yards or go home. The police don't want amateurs and civilians in their way.

Trayvon probably threw the first punch and knocked GZ down.. and would not have done so if GZ had identified himself and not shown a gun.

Someone said that this was death by dumbassery by GZ.. I concur.

thread needs a link to be here in current events