Thread: Balck on White Crime? No Problemo With Liberals

Originally Posted by Sadanie

The torture and killing of these two young people was atrocious.

But it was NOT covered up, and the REAL torture that took place were in fact MUCH amplified by the media and racists. . .as if the REA, factual acts of savagery were not enough and needed "embelishing!"

And each one of those criminal was tried and convicted of murder. Because the judge was drunk during proceeding, a NEW trial is being scheduled.

NO cover up there, but racism is obviously jumping on the fact that the victims were White, and the killers Black to amplify the the already (and abolutely understandable) outrage about this extreme case of violence. . . Which was NOT based on race.

You can't really get into the heads of non-humans to know what it was based on. Perhaps, they didn't like their cologne. Yes, it was amplified, but do a few more google searches and you can see what happened and its not that far off.

My tin foil hat sometimes wonders in these weird circumstances if they are not "experiments" run amok. You know they (three letter agency) did that in the 60's and 70's? It was exposed in a 1973 Congressional investigation that you can read online.

Originally Posted by texmaster

Please tell me you aren't pretending your personal experiences can be applied to an entire nation.

Shouldn't this comment apply just as well to crusader's personal experience in Oakland? I know Oakland, and East Palo Alto, and have NEVER been (or felt ) threatened in either cities!

Originally Posted by Sadanie

Shouldn't this comment apply just as well to crusader's personal experience in Oakland? I know Oakland, and East Palo Alto, and have NEVER been (or felt ) threatened in either cities!

That's right, Sadanie! You tell 'em!

Originally Posted by Sadanie

The torture and killing of these two young people was atrocious.

But it was NOT covered up, and the REAL torture that took place were in fact MUCH amplified by the media and racists. . .as if the REA, factual acts of savagery were not enough and needed "embelishing!"

And each one of those criminal was tried and convicted of murder. Because the judge was drunk during proceeding, a NEW trial is being scheduled.

NO cover up there, but racism is obviously jumping on the fact that the victims were White, and the killers Black to amplify the the already (and abolutely understandable) outrage about this extreme case of violence. . . Which was NOT based on race.

Not covered up? Even Snopes admits it got no coverage. Remember that Black man from Texas that was dragged to death behind a pickup truck a few years ago? That was bad and got the coverage it deserved, That was all over the National news. Not this and it was much worse.

Originally Posted by Marine1

Not covered up? Even Snopes admits it got no coverage. Remember that Black man from Texas that was dragged to death behind a pickup truck a few years ago? That was bad and got the coverage it deserved, That was all over the National news. Not this and it was much worse.

Do you think it was about race or..the crime itself? That's a fairy tale nightmare, Marine1.

White on Black crime fits the liberal narrative that white people are evil oppressors and blacks are victims. So these stories must be thoroughly reported.

Black gangbangers and mobs and black racists do not fit the narrative, and for liberals, to report on such things just further victimizes the poor black man. Hence, silence.

That is prettty much the bottom line on how the media reports this stuff.

Originally Posted by CatholicCrusader

White on Black crime fits the liberal narrative that white people are evil oppressors and blacks are victims. So these stories must be thoroughly reported.

Black gangbangers and mobs and black racists do not fit the narrative, and for liberals, to report on such things just further victimizes the poor black man. Hence, silence.

That is prettty much the bottom line on how the media reports this stuff.

Many of these leftists enjoy hearing stories of black on white violence. Many are upset that more whites are not being beaten and/or killed. We have left-wingers on this forum that pine over the fact that blacks have not killed every last white man, woman, and child in South Africa (although they are certainly trying to, based on crime statistics in that country). As sick as their mindset is, the worst part is that most of them are too cowardly to come out and admit to their true feelings. Many put out weak apologetic "I don't support this" blanket condemnations for when blacks start killing whites, but deep down they feel this is justified retribution. That's the sickness of the left.

Originally Posted by CatholicCrusader

White on Black crime fits the liberal narrative that white people are evil oppressors and blacks are victims. So these stories must be thoroughly reported.

Black gangbangers and mobs and black racists do not fit the narrative, and for liberals, to report on such things just further victimizes the poor black man. Hence, silence.

That is prettty much the bottom line on how the media reports this stuff.

Okay, it is officially too thick to wade through anymore...I'm out.

Originally Posted by Marine1

Not covered up? Even Snopes admits it got no coverage.

Snopes admitted why too. You appear to have overlooked that part for some reason.

http://www.snopes.com/politics/crime/newsom.asp;

It is true that the bulk of the initial news reportage about the Newsom/Christian murders was local (predominantly in Tennessee, where the crimes took place, and in neighboring Kentucky) while the case received little or no national coverage by major news outlets, a phenomenon some attributed to racial bias on the part of the national news media. However, the fact is that only a tiny handful of the approximately 15,000 murders that occur in the United States every year makes national news, and the cases that do tend to attract prolonged, nationwide coverage are ones exhibiting a combination of factors (e.g., scandal, mystery, sexual elements, celebrity involvement, shockingly large numbers of deaths, murders of children and other victims who elicit especial sympathy) that makes them particularly fascinating and compelling to the public at large...

Originally Posted by HonestJoe

Snopes admitted why too. You appear to have overlooked that part for some reason.

http://www.snopes.com/politics/crime/newsom.asp;

What a lame excuse. You think that if a group of whites captured two blacks and raped and tortured them for days, it would have only received local news coverage? How obtuse.