Thread: Rush Limbaugh has an INSANE new theory.

Why is that fat druggie still alive?

Originally Posted by Tipper101

The only opinion Rush gave on this subject is that he believes Obama's people will be drawing up these ridiculous comparisons in an attempt at influencing brain-dead voters at the polls. That's pretty much it.

Nowhere did he even bring up the intentions of the movie-makers, let alone give an opinion one way or the other.

...so, once again, we have what Rush says and the Lib's interpretation of what Rush says being completely different. Super weird.

That's no less off the wall and stupid than saying Chris Nolan was deliberately casting Bane to help Obama.

And by the way, it was conservative idiots who created the infamously retarded Obama Joker-face poster.

Originally Posted by Phil

If I still had my radio show I would have said the same thing. Obviously they weren't thinking about Romney in 1993 when they wrote the comic book, but when they were selecting a villain for this film two years ago it wasn't hard to guess who the 2012 Republican nominee would be. Bane beat out stalwarts like the Riddler, Penguin, Mad Hatter, Mr. Freeze, Puzzler, False Face, Egghead, the Bookworm, Fingers, Black Widow, Sandman and Shame.

Bane was chosen because he was the only one to "break" the Batman character. This film is intended to be the end of the legend, or adaptation of "Knightfall", written in 1993. Get it together, folks.

Originally Posted by Tipper101

The only opinion Rush gave on this subject is that he believes Obama's people will be drawing up these ridiculous comparisons in an attempt at influencing brain-dead voters at the polls. That's pretty much it.

Nowhere did he even bring up the intentions of the movie-makers, let alone give an opinion one way or the other.

...so, once again, we have what Rush says and the Lib's interpretation of what Rush says being completely different. Super weird.

No one was even talking about this until Rush brought it up.

Originally Posted by The Real American Thinker

That's no less off the wall and stupid than saying Chris Nolan was deliberately casting Bain to help Obama.

...so you admit you were completely wrong in your original assessment. Given that you had the audio and transcript right in front of you, I don't think a discussion about whether or not Obama's people would or would not draw up comparisons is even necessary: you've already discredited yourself, and your current reassessment is, as far as i'm concerned, disqualified. Good bye.

Originally Posted by Defengar

No one was even talking about this until Rush brought it up.

Oh really? because rush's take seems to be purely reactionary, and he, several times, brings up that fact.

And there's now a discussion out there as to whether or not this is purposeful and whether or not it will influence voters.

The thought is that when they start paying attention to the campaign later in the year....

Now, there's a story in the Washington Times Communities today: "Is Mitt Romney...Batman? --

There are some people who think it'll work. Others think you're really underestimating the American people to think that will work.

Rush references a news source in his reaction, which is more than I can say for you.

Originally Posted by Tipper101

...so you admit you were completely wrong in your original assessment. Given that you had the audio and transcript right in front of you, I don't think a discussion about whether or not Obama's people would or would not draw up comparisons is even necessary: you've already discredited yourself, and your current reassessment is, as far as i'm concerned, disqualified. Good bye.

...no, I admitted no such thing. I was commenting on the OP's assessment.

You're only "disqualifying" my assessment because it calls Limbaugh out on his stupid bull(*)(*)(*)(*).

You know what I find the most amusing about all this is the fact that Libs will take, spin, and run with a story like this, while, on the exact same page of Rush's website, is an actual opinion of Rush's that they don't even need to spin in order to get mad about.

Barack Obama's Declaration of War Against the Way America was Founded and Built

But no, they ignore this glaring title located at the top of his website, and scroll down to what they think is the real juicy controversy. So i'm not sure at this moment whether to consider their actions dishonest or incompetent at this point....I suppose given that they are clearly not really listening to what Rush is saying, i'm leaning towards "incompetent", but the jury is still out.

Originally Posted by The Real American Thinker

...no, I admitted no such thing. I was commenting on the OP's assessment.

Oh? then you're going to double down on it then? Then please provide proof that Rush thinks that

Christopher Nolan is somehow casting Bane as the villain to somehow draw a connection to Romney to get Obama re-elected

Originally Posted by Tipper101

You know what I find the most amusing about all this is the fact that Libs will take, spin, and run with a story like this, while, on the exact same page of Rush's website, is an actual opinion of Rush's that they don't even need to spin in order to get mad about.

But no, they ignore this glaring title located at the top of his website, and scroll down to what they think is the real juicy controversy. So i'm not sure at this moment whether to consider their actions dishonest or incompetent at this point....I suppose given that they are clearly not really listening to what Rush is saying, i'm leaning towards "incompetent", but the jury is still out.

I'm a liberal and I never visit Limbaugh's website, so I have no way of knowing what he posts unless someone brings it up.

But even if I did, I am not now, nor ever have been an Obama supporter. So I don't care.

I only really bothered with this because I'm a comic geek and hate when people try to spin comic stories to suit political agendas.