love to spend doesn't have the bawls to tax http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/080204/bush_budget.html the blind leading the blind Those who voted for the guy TWO TIMES are idiots. Will this post get me to 50 in the red???

So, by your calculations, does that mean that those who voted against the guy two times, were LOSERS?

I thought this was the autobiography forum...

My mistake!

__________________
"The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but the heart of the fool to the left."
Ecclesiastes 10:2 (NIV)

maybe not losers but certainly not leaders, so that would make them gullible followers right? I mean who pays Limbaugh, Coulter and Fox, has to be a lot of them whoever they are.

You are ABSOLUTELY right. So if YOU did not vote for Bush, the past two elections, then you are nothing but a gullible follower. Thank you for completely understanding, and validating my argument.

...for the win!

Oh, is that how that works? Gee, I never seen an actual "red" before.... but now that I look.... yep, there it is.

Well, look, cresty my friend, I know you'd like to hit that milestone, but really, I try not to give out negs to people. Although, I might start on JP a little, you know, if I give her one every time she tells a fib, then it won't take long before she's in the red too!

(j/k of course, really, these points are kinda hilarious, but ah, I don't think I'd neg someone, you know.... why bother? )

Hey, so ah, you know, I'm about to (*)(*)(*)(*) these guys off big-time, I'm gonna have to tell 'em something no one wants to hear, but hey, they're gettin' ripped off, and I mean, if "I" were gettin' ripped off, I'd want someone to let me know about it, wouldn't you?

So, you know - what was that Bushism? Oh yeah - "expend my political capital" - that's what I'm gonna have to do here....