Thread: Gallup unemployment continues to fall: New low of 7.3%.

Originally Posted by Iriemon

They major policies were passed an implement in February 2009 and implemented through 2009 and 2010, when we had the strongest periods of growth.

Since the Obstructionists Republicans took House in Jan 2010, growth has continued, but considerably slower.

Which of course feeds into their top priority.

So we agree, since the stalemate has started, Obama has been a big zero.

Yet unemployment has easily fallen the most...and the deficit has decreased...and 401k's are higher than ever.

I doubt the average american really cares about what figures the government spits out in their GDP calculations.

Originally Posted by coolguybrad

So we agree, since the stalemate has started, Obama has been a big zero.

Why would you think I agree with that?

Why would an unbiased, nonpartisan person like yourself claim Obama has been a "big zero" when it has been the Republican party that blocked his efforts? And yet you never put any blame on the Republicans.

A closet Tea Partier. I don't blame you for not admitting it publicly.

Originally Posted by Iriemon

Why would you think I agree with that?

Why would an unbiased, nonpartisan person like yourself claim Obama has been a "big zero" when it has been the Republican party that blocked his efforts? And yet you never put any blame on the Republicans.

A closet Tea Partier. I don't blame you for not admitting it publicly.

Non-rebuttal. Points proven once again.

Originally Posted by Iriemon

Ooops what? The Labor department has nothing to do with Gallup.

You're just demonstrating your ignorance again.

Oops is that the entire drop in unemployment is based upon one of the state NOT REPORTING THEIR FIGURES.

As we expected. This was all a bunch of bull sh!t!

Originally Posted by keymanjim

Oops is that the entire drop in unemployment is based upon one of the state NOT REPORTING THEIR FIGURES.

As we expected. This was all a bunch of bull sh!t!

Dude, you keep confusing the BLS with Gallup.

Gallup does its own independent polling. Whatever the Department of Labor may have done is irrelevant. It has nothing to do with Gallup.

The bull(*)(*)(*)(*) is that you simply don't understand the data, as you have repeatedly demonstrated in this thread.

Originally Posted by Iriemon

Dude, you keep confusing the BLS with Gallup.

You are perpetuating a LIE!

Originally Posted by keymanjim

You are perpetuating a LIE!

Oh, I like the way you used the bigger font and bold. It makes your baseless statement sound so much more impressive.

I used a bigger and "colored" font for this post because I know that will make it more convincy to you!

Originally Posted by keymanjim

You are perpetuating a LIE!

Oh, I like the way you used the bigger font and bold. It makes your baseless statement sound so much more impressive.

I used a bigger and "colored" font for this post because I know that will make it more convincy to you!

I actually do not think it will help B.Hussein Obama. Couple things, not always consistent with each other:
1) He belongs to the "never let a good crisis go to waste" administration. Did he prolong the crisis thinking it would bring the country to the left?;
2) Too little too late. There is an argument that unemployment never should have gone over 8%, but then again, this is the "never let a good crisis..." y'know;
3) The administration has some control on unemployment and only boosted it now that they absolutely need to do so;
4) This is sheer luck and nothing to do with the administration. Romney will handle the economy and jobs better.
or
5) the numbers are a frake: http://www.rocklandtimes.com/2012/10...t-dip-is-fake/

Some of these may be true, others maybe. I think Obama has one line: without him it would have been worse. That is the only line that will help, and I think most people will disregard it. I don't think these numbers will help.

Originally Posted by gorfias

I actually do not think it will help B.Hussein Obama. Couple things, not always consistent with each other:
1) He belongs to the "never let a good crisis go to waste" administration. Did he prolong the crisis thinking it would bring the country to the left?;
2) Too little too late. There is an argument that unemployment never should have gone over 8%, but then again, this is the "never let a good crisis..." y'know;
3) The administration has some control on unemployment and only boosted it now that they absolutely need to do so;
4) This is sheer luck and nothing to do with the administration. Romney will handle the economy and jobs better.
or
5) the numbers are a frake: http://www.rocklandtimes.com/2012/10...t-dip-is-fake/

Some of these may be true, others maybe. I think Obama has one line: without him it would have been worse. That is the only line that will help, and I think most people will disregard it. I don't think these numbers will help.

You really figure that Obama's plan was to make the economy worse?

Doesn't sound like a way to try to get re-elected to me.