![]() |
|
|
||||
|
http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/...nce/index.html
OTHER THAN the typical "layer of bureucracy" argument, can anyone explain to me why making this position a cabinet level position with budgetary powers and oversight of ALL of the intelligence community is an idea Bush won't support? Is it the same situation as when he opposed making the Homeland Security Director cabinet level because he'd have to answer to Congress? Will this be another paper tiger thrown out by Bush to make it look like he's doing something? |
| Sponsored Links |
| Red Cross - Donate Today Save the Rainforest |
|
|||
|
If he/she is not a member of the cabinet he/she can be thrown under the bus without making it look like the pResident is out of touch...
__________________
The last time this country mixed politics with religion, people got burned at the stake. |
|
|||
|
This individual will have absolutely "NO POWER"!! He may actually be reporting to the Pentagon, in other words RUMMY! If you look closely at Junior's proposal, he is only doing it to "appease" the 9-11 commission.
But most Americans will buy it "hook, line and sinker". And he was against the position to begin with. BTW..That is "not" a FLIP/FLOP!! The wool continues to be pulled over "our eyes"!! |
|
|||
|
It's funny an adult could make a statement like this in seriousness. Have you fantasized yourself into a relationship with the guy? How can you state what he thinks?
|
|
||||
|
Quote:
But it's naive to say Bush is making this decision based on "future presidents." This is a president that doesn't want to have to answer to ANYONE. If he can set up a system where he can keep his appointees on a short leash, with no accountability to anyone but him (or his lackeys), he will. That's why he wants this to be a non-Cabinet position, so he can appoint a new DCI who will oversee this new position -- and nothing will have changed. It's a control issue, nothing more. |
|
||||
|
You're just spinning and weaving your own little story. Pres. Bush does NOT operate that way. Keep in mind: whatever he puts in place EVEN the next Democrat president will operate under. So, if he were making something good for himself....just for personal reasons.......then he's also making it good for the next Democrat president. And I have absolutely NO DOUBT that had Bush said the guy needed to be in the Cabinet.....that you would have been saying, "the guy will be nothing but an arm of Bush and will have no autonomy." WHATEVER Bush thought was the right way to go........you'd have taken the opposite position. Just like John Kerry does....
|
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
|||
|
Quote:
You know him better because he was your Governor or because you have/had a "personal relationship" with him? You know, JEB is my Governor too. If I told you "horror stories" about his reign and claimed I know because he is my governor, would you buy that? You are so full of cr** that its not oozing out..ITS FLOWING OUT!! |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|