Political Forum
     

Go Back   Political Forum > General Political Chat > Current Events


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #121 (permalink)  
Old 03-29-2008, 07:19 AM
Toby Toby is offline
Analyst
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 2,183
usa us north carolina
Toby has a brilliant futureToby has a brilliant futureToby has a brilliant futureToby has a brilliant futureToby has a brilliant futureToby has a brilliant futureToby has a brilliant futureToby has a brilliant futureToby has a brilliant futureToby has a brilliant futureToby has a brilliant future
Credits: 15,228
Default

[quote=Taomon;473326] What is the truth?
  • Quote:
    Originally Posted by Taomon View Post
  • That we invaded and now occupy a country?
  • Name a single war where we just got up and left after the initial invasion was over! Japan? Germany? Korea? Philippines? Cuba? You would have us simply leave Iraq defenseless smack dab in between Iran and Syrea? THATS NOT TO SMART NOW IS IT? You amaze me. Why do you even try to make this stupid arguement when you know better?


    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Taomon View Post
  • That there were no WMD?
  • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1_Cep...md_quotes.html


    "People can quarrel with whether we should have more troops in Afghanistan or internationalize Iraq or whatever, but it is incontestable that on the day I left office, there were unaccounted for stocks of biological and chemical weapons."



    Former President Clinton
    During an interview on CNN's "Larry King Live"
    July 22, 2003


    http://freedomagenda.com/iraq/wmd_qu...tml#wR6nIpoLli

    http://www.cnn.com/2003/ALLPOLITICS/...ton.iraq.sotu/



    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Taomon View Post
  • That the death of Saddam Hussein has destabalized the region?
  • YOUR DESTABLEIZED REIGION!



    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Taomon View Post
  • That Bush and his henchmen have no idea what the (*)(*)(*)(*) they are doing?
  • NAME ONE WAR THAT AMERICA HAS FOUGHT THAT HAS GONE AS PLANNED!

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Taomon View Post
    That you bought into the lies from military commanders to make it easier for you to kill Iraqis who are trying to protect their homeland?
    WHO IS TRYING TO KILL IRAQIS? HOW MANY IRAQI HOMES HAVE YOU WALKED IN ON WHERE YOU FOUND THE HEADS OF DECAPITATED CHILDREN? WHY WERE THEY DECAPITATED YOU SAY? BECAUSE THEIR FATHER WORKED WITH COALITION FORCES! HOW MANY TIMES HAVE YOU SEEN AN IRAQI GOVENER UNDER GO MURDERS AND KIDNAPPINGS IN HIS OWN FAMILY BECAUSE HE SUPPORTS THE IRAQI DEMOCRACY? HOW MANY TIMES HAVE YOU SEEN INSURGENTS USE MOSQUES, HOSPITALS, SCHOOLS, AND HOMES OF THE INNOCENT, TO FIRE AT US MARINES? HOW MANY IED'S HAVE YOU SEEN BLOW UP IN CROWDED MARKETPLACES WITH A COMPLEAT DISREGUARD FOR THE WOMEN CHILDREN AND CIVILIANS THEY KILL? HOW DARE YOU BLAME THE DEATHS OF INNOCENT IRAQIS ON OUR TROOPS! HOW DARE YOU BLAME OUR TROOPS FOR THE ACTIONS OF A BRUTAL TERRORIST ENEMY! YOUR FRIGGIN DISCUSTING!

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Taomon View Post
  • That this is really about oil and money?

IT LOOKS LIKE ALL THESE PEOPLE VOTED FOR BUSH TO GET OIL AND MONEY? HMMMMMM.. NOPE! THAT DOESENT MAKE TOO MUCH SINCE DOES IT?


U.S. Senate Roll Call Votes 107th Congress - 2nd Session

as compiled through Senate LIS by the Senate Bill Clerk under the direction of the Secretary of the Senate


Vote Summary

Question: On the Joint Resolution (H.J.Res. 114 )
Vote Number: 237 Vote Date: October 11, 2002, 12:50 AM
Required For Majority: 1/2 Vote Result: Joint Resolution Passed
Measure Number: H.J.Res. 114
Measure Title: A joint resolution to authorize the use of United States Armed Forces against Iraq.
Vote Counts: YEAs 77
NAYs 23
Vote Summary By Senator Name By Vote Position By Home State


Alphabetical by Senator Name
Akaka (D-HI), Nay
Allard (R-CO), Yea
Allen (R-VA), Yea
Baucus (D-MT), Yea
Bayh (D-IN), Yea
Bennett (R-UT), Yea
Biden (D-DE), Yea
Bingaman (D-NM), Nay
Bond (R-MO), Yea
Boxer (D-CA), Nay
Breaux (D-LA), Yea
Brownback (R-KS), Yea
Bunning (R-KY), Yea
Burns (R-MT), Yea
Byrd (D-WV), Nay
Campbell (R-CO), Yea
Cantwell (D-WA), Yea
Carnahan (D-MO), Yea
Carper (D-DE), Yea
Chafee (R-RI), Nay
Cleland (D-GA), Yea
Clinton (D-NY), Yea
Cochran (R-MS), Yea
Collins (R-ME), Yea
Conrad (D-ND), Nay
Corzine (D-NJ), Nay
Craig (R-ID), Yea
Crapo (R-ID), Yea
Daschle (D-SD), Yea
Dayton (D-MN), Nay
DeWine (R-OH), Yea
Dodd (D-CT), Yea
Domenici (R-NM), Yea
Dorgan (D-ND), Yea
Durbin (D-IL), Nay
Edwards (D-NC), Yea
Ensign (R-NV), Yea
Enzi (R-WY), Yea
Feingold (D-WI), Nay
Feinstein (D-CA), Yea
Fitzgerald (R-IL), Yea
Frist (R-TN), Yea
Graham (D-FL), Nay
Gramm (R-TX), Yea
Grassley (R-IA), Yea
Gregg (R-NH), Yea
Hagel (R-NE), Yea
Harkin (D-IA), Yea
Hatch (R-UT), Yea
Helms (R-NC), Yea
Hollings (D-SC), Yea
Hutchinson (R-AR), Yea
Hutchison (R-TX), Yea
Inhofe (R-OK), Yea
Inouye (D-HI), Nay
Jeffords (I-VT), Nay
Johnson (D-SD), Yea
Kennedy (D-MA), Nay
Kerry (D-MA), Yea
Kohl (D-WI), Yea
Kyl (R-AZ), Yea
Landrieu (D-LA), Yea
Leahy (D-VT), Nay
Levin (D-MI), Nay
Lieberman (D-CT), Yea
Lincoln (D-AR), Yea
Lott (R-MS), Yea
Lugar (R-IN), Yea
McCain (R-AZ), Yea
McConnell (R-KY), Yea
Mikulski (D-MD), Nay
Miller (D-GA), Yea
Murkowski (R-AK), Yea
Murray (D-WA), Nay
Nelson (D-FL), Yea
Nelson (D-NE), Yea
Nickles (R-OK), Yea
Reed (D-RI), Nay
Reid (D-NV), Yea
Roberts (R-KS), Yea
Rockefeller (D-WV), Yea
Santorum (R-PA), Yea
Sarbanes (D-MD), Nay
Schumer (D-NY), Yea
Sessions (R-AL), Yea
Shelby (R-AL), Yea
Smith (R-NH), Yea
Smith (R-OR), Yea
Snowe (R-ME), Yea
Specter (R-PA), Yea
Stabenow (D-MI), Nay
Stevens (R-AK), Yea
Thomas (R-WY), Yea
Thompson (R-TN), Yea
Thurmond (R-SC), Yea
Torricelli (D-NJ), Yea
Voinovich (R-OH), Yea
Warner (R-VA), Yea
Wellstone (D-MN), Nay
Wyden (D-OR), Nay

Last edited by Toby; 03-29-2008 at 07:20 AM.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Red Cross - Donate Today    Save the Rainforest
  #122 (permalink)  
Old 03-29-2008, 08:09 AM
FlackBait's Avatar
FlackBait FlackBait is offline
Sr. Correspondent
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 685
usa us california
FlackBait has disabled reputation
Credits: 3,521
Default .:.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toby View Post
There is no opposing view! They have all seen the truth with their own eyes!
Whaaatever.
Reply With Quote
  #123 (permalink)  
Old 03-29-2008, 08:10 AM
Taomon's Avatar
Taomon Taomon is offline
Commentator
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: South Shore MA
Age: 40
Posts: 1,191
usa us massachusetts
Taomon is a jewel in the roughTaomon is a jewel in the roughTaomon is a jewel in the rough
Credits: 4,903
Send a message via Yahoo to Taomon
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toby View Post
Name a single war where we just got up and left after the initial invasion was over! Japan? Germany? Korea? Philippines? Cuba? You would have us simply leave Iraq defenseless smack dab in between Iran and Syria? THATS NOT TO SMART NOW IS IT? You amaze me. Why do you even try to make this stupid argument when you know better?
I would have us not invade and then occupy. Okay, we f'ed up and now we have to stay and continue to do damage?

I have a better idea. We apologize to the world for allowing Bush & Cheney to lead us astray. Then we build a true coalition from the UN of countries (not previously involved in this affair - that is you Turkey, Australia, Britain and Canada) to rebuild Iraq and let them truly choose the government that they want. We then pull all US companies from Iraq...all of them. And then we make them all pay a percentage of the profits earned since 2003 for that region back into social programs in Iraq.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Toby View Post
"People can quarrel with whether we should have more troops in Afghanistan or internationalize Iraq or whatever, but it is incontestable that on the day I left office, there were unaccounted for stocks of biological and chemical weapons."
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toby View Post


Former President Clinton
During an interview on CNN's "Larry King Live"
July 22, 2003


http://freedomagenda.com/iraq/wmd_qu...tml#wR6nIpoLli

http://www.cnn.com/2003/ALLPOLITICS/...ton.iraq.sotu/
And have any been found? No. Why? Because the WMDs that we sold to Saddam Hussein in the 1980's were used on Iranians, Kurds and US troops during the first Gulf War. The sanctions placed on Iraq and the work of the UN weapons inspectors destroyed any possibility of Iraq being armed with WMD. The Stinger missiles that we gave to the Afghanistan Freedom Fighters were not all accountable, this is true. And the Taliban & al Qaeda were allowed to flourish during George H.W. Bush's and Bill Clinton's administration.

Now, Clinton was trying, weakly, to get Osama bin Laden and al Qaeda. Treatises we have with Saudi Arabia stopped us from doing it. But George W Bush's administration were warned and they did nothing. After 9/11 they suddenly take action by carpet bombing Afghanistan (rather than apprehending Taliban & al Qaeda operatives and sparing the lives of countless civilian Afghans). They also ensured that our civil liberties at home were taken away with the Patriot act, domestic spying and who knows what other programs.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Toby View Post
And that was taken right after Saddam's execution. What is the situation now? If the area is not destabilized, then why can we not leave?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toby View Post
NAME ONE WAR THAT AMERICA HAS FOUGHT THAT HAS GONE AS PLANNED!
Name one war that America fought based on lies...oh yeah, that would be all of them.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toby View Post
WHO IS TRYING TO KILL IRAQIS? HOW MANY IRAQI HOMES HAVE YOU WALKED IN ON WHERE YOU FOUND THE HEADS OF DECAPITATED CHILDREN? WHY WERE THEY DECAPITATED YOU SAY? BECAUSE THEIR FATHER WORKED WITH COALITION FORCES! HOW MANY TIMES HAVE YOU SEEN AN IRAQI GOVENER UNDER GO MURDERS AND KIDNAPPINGS IN HIS OWN FAMILY BECAUSE HE SUPPORTS THE IRAQI DEMOCRACY? HOW MANY TIMES HAVE YOU SEEN INSURGENTS USE MOSQUES, HOSPITALS, SCHOOLS, AND HOMES OF THE INNOCENT, TO FIRE AT US MARINES? HOW MANY IED'S HAVE YOU SEEN BLOW UP IN CROWDED MARKETPLACES WITH A COMPLEAT DISREGUARD FOR THE WOMEN CHILDREN AND CIVILIANS THEY KILL? HOW DARE YOU BLAME THE DEATHS OF INNOCENT IRAQIS ON OUR TROOPS! HOW DARE YOU BLAME OUR TROOPS FOR THE ACTIONS OF A BRUTAL TERRORIST ENEMY! YOUR FRIGGIN DISCUSTING!
How Dare I? Because our troops are not angels. They have a duty...to kill. The mercenary armies that we hired are killing civilians, which angers the populace. They retaliate, and they do not see one army or another...they are all American to them...and those mercenary armies are American people - armed and dangerous.

Look at the pictures from Gitmo & Abu Ghraib, how dare you yell at me about how innocent our troops are when we see evidence of them committing atrocities.

Fallujah was an act of revenge for the deaths of three Blackwater mercenaries. An entire district was attacked, including civilians.

There is film footage of an IED exploding and an American battalion opening fire on a children's soccer game (as they fired in every possible direction).

There is countless footage of door-to-door raids by our service men & women as they violate the culture and rights of the Iraqi civilian population.

How much do we not see? How dare YOU attack ME when we both know that war is hell and there are always civilian casualties...especially when a country (the US) invades and occupies another country. But these are people we are talking about. If you truly cared about Iraqi civilians and the stability of that country, you would have us leave as well. We are the aggressors here so don't try and sugarcoat it by saying that a worse fate waits for Iraqis if we leave when we are the big bad wolf.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Toby View Post
IT LOOKS LIKE ALL THESE PEOPLE VOTED FOR BUSH TO GET OIL AND MONEY? HMMMMMM.. NOPE! THAT DOESENT MAKE TOO MUCH SINCE DOES IT?


U.S. Senate Roll Call Votes 107th Congress - 2nd Session

as compiled through Senate LIS by the Senate Bill Clerk under the direction of the Secretary of the Senate
Based on lies that the Bush Administration cherry-picked from historical reports. Saddam was more of a threat to our security when he was in our pocket during the Reagan years.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toby View Post
Question: On the Joint Resolution (H.J.Res. 114 )
Vote Number: 237 Vote Date: October 11, 2002, 12:50 AM
Required For Majority: 1/2 Vote Result: Joint Resolution Passed
Measure Number: H.J.Res. 114
Measure Title: A joint resolution to authorize the use of United States Armed Forces against Iraq.
Vote Counts: YEAs 77
NAYs 23
Vote Summary By Senator Name By Vote Position By Home State
So you don't blame Bush for lying to Congress or the UN...you blame Congress for believing the lies that Bush put together?

So if one of your kids lies to you and your wife, and you find out later that your kid lied, you would blame your wife?

__________________
Tantum religio potuit suadere malorum
(To such heights of evil are men driven by religion)
Reply With Quote
  #124 (permalink)  
Old 03-29-2008, 08:12 AM
Taomon's Avatar
Taomon Taomon is offline
Commentator
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: South Shore MA
Age: 40
Posts: 1,191
usa us massachusetts
Taomon is a jewel in the roughTaomon is a jewel in the roughTaomon is a jewel in the rough
Credits: 4,903
Send a message via Yahoo to Taomon
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by C-D-P View Post
You sure do assume a lot.
Look who is talking
__________________
Tantum religio potuit suadere malorum
(To such heights of evil are men driven by religion)
Reply With Quote
  #125 (permalink)  
Old 03-29-2008, 08:18 AM
Toby Toby is offline
Analyst
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 2,183
usa us north carolina
Toby has a brilliant futureToby has a brilliant futureToby has a brilliant futureToby has a brilliant futureToby has a brilliant futureToby has a brilliant futureToby has a brilliant futureToby has a brilliant futureToby has a brilliant futureToby has a brilliant futureToby has a brilliant future
Credits: 15,228
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FlackBait View Post
Whaaatever.
IM SORRY THAT THE OVERWHELMING MAJORITY OF THE VETS THAT COMEBACK FROM IRAQ DONT AGREE WITH LIBERALS. IM SORRY THIS MAKES YOU MAD. BUT THEIR OPINION HOLDS MORE WEIGHT THAN YOURS! WHY? BECAUSE THEYVE BEEN THERE! YOU KEEP WATCHING AND FORMING YOUR OPINION FROM THE US POLITICALY CHARGED MEDIA! THEY WILL BE FIGHTING AND GETTING THEIR OPINION FROM WHAT THEYVE SEEN IN IRAQ! SORRY IF THIS OFFENDS YOU! IM SORRY IF YOU VIEW THIS AS BIASSED! HOWEVER YOU DONT KNOW JACK IN COMPARISON TO MYSELF AND THE PEOPLE THAT HAVE BEEN THERE!
Reply With Quote
  #126 (permalink)  
Old 03-29-2008, 08:20 AM
Taomon's Avatar
Taomon Taomon is offline
Commentator
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: South Shore MA
Age: 40
Posts: 1,191
usa us massachusetts
Taomon is a jewel in the roughTaomon is a jewel in the roughTaomon is a jewel in the rough
Credits: 4,903
Send a message via Yahoo to Taomon
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toby View Post
IM SORRY THAT THE OVERWHELMING MAJORITY OF THE VETS THAT COMEBACK FROM IRAQ DONT AGREE WITH LIBERALS. IM SORRY THIS MAKES YOU MAD. BUT THEIR OPINION HOLDS MORE WEIGHT THAN YOURS! WHY? BECAUSE THEYVE BEEN THERE! YOU KEEP WATCHING AND FORMING YOUR OPINION FROM THE US POLITICALY CHARGED MEDIA! THEY WILL BE FIGHTING AND GETTING THEIR OPINION FROM WHAT THEYVE SEEN IN IRAQ! SORRY IF THIS OFFENDS YOU! IM SORRY IF YOU VIEW THIS AS BIASSED! HOWEVER YOU DONT KNOW JACK IN COMPARISON TO MYSELF AND THE PEOPLE THAT HAVE BEEN THERE!
Those vets views are based on one fact...Iraqis were the enemy. And anyone who shows compassion for that enemy is wrong in the eyes of those vets.

What is wrong is that vets only saw one perspective...down the barrel of a gun.

Not one veteran who has returned has spoken of rebuilding Iraq's infrastructure.
__________________
Tantum religio potuit suadere malorum
(To such heights of evil are men driven by religion)
Reply With Quote
  #127 (permalink)  
Old 03-29-2008, 09:15 AM
Toby Toby is offline
Analyst
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 2,183
usa us north carolina
Toby has a brilliant futureToby has a brilliant futureToby has a brilliant futureToby has a brilliant futureToby has a brilliant futureToby has a brilliant futureToby has a brilliant futureToby has a brilliant futureToby has a brilliant futureToby has a brilliant futureToby has a brilliant future
Credits: 15,228
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Taomon View Post
I would have us not invade and then occupy. Okay, we f'ed up and now we have to stay and continue to do damage?
HMMM. The overwhelming majority of congress BOTH DEMOCRATS AND REPUBLICANS dissagreed with you when it came time to cast there vote. As did most of the countrys in the UN and our Allies. WHAT DID SADDAM NEED TO DO TO KEEP FROM BEING INVADED? COOPERATE WITH WEAPONS INSPECTORS! ABIDE THE 1991 CAESE FIRE AGREEMENT! DID HE? NO! WAS WAR JUSTIFIED? ABSOLUTLY!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Taomon View Post
I have a better idea. We apologize to the world for allowing Bush & Cheney to lead us astray. Then we build a true coalition from the UN of countries (not previously involved in this affair - that is you Turkey, Australia, Britain and Canada) to rebuild Iraq and let them truly choose the government that they want. We then pull all US companies from Iraq...all of them. And then we make them all pay a percentage of the profits earned since 2003 for that region back into social programs in Iraq. [/color]
AND EVERY THING WILL BE NICE AN PEACEFUL IN IRAQ AND THE TERRORIST WILL PACK THERE BAGS AND GO HOME NEVER MURDERING ANOTHER IRAQI OR AMERICAN AGAIN. YES IRAQ WILL PROSPER IF WE WOULD JUST FOLLOW YOUR PLAN! WRONG!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Taomon View Post
And have any been found? No. Why? Because the WMDs that we sold to Saddam Hussein in the 1980's were used on Iranians, Kurds and US troops during the first Gulf War. The sanctions placed on Iraq and the work of the UN weapons inspectors destroyed any possibility of Iraq being armed with WMD. The Stinger missiles that we gave to the Afghanistan Freedom Fighters were not all accountable, this is true. And the Taliban & al Qaeda were allowed to flourish during George H.W. Bush's and Bill Clinton's administration.


LIKE I SAID. ALL SADDAM HAD TO DO IS COOPERATE! LET US LOOK FOR WMD'S UNRESTRICTED AND WITHOUT OPPOSITION AS PER 1991 CAESE FIRE AGREEMENT! DID HE DO THAT? HELL NO! SO HOW WERE WE TO KNOW? HE WOULDENT COOPERATE! HE MADE A MOCKERY OF THE INSPECTION PROCESS. HE DID NOT COOPERATE WITH INSPECTORS! HE BROKE 11 RULES OF THE 1991 CAESE FIR AGREEMENT! WAS WAR JUSTIFIED? YOU CAN BET YOR ASS IT WAS! AND CONGRESSS BOTH DEMOCRAT AND REPUBLICAN AGREED! EVEN AFTER THE INITAL INVASION WAS OVER!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Taomon View Post
Now, Clinton was trying, weakly, to get Osama bin Laden and al Qaeda. Treatises we have with Saudi Arabia stopped us from doing it. But George W Bush's administration were warned and they did nothing. After 9/11 they suddenly take action by carpet bombing Afghanistan (rather than apprehending Taliban & al Qaeda operatives and sparing the lives of countless civilian Afghans). They also ensured that our civil liberties at home were taken away with the Patriot act, domestic spying and who knows what other programs.
NAME ONE UNIT, PLANE, OR BRANCH OF CERVICE THAT HAS PURPOSLY CARPET BOMBED ANY ONE! NAME ONE YOU FREAKIN LIAR! CARPET BOMBING? WHERE? WHEN? WHO? WE DONT EVEN CARPET BOMB ANY MORE! OUR BOMBS WERE GUIDED BY OUR UNITS ON THE GROUND BOTH DURING, BEFORE, AND AFTER THE INVASION OF AFGHANASTAN! BEFORE WE DROP BOMBS THEY MUST BE CLEARD AND AUTHORISED BY OUR CHAIN OF COMMAND UP TO ATLEAST A COLONEL! SO I SAY AGAIN WHO WAS CARPET BOMBING INNOCENT CIVILIANS ON PURPOSE? OR ARE YOU JUST TRYING TO DEMONIZE OUR TROOPS IN THE EFFORT TO MAKE AN POLITICAL POINT? IS IT ANY WONDER THAT THE CIVILIAN CASUALTY RATE IS THE LOWEST OF ANY CONFLICT THAT AMERICA HAS EVER BEEN INVALVED IN FOR ANY LONG PERIOUD OF TIME? AND PEOPLE LIKE YOU ARE STILL COMPLAINING! IF WE INVADED A COUNTRY AND ONLY ONE CIVILIAN DIED YOU WOULD STILL BE COMPLAINING!

ALSO IF YOU CARE ABOUT THE AFGHANIS SO MUCH THAT YOU CONDEMN ACCEDENTAL CIVILIAN CASUALTYS THEN WHY DONT YOU WANT THEM TO LIVE A LIFE OF FREEDOM. I GUESS ITS OK TO CRITISIZE AMERICA FOR COLATERAL DAMAGE BUT ITS NOT OK FOR AMERICA TO LEAVE AFGHANASTAN A PEACEFUL NATION? I GUESS ITS OK THAT WE LET THE TALIBAN RULE AFGHANASTAN BUT ITS NOT OK IF WE ACCEDENTLY KILL CIVILIANS IN THE EFFORT TO DESTROY AN ENEMY WHOS OBJECTIVE IS TO HIDE BEHIND THEM? WOW YOUVE GOT YOUR PRIORITYS BACKWARDS!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Taomon View Post
And that was taken right after Saddam's execution. What is the situation now? If the area is not destabilized, then why can we not leave?
BECAUSE THE IRAQI ARMY ISNT STRONG ENOUGH TO DEFEND IRAQ ON ITS OWN SHOULD IRAQ TURN IN TO PRE 2008 IRAQ. YOU CANT JUST PULL EVERYONE OUT AT ONCE. THEY MUST BE REPLACED BY IRAQI UNITS. THEY MUST PROVIDE OVERWATCH WHEN THEY ARE REPLAVED BY THE IRAQI UNITS, AND THEY MUST LEAVE ONLY WHEN IRAQ CAN DEFEND ITSELF! BUT YOU ONCE AGAIN WOULD RATHER THE MUJAHADIEN AND ALQUIEDA TAKE OVER THAN HAVE THE IRAQI GOVEERMENT TAKE CARE OF ITSELF!

Name one war that America fought based on lies...oh yeah, that would be all of them.
Reply With Quote
  #128 (permalink)  
Old 03-29-2008, 09:15 AM
Toby Toby is offline
Analyst
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 2,183
usa us north carolina
Toby has a brilliant futureToby has a brilliant futureToby has a brilliant futureToby has a brilliant futureToby has a brilliant futureToby has a brilliant futureToby has a brilliant futureToby has a brilliant futureToby has a brilliant futureToby has a brilliant futureToby has a brilliant future
Credits: 15,228
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Taomon View Post
How Dare I? Because our troops are not angels. They have a duty...to kill. The mercenary armies that we hired are killing civilians, which angers the populace. They retaliate, and they do not see one army or another...they are all American to them...and those mercenary armies are American people - armed and dangerous.


ARE YOU CALLING OUR TROOPS MURDERS? ARE YOU ACCUSING OUR TROOPS OF MURDERING HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF INNOCENT IRAQIS? HAVE YOU BEEN TO IRAQ? HAVE YOU WORKED WITH THE TROOPS? HAVE YOU SEEN THE ANBAR PROVENCE LATLEY!? ANBAR PROVENCE MAKES UP 1/3RD OF IRAQ! AND THEY COMPLEATLY KICKED OUT THE ENEMY WITH THE HELP OF OUR TROOPS! WHY? BECAUSE THEY WERE TIRED OF BEING MURDERED BY THE MUJ AND ALQUIEDA! I WANDER WHY THEY CHOSE US OVER THEM? BECAUSE WE ARENT MURDERING THEM! WOW! WHAT A CONCEPT! FIND ANOTHER ARGUEMENT! YOUVE LOST THIS ONE!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Taomon View Post
Look at the pictures from Gitmo & Abu Ghraib, how dare you yell at me about how innocent our troops are when we see evidence of them committing atrocities.
HOW MANY TROOPS YOU SAY? GIVE ME THE NUMBER OF TROOPS INVALVED AT ABU GRAIB. IM SURE YOU WILL FIND THAT THEY ARE IN THE LOWER DOUBLE DIGITS IF NOT SINGLE! AND YOU WANT TO MAKE A GENERALISATION OF ALL OF OUR TROOPS FOR THE ACTIONS OF A FEW FOR SOMETHING THAT HAPPENED BACK IN 2003! YOU HAVE NO ARGUEMENT HERE! NONE WHAT SO EVER!

GITMO? YOU MEAN THE SAME TROOPS THAT ARE HAVING COCKTAILS "A COMBINATION OF URINE, CRAP, BLOOD, AND SEMEN" THROWNE AT THEM AS THEY PASS BY IN THE PRISON? THE SAME TROOPS THAT HAVE HAS ASSAULT AFTER ASSAULT ON THEIR LIVES AT GITMO ON A DAILY BASES? AND OF COURSE YOUR TALKING ABOUT THE PRISIONERS THAT HAVE A RIGHT TO A LAWYER, 5 BRODCAST PRAYERS A DAY, ARROWS IN THERE CELLS POINTING TO MECCA, SKULL CAPS, 3 HALAL MEALS A DAY THAT COST MORE THAN THE FOOD WE FEED OUR TROOPS, AND ARE ACTUALLY GAINING WEIGHT! OH THOES POOR TERRORISTS!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Taomon View Post
Fallujah was an act of revenge for the deaths of three Blackwater mercenaries. An entire district was attacked, including civilians.
YES! THE FACT THAT THE TROOPS WERE ORDERED TO LEAVE FALLUJA AND IT WAS OVERRAN BY TERRORISTS HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH IT! GET REAL!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Taomon View Post
There is film footage of an IED exploding and an American battalion opening fire on a children's soccer game (as they fired in every possible direction).
LET ME SEE IT!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Taomon View Post
There is countless footage of door-to-door raids by our service men & women as they violate the culture and rights of the Iraqi civilian population.
LOL! YOU WANT TO SEE VIOATIONS OF CULTERUAL RIGHTS I SUGGEST YOU LET THE ENEMY HAVE THE IRAQI PEOPLE. YOU KNOW? THE SAME ENEMY THAT DECAPITATES THE CHILDREN OF THOES THAT SUPPORT THE IRAQI DEMOCRACY, DETONATED BOMBS IN CROWDED MARKET PLACES, HIDES BEHIND CIVILIANS AT MOSQUES, SCHOOLS, AND HOSPITALS? GOSH WE MUST BE HORRIBLE IN COMPARISON TO THEM! THEY MUST DESERVE TO TORTURE THE IRAQI PEOPLE! LETS GET THOES EVIL AMERICANS OUT NOW!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Taomon View Post
How much do we not see? How dare YOU attack ME when we both know that war is hell and there are always civilian casualties...especially when a country (the US) invades and occupies another country. But these are people we are talking about. If you truly cared about Iraqi civilians and the stability of that country, you would have us leave as well. We are the aggressors here so don't try and sugarcoat it by saying that a worse fate waits for Iraqis if we leave when we are the big bad wolf.
I WOULD LOVE TO PUT YOU ON A PLANE TO WORK WITH OUR TROOPS FOR ABOUT 8 MONTHS! I WANT TO SEE YOUR FACE WHEN YOU SEE THE ENEMIE TORTURE CHAMBERS OF FALLUJA, OR THE DECAPITATED CHILDREN OF IRAQI CONGRESSMEN. I WANT YOU TO WATCH THE ENEMY BOMBS BLOW UP NEXT TO MOSQUES AND CROWDED MARKET PLACES. I WANT YOU TO TALK TO THE IRAQI POLICE/ARMY/AND POLITITIONS WHO'S FAMILYS ARE BEING KIDNAPED AND MURDERED! THEN I WANT YOU TO COME BACK AND CALL ME A MURDER TO MY FACE!

NOW IF YOU TRULY CARE ABOUT THE IRAQIS WHY LEAVE THEM TO ISLAMIC EXTREAMISTS? ANSWER THAT QUESTION!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Taomon View Post
Based on lies that the Bush Administration cherry-picked from historical reports. Saddam was more of a threat to our security when he was in our pocket during the Reagan years.
YOUR FORGETTING ABOUT THE CLINTON ADMINISTRATION BACK IN THE EARLY TO LATE 1990'S! DO YOU WANT ME TO POST THE VIDEO AGAIN? THAT WAS THE SAME INFORMATION TRANSFERED OVER TO THE BUSH ADMINISTRATION! AND THATS THE SAME INFORMATION THAT CONGRESS USED TO CAST THERE VOTE!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Taomon View Post
[color="blue"]So you don't blame Bush for lying to Congress or the UN...you blame Congress for believing the lies that Bush put together?
YES THE LIES THAT BUSH PUT TOGATHER?

Regime change in Iraq has been official US policy since 1998. The Iraq Liberation Act of 1998, signed into law by President Clinton, states:

"It should be the policy of the United States to support efforts to remove the regime headed by Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq and to promote the emergence of a democratic government to replace that regime."

Iraq Liberation Act of 1998
105th Congress, 2nd Session
September 29, 1998


http://freedomagenda.com/iraq/wmd_qu...tml#Lof9huGeMd

http://globalsecurity.org/wmd/librar...980929-in2.htm

.................................................. ............................

"The hard fact is that so long as Saddam remains in power, he threatens the well-being of his people, the peace of his region, the security of the world.

The best way to end that threat once and for all is with a new Iraqi government -- a government ready to live in peace with its neighbors, a government that respects the rights of its people."

President Clinton
Oval Office Address to the American People
December 16, 1998

http://freedomagenda.com/iraq/wmd_qu...tml#kO7eVCiIta

http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/stori...s/clinton.html
.................................................. ...........
"People can quarrel with whether we should have more troops in Afghanistan or internationalize Iraq or whatever, but it is incontestable that on the day I left office, there were unaccounted for stocks of biological and chemical weapons."

Former President Clinton
During an interview on CNN's "Larry King Live"
July 22, 2003


http://freedomagenda.com/iraq/wmd_qu...tml#wR6nIpoLli

http://www.cnn.com/2003/ALLPOLITICS/...ton.iraq.sotu/
.................................................. ...............................

"Imagine the consequences if Saddam fails to comply and we fail to act. Saddam will be emboldened, believing the international community has lost its will. He will rebuild his arsenal of weapons of mass destruction. And some day, some way, I am certain, he will use that arsenal again, as he has ten times since 1983."

Sandy Berger, President Clinton's National Security Advisor
Town Hall Meeting on Iraq at Ohio State University
February 18, 1998


http://freedomagenda.com/iraq/wmd_qu...tml#voY0lOeonG

http://www.fas.org/news/iraq/1998/02...22006_tpo.html
.................................................. ...................................
The Guardian
February 6, 1999

Saddam link to Bin Laden

By Julian Borger

Saddam Hussein's regime has opened talks with Osama bin Laden, bringing closer the threat of a terrorist attack using chemical, biological or nuclear weapons, according to US intelligence sources and Iraqi opposition officials.

The key meeting took place in the Afghan mountains near Kandahar in late December. The Iraqi delegation was led by Farouk Hijazi, Baghdad's ambassador in Turkey and one of Saddam's most powerful secret policemen, who is thought to have offered Bin Laden asylum in Iraq.

News of the negotiations emerged in a week when the US attorney general, Janet Reno, warned the Senate that a terrorist attack involving weapons of mass destruction was a growing concern. "There's a threat, and it's real," Ms Reno said, adding that such weapons "are being considered for use."

http://freedomagenda.com/iraq/wmd_qu...tml#tO6tWImvU6

http://www.guardian.co.uk/internatio...314700,00.html
.................................................. .................................

Last edited by Toby; 03-29-2008 at 09:22 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #129 (permalink)  
Old 03-29-2008, 09:28 AM
Toby Toby is offline
Analyst
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 2,183
usa us north carolina
Toby has a brilliant futureToby has a brilliant futureToby has a brilliant futureToby has a brilliant futureToby has a brilliant futureToby has a brilliant futureToby has a brilliant futureToby has a brilliant futureToby has a brilliant futureToby has a brilliant futureToby has a brilliant future
Credits: 15,228
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Taomon View Post
Those vets views are based on one fact...Iraqis were the enemy. And anyone who shows compassion for that enemy is wrong in the eyes of those vets.

What is wrong is that vets only saw one perspective...down the barrel of a gun.

Not one veteran who has returned has spoken of rebuilding Iraq's infrastructure.
IM A VET! AND IM APEAKING OF THEIR IMPROVED INFASTRUCTER! BUT I MUST NOT COUNT BECAUSE ITS DETRAMENTAL TO YOUR ARGUEMENT RIGHT?

NOTE: THIS INFORMATION WAS FROM SEPT 2007. IRAQ IS EVEN BETTER NOW!

7)Myth: Iraq’s economy and infrastructure is getting worse

Despite terrorist attacks and sabotage Iraq’s economy has grown much faster than post war Germany and Japan.

1) The Iraqi unemployment rate is at 25-40%. That’s down from 50-60% back in 2003.
2) The electricity production level is 15% above pre war levels and the goal set by the US for average electricity generated has been reached years ago.
3) 8,997,000 more people have phone service than before the war.
4) Before the war there were no commercial TV stations, no commercial radio stations, and no independent news papers or magazines. Now there are 54 commercial TV stations 114 commercial radio stations and, 268 independent newspapers and magazines.
5) There are 5.7% more children in elementary school since pre war levels and there is an 27% increase of children in middle/high schools since before the war.
6) People with access to potable water before the war was 12.9 million but now 9.7 million with an 4.2 million increase since the war started. 6.2 million people had sewage before the war as opposed to the 5.6 million that have it now. However the CPA’s goal was 2.5 million.
7) Iraq has managed to make 21 billion dollars in Oil revenues despite the insurgent sabotages and the number will only rise each year.
Iraq’s GDP has more than doubled its growth since prewar levels making Iraq the fastest growing economy in the world.





Iraq Electricity Production at All-time High

Iraq Electricity Production at Alltime High
Brookings institute Iraq Study
http://www3.brookings.edu/fp/saban/iraq/index.pdf
Washington Institute
http://www.washingtoninstitute.org/p...icyFocus50.pdf
CIA Iraq
https://www.cia.gov/library/publicat...k/geos/iz.html

Last edited by Toby; 03-29-2008 at 09:29 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #130 (permalink)  
Old 03-29-2008, 10:48 AM
<