Political Forum
     

Go Back   Political Forum > General Political Chat > Current Events


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #201 (permalink)  
Old 03-30-2008, 02:46 PM
C-D-P C-D-P is offline
Analyst
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,704
usa
C-D-P has much to be proud ofC-D-P has much to be proud ofC-D-P has much to be proud ofC-D-P has much to be proud ofC-D-P has much to be proud ofC-D-P has much to be proud ofC-D-P has much to be proud ofC-D-P has much to be proud ofC-D-P has much to be proud of
Credits: 12,683
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tuatara View Post
What makes you think it was his call to make. If it were the invasion would have never happened. He is voicing his opinion that the invasion was not worth the lives (both american and Iraqi) and the money and the stability of the region. Many of us agree with that statement.
And many that do not. I do however find it odd that you fail to capitalize the A in American, but do not fail to do so with Iraqi. Or is that just because hitting shift twice was too hard?
__________________
Someone hijacked my sig again.

Last edited by C-D-P; 03-30-2008 at 02:46 PM.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Red Cross - Donate Today    Save the Rainforest
  #202 (permalink)  
Old 03-30-2008, 02:58 PM
Tuatara's Avatar
Tuatara Tuatara is offline
Commentator
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Victoria BC
Posts: 1,107
micronesia au tasmania
Tuatara is a name known to allTuatara is a name known to allTuatara is a name known to allTuatara is a name known to allTuatara is a name known to allTuatara is a name known to all
Credits: 5,462
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by C-D-P View Post
And many that do not. I do however find it odd that you fail to capitalize the A in American, but do not fail to do so with Iraqi. Or is that just because hitting shift twice was too hard?
Is this better?

American
__________________
America's Enemies Are Not Mine

All wars represent a failure of diplomacy

“I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in one fewer god than you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods, you will understand why I dismiss yours.” - Stephen Roberts.
Reply With Quote
  #203 (permalink)  
Old 03-30-2008, 03:06 PM
C-D-P C-D-P is offline
Analyst
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,704
usa
C-D-P has much to be proud ofC-D-P has much to be proud ofC-D-P has much to be proud ofC-D-P has much to be proud ofC-D-P has much to be proud ofC-D-P has much to be proud ofC-D-P has much to be proud ofC-D-P has much to be proud ofC-D-P has much to be proud of
Credits: 12,683
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tuatara View Post
Is this better?

American
Nice educated well thought out post. Exactly what I have come to expect. Thanks.
__________________
Someone hijacked my sig again.

Last edited by C-D-P; 03-30-2008 at 03:07 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #204 (permalink)  
Old 03-30-2008, 03:21 PM
AuGiRl87 AuGiRl87 is offline
Observer
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Auburn, Al
Posts: 4
usa us texas
AuGiRl87 is an unknown quantity at this point
Send a message via AIM to AuGiRl87
Default

There was a middle school in Wisconsin I believe that wouldnt let these guys come because it was "too political"
Reply With Quote
  #205 (permalink)  
Old 03-30-2008, 08:05 PM
BigRed BigRed is offline
Analyst
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,937
BigRed is a splendid one to beholdBigRed is a splendid one to beholdBigRed is a splendid one to beholdBigRed is a splendid one to beholdBigRed is a splendid one to beholdBigRed is a splendid one to beholdBigRed is a splendid one to beholdBigRed is a splendid one to behold
Credits: 18,883
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by C-D-P View Post
I read a few of them, and they said the same thing ever other link you posted said, the same things that were discredited in earlier discussions.
I wasn't in any earlier discussion. I don't know of any "earlier discussion". You always say that CDP. That whatever I provide was debunked sometime earlier. You never actually take the time yourself to debunk it. Why? Obviously because you can't.

Quote:
Originally Posted by C-D-P View Post
Ok, very well. You feel free to THINK that way then.
You need to read the article that you provided. I'm not interpreting it a certain way or paraphrasing. That is what the guy said.

Quote:
Originally Posted by C-D-P View Post
They had their time. And they let themselves get pushed around, and rewrote things and rewrote them again until they were allowed to go in under stringent conditions. It is no wonder they did not find anything.
The Iraqi government sent a letter to the UN and said "unconditional inspections".
Reply With Quote
  #206 (permalink)  
Old 03-31-2008, 01:49 AM
bugalugs bugalugs is offline
Commentator
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,128
australia au queensland
bugalugs is a splendid one to beholdbugalugs is a splendid one to beholdbugalugs is a splendid one to beholdbugalugs is a splendid one to beholdbugalugs is a splendid one to beholdbugalugs is a splendid one to beholdbugalugs is a splendid one to behold
Credits: 8,308
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by C-D-P View Post
How about you stop attempting to insult me.

But you obviously completely ignored what I said earlier.

I do not believe our Gov lied. Were they wrong in some things? Yes, but faulty intel does not mean a lie.
I'm not attempting to insult you. But it is relevant to point out the fact that many of the statements you have made on these boards have been proved to be completely untrue.

And now you have done it again - made a statement that was a complete lie.

When asked by Tuatara:
All the lying quotes have been presented but not one of you has discussed any of those in detail.

You replied:
You have not provided any reliable reference to back this claim up.


When only a few posts earlier I had posted a list of lies told by the various governments responsible for the illegal invasion of Iraq - all of the quotes fully referenced


Quote:
Originally Posted by Bugalugs
How about these lies:

"We know he's been absolutely devoted to trying to acquire nuclear weapons, and we believe he has, in fact, reconstituted nuclear weapons."
VP Dick Cheney – “Meet the Press” 3/16/2003

“The facts and Iraq's behaviour show that Saddam Hussein and his regime are concealing their efforts to produce more weapons of mass destruction... Ladies and gentlemen, these are not assertions. These are facts corroborated by many sources, some of them sources of the intelligence services of other countries” — US Secretary of State Colin Powell's February 5 presentation at the UN.

"We gave him a chance to allow the inspectors in, and he wouldn't let them in." Bush Press Conference 7/14/2003

"The British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa." State of the Union Address – 1/28/2003

"Our intelligence sources tell us that he (Saddam) has attempted to purchase high-strength aluminum tubes suitable for nuclear weapons production." State of the Union Address – 1/28/2003

"Evidence from intelligence sources, secret communications and statements by people now in custody reveal that Saddam Hussein aids and protects terrorists, including members of Al Qaida." State of the Union Address – 1/28/2003

“The Australian Government knows that Iraq still has chemical and biological weapons and that Iraq wants to develop nuclear weapons.” John Howard, Speech to Parliament before the war in Iraq, 4 February 2003

“[Saddam Hussein's] weapons of mass destruction program is active, detailed and growing. The policy of containment is not working. The weapons of mass destruction program is not shut down; it is up and running now” — Tony Blair in the British parliamentary debate on Iraq, September 24.

“We know for a fact there are weapons there” — White House mouthpiece Ari Fleischer, January 9.

How can you possibly argue that all of these statements are not lies?

How on earth can you believe that:
“The facts and Iraq's behaviour show that Saddam Hussein and his regime are concealing their efforts to produce more weapons of mass destruction... Ladies and gentlemen, these are not assertions. These are facts "
is not a complete and outright lie?
Reply With Quote
  #207 (permalink)  
Old 03-31-2008, 02:42 AM
DuH2's Avatar
DuH2 DuH2 is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 10,633
usa
DuH2 has a reputation beyond reputeDuH2 has a reputation beyond reputeDuH2 has a reputation beyond reputeDuH2 has a reputation beyond reputeDuH2 has a reputation beyond reputeDuH2 has a reputation beyond reputeDuH2 has a reputation beyond reputeDuH2 has a reputation beyond reputeDuH2 has a reputation beyond reputeDuH2 has a reputation beyond reputeDuH2 has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 48,256
Default

No...because Iraq under Saddam did play games to hide what they where doing. Saddam himself admitted to that.
__________________
McCain/Palin 2008
"We make war that we may live in peace"
"Peace is the highest aspiration of the American People. We will negotiate for it, sacrifice for it, we will never surrender for it, now or ever."
"Keep that faith,keep your courage,stick together, stay strong,do not yield,do not flinch,stand up,we're Americans,we'll never surrender they will"
http://members.cox.net/neddy/bobhope_kerfuffles.wmv
http://youtube.com/watch?v=RnfflRNpwKA
http://youtube.com/watch?v=j-QYIP7o2-A

Last edited by DuH2; 03-31-2008 at 02:43 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #208 (permalink)  
Old 03-31-2008, 03:40 AM
C-D-P C-D-P is offline
Analyst
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,704
usa
C-D-P has much to be proud ofC-D-P has much to be proud ofC-D-P has much to be proud ofC-D-P has much to be proud ofC-D-P has much to be proud ofC-D-P has much to be proud ofC-D-P has much to be proud ofC-D-P has much to be proud ofC-D-P has much to be proud of
Credits: 12,683
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bugalugs View Post
I'm not attempting to insult you. But it is relevant to point out the fact that many of the statements you have made on these boards have been proved to be completely untrue.

And now you have done it again - made a statement that was a complete lie.

When asked by Tuatara:
All the lying quotes have been presented but not one of you has discussed any of those in detail.

You replied:
You have not provided any reliable reference to back this claim up.


When only a few posts earlier I had posted a list of lies told by the various governments responsible for the illegal invasion of Iraq - all of the quotes fully referenced





How can you possibly argue that all of these statements are not lies?

How on earth can you believe that:
“The facts and Iraq's behaviour show that Saddam Hussein and his regime are concealing their efforts to produce more weapons of mass destruction... Ladies and gentlemen, these are not assertions. These are facts "
is not a complete and outright lie?
You posted a list of nothings. Every one of those statments was easily explained away by bad intel. Bad intel does not mean a lie.

Now you have just circled back around to where we started. Do you have anything new of substance to add?
__________________
Someone hijacked my sig again.
Reply With Quote
  #209 (permalink)  
Old 03-31-2008, 04:58 AM
bugalugs bugalugs is offline
Commentator
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,128
australia au queensland
bugalugs is a splendid one to beholdbugalugs is a splendid one to beholdbugalugs is a splendid one to beholdbugalugs is a splendid one to beholdbugalugs is a splendid one to beholdbugalugs is a splendid one to beholdbugalugs is a splendid one to behold
Credits: 8,308
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by C-D-P View Post
You posted a list of nothings. Every one of those statments was easily explained away by bad intel. Bad intel does not mean a lie.
I see - so make a statement that is completely and utterly false is not in your opinion a lie. A claim of ignorance is, in your opinion, is a perfectly valid excuse for not telling the truth.

Saying, "Ladies and gentlemen, these are not assertions. These are facts" when there are not facts at all, but assertions based on dubious intelligence is not, in your opinion, actually a lie.


You say it can all be blamed on "bad intel" can it? That is convenient, isn't it.

Tell me, what about the intelligence such as the Defense Intelligence Agency study in September 2002 which indicated there was "no reliable information on whether Iraq is producing and stockpiling chemical weapons" and a "substantial amount of Iraq's chemical warfare agents...were destroyed between 1991 and 1998."
http://www.fas.org/irp/news/2003/06/dod060703.html

Or the October 2002 assessment by the State Department's Intelligence and Research Department that stated "...The activities we have detected do not, however, add up to a compelling case that Iraq is currently pursuing what INR would consider to be an integrated and comprehensive approach to acquire nuclear weapons. Iraq may be doing so, but INR considers the available evidence inadequate to support such a judgment. "
http://ftp.fas.org/irp/cia/product/iraq-wmd.html

Or that in February 2003, the IAEA reported that there was “no evidence of ongoing nuclear or nuclear-related activities” and “they had not found any weapons of mass destruction.
http://www.iaea.org/NewsCenter/State...2003n005.shtml


Is this the type of "intel" that statements such as:

“The facts and Iraq's behaviour show that Saddam Hussein and his regime are concealing their efforts to produce more weapons of mass destruction... Ladies and gentlemen, these are not assertions. These are facts "?

are based on?

Are you sure that that isn't what a reasonable person might actually call "a lie"?
Reply With Quote
  #210 (permalink)  
Old 03-31-2008, 05:38 AM
Tuatara's Avatar
Tuatara Tuatara is offline
Commentator
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Victoria BC
Posts: 1,107
micronesia au tasmania
Tuatara is a name known to allTuatara is a name known to allTuatara is a name known to allTuatara is a name known to allTuatara is a name known to allTuatara is a name known to all
Credits: 5,462
Default

C-D-P can not admit they were lies. He can not admit he was fooled. He can not admit that he and his military buddies are risking their lives for a pack of lies. It would be devastating to him to know that anyone who has died in Iraq, especially someone close, died in vain and died defending a pack of lies. I can understand why he has his heels dug in. They have to be doing the right thing because if he second guesses it, he cannot do his job. How can anyone follow orders when they believe their mission was based on lies. He doesn't want to be labeled traitor, unpatriotic, anti-American, or far worse a liberal.
__________________
America's Enemies Are Not Mine

All wars represent a failure of diplomacy

“I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in one fewer god than you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods, you will understand why I dismiss yours.” - Stephen Roberts.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Are you anti-Obama, anti-Hillary, or anti-Democrat? bostonjc Political Opinions & Beliefs 51 03-20-2008 04:20 PM
Tinnitus And The Anti-war Crowd DiscerningBlog Political Blogs 1 03-08-2008 05:43 PM
The very real possibility that a 'Stupid Virus' may exist... Didereaux Political Opinions & Beliefs 0 10-05-2007 06:04 PM
Hmm, this should be a good crowd to ask... LoSconosciuto Off-Topic Chat 13 03-26-2006 08:44 AM
I guess I misjudged the MTV crowd.... jimholcomb Elections & Campaigns 26 08-31-2004 06:30 PM

Sponsored Links

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:46 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0
Template-Modifikationen durch TMS
vBCredits v1.3 ©2007 by Darkwaltz4
Advertisement System V2.1 By   Branden