You say illegal, I say it was improvising. Things change. At one point the Constitution said black men had no rights.

This has been explained ad nauseum.

The funny thing is, you have not proved a dammed thing.

Well good, cause that is exactly why we went to Iraq.

See above.

__________________
Someone hijacked my sig again.

So your calling me a murderer? The US military does not target the innocent! Never has never will! YOU CAN NOT BLAME AMERICA FOR THE ACTIONS OF THOES WHO WANT TO MURDER THE INNOCENT! AMERICA DOES NOT MAKE THEM KILL THE INNOCENT! THEY DO IT OF THEIR OWN FREE WILL! get that crap out of here! If someone invaded Canada I wouldent target the Canadians!

Ive seen it with my own eyes! What have you got? But since you want an example here is a letter from the mayor of tell afar!>>
http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/To_the...valry_Regiment

"Their savagery reached such a level that they stuffed the corpses of children with explosives and tossed them into the streets in order to kill grieving parents attempting to retrieve the bodies of their young."

You refusal to acknowlege the truth of how brutal the enemy is can only be atributed to your lack of first hand knowlege and political bias!

They are killed for supporting the Iraqi Democracy. And there are alot of people who support the Iraqi democracy! But thats how terror works! Murder the innocent in order to draw support away from thoes who support america or an iraq democracy! YOU WOULD LET THEM GET AWAT WITH THIS!



YOUR TRYING TO JUSTIFY THEIR ACTIONS BECAUSE THEY DONT STAND A CHANCE AGAINST AMERICA UNLESS THEY HIDE BEHIND THE INNOCENT? WHOS SIDE ARE YOU ON? WOW WHAT A REDICULOUS ARGUMENT!!!!!!

BECAUSE THE ENEMY BROUGHT THE FIGHT TO THE CIVILIAN POPULATION! THEY DONT NEED TO FIRE AT US FROM MOSQUES, HOSPITALS, SCHOOLS, AND HOMES OF THE INNOCENT! THATS WHY THE IRAQIS ARE REJECTING THEM! THATS WHY THEY SIDE WITH US AS APOSED TO ALQUIEDA!

So your saying that its our fault that the enemy makes the direct descision to murder the innocent? WE ARE NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR THE ACTIONS OF OTHERS! WE HAVE DONE NOTHING THAT WOULD PHYSICALLY MAKE THE ENEMY TARGET THE INNOCENT!

Murdering the Jews were done because an religious ideology. When the enemy killes the innocent it is done because of an religious ideology! Our troops do not fight for an religious ideology! ASK THEM!


My anger is pointing at thoes who make slanderous accusations at our military yet have never been to Iraq!

Where?

Improvising? If they wanted to do that, amend the Constitution.

If I recall from a previous debate, I'm assuming these documents you are referring are the ones we picked up from Iraq...not sure what exactly they'll prove for your case.

So you say over and over again without doing any of the work, while I break my back time in and time out to show this and show that and it means nothing apparently because I haven't provided anything.

I wish we did. But we didn't. Nobody in the world poses a threat to our national security now, in the past or probably anytime in the future. Nobody posed a threat to us (a country that is) before or after 9/11. Iraq, a third world country pretty much, certainly didn't. I think that kind of knocks down America to think that some little (*)(*)(*)(*)hole country like Iraq posed any semblance of a threat to the mighty America.

Iraq certainly wasn't infringing on my rights either. So nope, war not necessary.

If I may ask you a question CDP, did Iraq pose an imminent threat to the United States in your opinion?

I'm not even going to watch the video. I know the Democrats suck on the Iraq War. The Democrats are just as bad as the Republicans and have probably been worse for longer.

But they believed Iraq was a direct threrat! And by UN Law we are justified in defending ourselves no matter what the Un thinks or believes. Would War had been neccesary if saddam cooperated with us? Probaly not! But he did not cooperate! He made a mochary of the inspections! War is and was justified the second that Saddam broke 11 terms of the 1991 case fire agreement and failed to let us search unapposed for WMD's as per 1991 case fire agreement!

I cant get the site to come up. I will post it later.

That takes time. We did not have time on our side. We lost a lot of intel because we sat on the border for so long.

You should start reading the other threads you participate in. From some of the documents that have already been released. We have been able to establish a strong connection between Saddam and various terrorist organizations.

Brother, if you think a google search and a poor explination of your findings is back breaking work, stand by, because the real world will drop a hammer on ya.

Now that is just an ignorant comment. You haven't the foggiest clue. But that is good. The people are supposed to feel safe.

Funny.

__________________
Someone hijacked my sig again.

I am pretty sure I have already answered this question.

If I did not think so, then I would not be using that as part of my argument on how it was not illegal.

__________________
Someone hijacked my sig again.

So until that amending process takes effect, every single conflict since WW2 has been unconstitutional.

I'm well aware of his ties. But none have proven to have attacked the United States nor fund Al Queda or anything of the sort. If it comes out as such, then we'll talk.

Haha. It was an expression. I find it enjoyable as a matter of fact because it allows me to pick up both sides of the coin so to speak.

Please do entertain me on why it is ignorant and why I haven't the "foggiest clue".


But true.