Political Forum
     

Go Back   Political Forum > General Political Chat > Current Events


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21 (permalink)  
Old 08-21-2008, 09:20 AM
TheHat's Avatar
TheHat TheHat is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 4,154
usa
TheHat has a brilliant futureTheHat has a brilliant futureTheHat has a brilliant futureTheHat has a brilliant futureTheHat has a brilliant futureTheHat has a brilliant futureTheHat has a brilliant futureTheHat has a brilliant futureTheHat has a brilliant futureTheHat has a brilliant futureTheHat has a brilliant future
Credits: 3,654
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Inferno View Post
It seems to me that Saddam was their leader and we still had no business being there. If Russia just one day decides they don't like some leader and take over that country we are going to say you can't do that you are bad. Don't do as we do, do as we say. We are just full of (*)(*)(*)(*) with this administration.
Again, Liberal hysteria.

We have been at war with Iraq since 1991. Just humor just an inch please. Put things into historical perspectives please, just once.
__________________
If I had the option of voting 2000 and 2004 over again, I would still vote Bush.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Red Cross - Donate Today    Save the Rainforest
  #22 (permalink)  
Old 08-21-2008, 09:51 AM
The Jovial One's Avatar
The Jovial One The Jovial One is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Age: 53
Posts: 6,296
The Jovial One has a reputation beyond reputeThe Jovial One has a reputation beyond reputeThe Jovial One has a reputation beyond reputeThe Jovial One has a reputation beyond reputeThe Jovial One has a reputation beyond reputeThe Jovial One has a reputation beyond reputeThe Jovial One has a reputation beyond reputeThe Jovial One has a reputation beyond reputeThe Jovial One has a reputation beyond reputeThe Jovial One has a reputation beyond reputeThe Jovial One has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 153,707
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheHat View Post
Again, Liberal hysteria.

We have been at war with Iraq since 1991. Just humor just an inch please. Put things into historical perspectives please, just once.
Oceania has always been at war with Eastasia. Is that what you're saying?
__________________
"If there is anyone out there who still doubts that America is a place where all things are possible, who still wonders if the dream of our founders is alive in our time, who still questions the power of our democracy, tonight is your answer."
--President-elect Barack Obama
November 5, 2008

Last edited by The Jovial One; 08-21-2008 at 09:51 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #23 (permalink)  
Old 08-21-2008, 10:33 AM
Rebellion's Avatar
Rebellion Rebellion is offline
Site Moderator
Guru
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Boston
Posts: 14,615
usa
Rebellion has a reputation beyond reputeRebellion has a reputation beyond reputeRebellion has a reputation beyond reputeRebellion has a reputation beyond reputeRebellion has a reputation beyond reputeRebellion has a reputation beyond reputeRebellion has a reputation beyond reputeRebellion has a reputation beyond reputeRebellion has a reputation beyond reputeRebellion has a reputation beyond reputeRebellion has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 142,705
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Jovial One View Post
Same sort of plan others have posited before, which Bush (and all his little neocon pals) called "surrender."
Surrender referred to those on the left calling for an immediate pull out. The left is unhappy that they no longer have something to whine about.
__________________
All you need to know about the energy crisis:
ANWR Exploration Republicans: 91% Supported. Democrats: 86% Opposed.
Coal-to-liquid R's: 90% YES. D's: 78% NO.
Oil Shale Exploration R's: 90% YES. D's: 86% NO.
Outer Continental Shelf Exploration R's: 81% YES. D's: 83% NO.
Increased Refinery Capacity R's: 97% YES. D's: 96% NO

SUMMARY: 91% of House Republicans have historically voted to increase the production of America’s own oil and gas. 86% of House Democrats have historically voted against.
Reply With Quote
  #24 (permalink)  
Old 08-21-2008, 10:46 AM
The Jovial One's Avatar
The Jovial One The Jovial One is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Age: 53
Posts: 6,296
The Jovial One has a reputation beyond reputeThe Jovial One has a reputation beyond reputeThe Jovial One has a reputation beyond reputeThe Jovial One has a reputation beyond reputeThe Jovial One has a reputation beyond reputeThe Jovial One has a reputation beyond reputeThe Jovial One has a reputation beyond reputeThe Jovial One has a reputation beyond reputeThe Jovial One has a reputation beyond reputeThe Jovial One has a reputation beyond reputeThe Jovial One has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 153,707
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rebellion View Post
Surrender referred to those on the left calling for an immediate pull out. The left is unhappy that they no longer have something to whine about.
Obama isn't CALLING for an immediate pullout.

Please deal in facts from now on.

Thank you.
__________________
"If there is anyone out there who still doubts that America is a place where all things are possible, who still wonders if the dream of our founders is alive in our time, who still questions the power of our democracy, tonight is your answer."
--President-elect Barack Obama
November 5, 2008
Reply With Quote
  #25 (permalink)  
Old 08-21-2008, 11:02 AM
Rebellion's Avatar
Rebellion Rebellion is offline
Site Moderator
Guru
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Boston
Posts: 14,615
usa
Rebellion has a reputation beyond reputeRebellion has a reputation beyond reputeRebellion has a reputation beyond reputeRebellion has a reputation beyond reputeRebellion has a reputation beyond reputeRebellion has a reputation beyond reputeRebellion has a reputation beyond reputeRebellion has a reputation beyond reputeRebellion has a reputation beyond reputeRebellion has a reputation beyond reputeRebellion has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 142,705
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Jovial One View Post
Obama isn't CALLING for an immediate pullout.

Please deal in facts from now on.

Thank you.
No but many on the left did. That is a fact. You're welcome. Obama only called for withdrawal from Iraq in 2007 when speaking in 2006. If he had followed his disasterous plan and those on the left who wanted immediate pullout things wouldn't be as positive as they are today. http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/11/...raq/index.html

Now he's calling for a 16 month pullout. Given this disaster of a declaration I say he has no credibility on the issue.

Quote:
Obama called last year for a limited pullout of American troops from Iraq, but said it is now necessary for that withdrawal to begin in 2007.
"I refuse to accept the possibility that I will have to come back a year from now and say the same thing," he said.

"While some have proposed escalating this war by adding thousands of more troops, there is little reason to believe that this will achieve [victory]," Obama said.

"It's not clear that these troop levels are sustainable for a significant period of time, and according to our commanders on the ground, adding American forces will only relieve the Iraqis from doing more on their own."
Oops. Now for the correct response and prediction

Quote:
On Sunday, McCain said on ABC's "This Week" that the current U.S. forces in Iraq are are "fighting and dying for a failed policy" and said an increase in force levels are necessary to stabilize the security situation in the country.
__________________
All you need to know about the energy crisis:
ANWR Exploration Republicans: 91% Supported. Democrats: 86% Opposed.
Coal-to-liquid R's: 90% YES. D's: 78% NO.
Oil Shale Exploration R's: 90% YES. D's: 86% NO.
Outer Continental Shelf Exploration R's: 81% YES. D's: 83% NO.
Increased Refinery Capacity R's: 97% YES. D's: 96% NO

SUMMARY: 91% of House Republicans have historically voted to increase the production of America’s own oil and gas. 86% of House Democrats have historically voted against.
Reply With Quote
  #26 (permalink)  
Old 08-21-2008, 02:17 PM
DuH2's Avatar
DuH2 DuH2 is offline
Banned
Guru
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 11,152
DuH2 has a reputation beyond reputeDuH2 has a reputation beyond reputeDuH2 has a reputation beyond reputeDuH2 has a reputation beyond reputeDuH2 has a reputation beyond reputeDuH2 has a reputation beyond reputeDuH2 has a reputation beyond reputeDuH2 has a reputation beyond reputeDuH2 has a reputation beyond reputeDuH2 has a reputation beyond reputeDuH2 has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 55,429
Default

Quote:
Iraq and the U.S. have reached preliminary agreement to withdraw American forces from Iraqi cities by next June

Thread title and op's distortion are nonsense.

Typical Far Left..
..selective editing..
..selective reading..
..distorting of facts..

Typical BS.
Reply With Quote
  #27 (permalink)  
Old 08-21-2008, 03:43 PM
lavell12's Avatar
lavell12 lavell12 is offline
Analyst
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 3,090
usa us north carolina
lavell12 has much to be proud oflavell12 has much to be proud oflavell12 has much to be proud oflavell12 has much to be proud oflavell12 has much to be proud oflavell12 has much to be proud oflavell12 has much to be proud oflavell12 has much to be proud oflavell12 has much to be proud oflavell12 has much to be proud of
Credits: 23,721
Default

This is a sign of Victory. Bush would never agree to leave Iraq without Victory. Without the surge the US would be forced to stay longer b/c we would not have had enough troops to finish the missions.

Victory!!!!!
Reply With Quote
  #28 (permalink)  
Old 08-21-2008, 03:48 PM
Anikdote's Avatar
Anikdote Anikdote is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: here
Posts: 4,349
usa us georgia
Anikdote has a reputation beyond reputeAnikdote has a reputation beyond reputeAnikdote has a reputation beyond reputeAnikdote has a reputation beyond reputeAnikdote has a reputation beyond reputeAnikdote has a reputation beyond reputeAnikdote has a reputation beyond reputeAnikdote has a reputation beyond reputeAnikdote has a reputation beyond reputeAnikdote has a reputation beyond reputeAnikdote has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 18,686
Default

As long as we leave behind a stable democracy, I don't care what word you use to describe it. Semantics are irrelevent, what matters is that we knocked down a tyrannical dictator and replaced him with a democracy, score one for the good guys.
__________________

Love Freedom?
Reply With Quote
  #29 (permalink)  
Old 08-21-2008, 03:50 PM
Sparky Farkas's Avatar
Sparky Farkas Sparky Farkas is offline
Commentator
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,418
Sparky Farkas has a reputation beyond reputeSparky Farkas has a reputation beyond reputeSparky Farkas has a reputation beyond reputeSparky Farkas has a reputation beyond reputeSparky Farkas has a reputation beyond reputeSparky Farkas has a reputation beyond reputeSparky Farkas has a reputation beyond reputeSparky Farkas has a reputation beyond reputeSparky Farkas has a reputation beyond reputeSparky Farkas has a reputation beyond reputeSparky Farkas has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 8,914
Default

What is it exactly that America is surrendering in Iraq? In fact, how can we surrender when President Codpiece declared "Mission Accomplished" 4 years ago?

I'll promise I'll read the hundreds and hundreds of responses I am certain to receive from Bush lovers, neo-cons, warmongers, suckers, dummies and fools who are jumping to show me the error of my ways.
__________________
You, you, and you, panic. The rest of you follow me.

Last book read: "The Gate House" ~ NelsonDeMille
Now reading: "Nam-A-Rama" ~ Phillip Jennings
Reply With Quote
  #30 (permalink)  
Old 08-21-2008, 04:19 PM
paragon paragon is offline
Commentator
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 888
paragon is a glorious beacon of lightparagon is a glorious beacon of lightparagon is a glorious beacon of lightparagon is a glorious beacon of lightparagon is a glorious beacon of light
Credits: 6,311
Default

Democrats in 2004: We need to leave Iraq!
Republicans in 2004: We will leave if they ask us to
Democrats in 2005: We need to leave Iraq!
Republicans in 2005: We will leave if they ask us to
Democrats in 2006: We need to leave Iraq!
Republicans in 2006: We will leave if they ask us to
Democrats in 2007: We need to leave Iraq!
Republicans in 2007: We will leave if they ask us to
Democrats in 2008: We need to leave Iraq!
Republicans in 2008: We are negotiating with the Iraqi government as to when we will leave

The general idea for those who support the war is that pulling out before Iraq is ready would be like surrendering (similar to what happened at the end of Vietnam).
The general idea for those who do not support the war is that we have to pull out, consequences be (*)(*)(*)(*)ed.

Now that the Iraq government is starting to get to the point where we can pull out, the Republicans are following through with what they've been saying for the entirety of the war and planning for when the US leaves. Thus the withdrawal of Iraq would no longer be viewed as a Vietnam-like 'surrender'.

And so, with the Republicans following through with what they said they would do, anti-war people feel the need to attack them for doing what they said they would do. Also, the anti-war people believe that the democrats were actually right all along when in fact it is the conditions on the ground that have made it so that the US can withdrawal.

Lets say there is a button that should be pressed under certain conditions. Person A is in charge of pressing the button. Person B shouts at person A every minute even though the conditions are not right. After 10 minutes the conditions become right and person A presses the button. Person B says "See I was right you should have pressed the button!"
Person B was not right, just repetitive and annoying.
__________________
"We consider this our duty - to defend humanity against the scourge of intolerance, violence, and fanaticism." -Ahmed Shah Massoud
Ahmed Shah Massoud T-Shirt
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
"Flip-Flopping" Is A Good Thing - The Governator Agrees! muel Current Events 6 07-14-2008 10:59 PM
Larry "Wide Stance" Craig, David "Whoremonger" Vitter Co-Sponsor "Marriage" Amendment The Jovial One Current Events 9 07-02-2008 08:31 AM
Videos from June 13 Iraq Forum, "Reframing the Iraq War Discussion," in Cherry Hill, DemocratsBlog Political Blogs 0 06-27-2008 07:50 AM
Bush: ""We have found the weapons of mass destruction." apotropoxy Current Events 72 04-15-2006 05:10 PM
Bush is "pleased with the progress" in Iraq Hard-Driver Elections & Campaigns 33 09-26-2004 01:26 PM

Sponsored Links

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:56 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0
Template-Modifikationen durch TMS
vBCredits v1.3 ©2007 by Darkwaltz4
Advertisement System V2.1 By   Branden