Oil rises toward $49 - Page 2

redneck · #11 (**permalink**) 09-24-2004, 11:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PJO34";p=&quot

Maybe for exercise we could hook up a bike for Bush also. After all, it is hard to fall off an exercise bike, right?

Better include a seatbelt in the budget. Maybe some body armor.

Liberty · #12 (**permalink**) 09-25-2004, 12:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by catzmeow";p=&quot

I thought the liberal reasoning was that BUSH WANTED OIL PRICES TO INCREASE to benefit his buddies in the energy industry. Now you're suggesting that this will ruin our economy and potentially result in him being voted out of office?

Sorry, y'all can't claim both positions. Either this war was for oil, or it wasn't. Did Bush go to war for cheap oil? Or for expensive oil? You tell me?

Pretzel logic rears it's ugly head again on the left.

Catz

Some on this board would blame Bush for a shortage of Canola because of his "oil connections"

SenaxFlatulus · #13 (**permalink**) 09-25-2004, 07:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Liberty";p=&quot

Some on this board would blame Bush for a shortage of Canola because of his "oil connections"

I KNEW he was up to something with those Corn Farmers in Iowa.

redneck · #14 (**permalink**) 09-25-2004, 12:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Liberty";p=&quot

Some on this board would blame Bush for a shortage of Canola because of his "oil connections"

And then there's some on this board who, if Bush confessed to strangling kittens with his bare hands, would insist it was Clinton's fault.

Sinanju · #15 (**permalink**) 09-25-2004, 01:02 PM

"if Bush confessed to strangling kittens with his bare hands, would insist it was Clinton's fault"

And Kerry would have been for strangling kittens before he was against it!