O give me a break. Boston is probably one of the best cities in the US, so for your standards it may be heaven on earth. But let me tell you, that it's no heaven on earth. It's full of crime and there are plenty of ghettos there. Sure, the ghettos are all kept safely hidden from the city center so visitors won't see them, but they are present. Same gos for NYC, Manhattan is great, but try some parts of Harlem where bullet dodging is a daily task.

__________________
They know... Saddam Hussein is no threat to the US. But at some point he might decide if he had a nuclear weapon to use it against Israel. Gen.W.Clark

Sure, Harlem USED to be dangerous, about 40 years ago. Now it's just a suburb of manhattan.

You want danger? You're not going to find it in HARLEM. Maybe in the Bronx, now, but Harlem has a relatively low crime rate.

And Boston, one of the best cities in the U.S.? ROFLOL. Puhleeze.

Catz

__________________
I'll get nicer when you get smarter.

O of course Catzenberg, how silly of me. Harlem is just like some kind of "fairytale kingdom" where all is sweet and peaceful. Are you kidding me? Besides, I don't even care that much. Even if Harlem was relatively safe and the Bronx was not, the same conclusion could be drawn.

__________________
They know... Saddam Hussein is no threat to the US. But at some point he might decide if he had a nuclear weapon to use it against Israel. Gen.W.Clark

__________________
I'll get nicer when you get smarter.

Yes.

And your point is?

__________________
They know... Saddam Hussein is no threat to the US. But at some point he might decide if he had a nuclear weapon to use it against Israel. Gen.W.Clark

That's my point.

Tell me, did you view Harlem from the deck of a Grayline tour bus?

__________________
I'll get nicer when you get smarter.

No.

And I still don't know what your point is. Does it even matter if I ever pesonally visited Harlem (and stepped out of the tour bus)?

In that case nobody has the right to speak about Palestine, Baghdad etc unless they have toured the area thoroughly.

__________________
They know... Saddam Hussein is no threat to the US. But at some point he might decide if he had a nuclear weapon to use it against Israel. Gen.W.Clark

by doing a data comparison. But you've spoken about Harlem and Boston as if you have personal knowledge, which you quite clearly don't. NOw, if you wish to substantiate your claims with supportive evidence, that's quite another story.

Catz

__________________
I'll get nicer when you get smarter.

So one may speak freely about Fallujah, Palestine, N-Korea and give ones opinion about it, however this does not apply to US cities??

Nice going Catzenbaum.

__________________
They know... Saddam Hussein is no threat to the US. But at some point he might decide if he had a nuclear weapon to use it against Israel. Gen.W.Clark

But she didn't say anything like that did she? She stated a opinion. A Xenophobic opinion i might add.

Your's is however Catz is not. Saying that Europe doesn't have the same concept of Free Speech can never be proved, furthermore she's generalizing the entire of Europe. Again.

I gave a dictionary definition earlier. You seem to have not read this topic.

She unduely says that Europe doesn't have the same concept of free speech that the U.S. has. To me she seems fearful of this hate law.

........... Right. Listen closely. My statement was the same as Catz accept i'd replaced the Countries with races, yes? Now if you admit my statement was racist, and if the definition of racism is 'undue fear or contempt for another race', then can you see how Catz statement is Xenophobic?

So you were saying i have no knowledge on what the the word racist means, because I have explained time after time after time how i was calling Catz Xenophobic not racist. If you would just read the rest of the topic you might be able understand this.

Yep, this clearly stops me arguing about Swedish hate laws and Xenophobia toward Europe.

How exactly would they work this out?

Didn't i use several times in my last ost. It was in one of the many parts you've missed out.

Just like Sweden are dabbling and tweaking with this hate speech law now?

You shout this why? I already told you that.

The U.S. have quotas? What a outrageous opinion!

Right did some. Turns out your lieing :

http://www.dol.gov/dol/topic/hiring/affirmativeact.htm
http://www.dol.gov/esa/regs/compliance/ofccp/aa.htm
http://oaac.co.la.ca.us/
http://www.adversity.net/fed_stats/fednews_USDOL.htm
http://www.post-gazette.com/nation/2...6affirmnp1.asp

Positive discrimination is alive and well in the U.S. (im firmly agianst by the way)

Answer it then, don't sit telling me it me might be a good debate, get on with it.

Oh and this time answer all of my points and the ones you missed out :

'But control over your actions is acceptable? Why is that?'
'Fairness over freedom - how exactly can that be false?'
'No he didn't he drooped all plans to nationalize as soon as industrialists became alarmed. Hitler was of the right. And wasn't it Europeans who also defeated him?'

If you can't reply to these, just admit you lost on those points.

__________________
What's this i hear bed? Word has it you and Pam are sleeping together.