I agree with this seeing as neither side's claim on the land is exactly upstanding in the face of debate. One side hadn't owned the land in several millenia, and the other never officially did.

I am from Israel, originally. My grandfather who still lives there does a lot of interfaith work there trying to help a solution along. While I visited him last time, a elderly Palestinian man told me "I was Jordanian all my life, and then the Jews want to move in and suddenly I'm Palestinian." That about sums up the Palestinian "cause" for me. It's the anti-Semitism of stronger countries using the Palestinians and Israelis as pawns. I don't believe this struggle has much to do with land. Not anymore, anyway.

__________________
“Been living here in galus for a life too long" - Matisyahu

"No, we already know what an A-Bomb is dude. We also know how tiny this whole Israel/Palestine crap is. Why don't you surprise me and give me independent data from a objective institution about the possibility of "nuking"Palestine without destroying/polluting Israel as well. "

It was your original assertion that the use of a nuclear solution is not feasible in Palestine... even after others hove pointed out the differences between the Hiroshima/Nagasaki A-Bomb and the nuclear means we have now....

Perhaps you should back up your original assertion with documentation.. then I will respond with the truth... otherwise you can keep waiting kid....


Oh and BTW... neonimbo... if you are able to completely take away your "compliment" over one issue... then keep the blasted thing.. I don't need it...

Flip-flopper...

__________________
I was banned from godlike productions(over 400 times)... and loved it.

"I haven't made you angry, have I?" -Malcolm Reynolds