Political Forum
     

Go Back   Political Forum > General Political Chat > Current Events


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 11-26-2008, 04:13 PM
Professor Peabody's Avatar
Professor Peabody Professor Peabody is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Republik of Kalifornia
Age: 51
Posts: 9,244
usa us california
Professor Peabody has disabled reputation
Credits: 45,489
Default Obama Picks Another Weiner

Quote:
Obama chooses Volcker as economic adviser
Former Fed chairman will run board to deal with major challenges
By Robert Schroeder, MarketWatch
Last update: 1:12 p.m. EST Nov. 26, 2008
Comments: 68
WASHINGTON (MarketWatch) -- Reiterating that the United States is facing an historic economic crisis, President-elect Barack Obama tapped former Federal Reserve Chairman Paul Volcker to run a new White House advisory board tasked with offering independent advice about how to stage an economic recovery.
Obama named the 81-year-old Volcker to head the President's Economic Recovery Advisory Board, telling reporters at a news conference in Chicago that Volcker is a voice he knows and trusts.
"Paul has been by my side throughout this campaign, providing a deep understanding of financial markets, extensive experience managing economic crises and keen insight into the global nature of this particular crisis," Obama said.

http://www.marketwatch.com/news/stor...7D&dist=msr_23
Mr. Secrecy....Mr. Refuse to cooperate with a Congressional investigation. It wasn't long ago that the libs were continually bash the Bush Administration for not cooperating with Congressional investigations.

Quote:
September 20, 2004
The Volcker Oil-for-Food Commission: Is It Credible?
by Nile Gardiner, Ph.D., and James Phillips

It has been almost six months since United Nations Secretary-General Kofi Annan announced the appointment of the U.N.’s commission of inquiry, headed by Paul Volcker, into the Oil-for-Food scandal.[1] So far, few details have emerged regarding the Commission’s modus operandi, its staff, or its overall effectiveness. The Commission’s operations are shrouded in secrecy, with little transparency or external oversight. For a commission designed to unearth corruption and malpractice on a huge scale, it is strikingly opaque. Its spartan official website contains little information of value, not even a mailing address.[2]

The Volcker Commission is likely to issue its report in a year’s time (though no firm deadline has been set). Its investigation could cost $30 million in all.[3] The Commission bears all the hallmarks of a toothless paper tiger, with no subpoena power, and is clearly open to U.N. manipulation. It bears no enforcement authority (such as contempt) to compel compliance with its requests for information and has no authority to discipline or punish any wrongdoing it discovers.[4]

Volcker’s Refusal to Cooperate with Congressional and Federal Investigations

In meetings on Capitol Hill on July 13, Paul Volcker “rejected requests from members of Congress for access to review documents and to interview United Nations officials being scrutinized by his panel,” reports the New York Times.[7] Congressional sources have confirmed that the Volcker Commission refuses to grant access to internal reports on the Oil-for-Food program produced by the U.N.’s Office of Internal Oversight Services and is unwilling to share documentation that it holds in Baghdad. It also refuses to guarantee that it will release documents relating to the Oil-for-Food program even after it has filed its final report. This hostile approach seriously undermines the credibility of the Independent Inquiry Committee.

http://www.heritage.org/Research/Int...ions/wm569.cfm
Quote:
Since the creation of the United Nations in 1945, the United States has been the biggest contributor to the U.N. The U.S. currently contributes 22 percent of the U.N.'s regular budget. In contrast, France contributes 6.4 percent, Britain 5.54 percent, China 1.53 percent, and Russia 1.2 percent. Total U.S. contributions to the U.N. system in 2001 totaled $3.5 billion, including $612 million in assessed contributions to the U.N. regular budget, $712 million toward U.N. peacekeeping, and $2.2 billion in voluntary contributions.17

http://www.heritage.org/research/Int...ons/bg1748.cfm
The United States dumps billions down that UN corruption hole and Paul Volker refuses to cooperate with a Congressional investigation to see where out tax dollars are going???? Rahm Emanuel refused to cooperate with Congress when he was in the Clinton White House.

I understand many in the Bush Admin did the same thing and they paid the price Nov 4th, but Obama's Presidency is suppose to change that status quo, that's why people voted for him. I think the slogan for Obama's administration will be "Never fails to Disappoint". He hasn't even been sworn in and it back to politicas as usual.....some "CHANGE".
__________________

"Government is like a baby. An alimentary canal with a big appetite at one end and no sense of responsibility at the other." - Ronald Reagan

Last edited by Professor Peabody; 11-26-2008 at 04:16 PM.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Red Cross - Donate Today    Save the Rainforest
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 11-26-2008, 08:47 PM
ABoyNamedSue's Avatar
ABoyNamedSue ABoyNamedSue is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: In Republic of the United States of America
Age: 40
Posts: 7,162
fiji de saxony
ABoyNamedSue has a reputation beyond reputeABoyNamedSue has a reputation beyond reputeABoyNamedSue has a reputation beyond reputeABoyNamedSue has a reputation beyond reputeABoyNamedSue has a reputation beyond reputeABoyNamedSue has a reputation beyond reputeABoyNamedSue has a reputation beyond reputeABoyNamedSue has a reputation beyond reputeABoyNamedSue has a reputation beyond reputeABoyNamedSue has a reputation beyond reputeABoyNamedSue has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 23,960
Default

...'cause nothing says "change" like picking an 81-year old man for the job.

Maybe he'll suggest we go back to trolley cars and telegraph lines to combat global warming.
__________________
Barack Obama: Putting the "Rx" in "MaRXism."

Last edited by ABoyNamedSue; 11-26-2008 at 08:48 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 11-26-2008, 09:31 PM
eellison eellison is offline
Correspondent
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 391
eellison has a spectacular aura abouteellison has a spectacular aura abouteellison has a spectacular aura about
Credits: 2,223
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Professor Peabody View Post
Mr. Secrecy....Mr. Refuse to cooperate with a Congressional investigation. It wasn't long ago that the libs were continually bash the Bush Administration for not cooperating with Congressional investigations.





The United States dumps billions down that UN corruption hole and Paul Volker refuses to cooperate with a Congressional investigation to see where out tax dollars are going???? Rahm Emanuel refused to cooperate with Congress when he was in the Clinton White House.

I understand many in the Bush Admin did the same thing and they paid the price Nov 4th, but Obama's Presidency is suppose to change that status quo, that's why people voted for him. I think the slogan for Obama's administration will be "Never fails to Disappoint". He hasn't even been sworn in and it back to politicas as usual.....some "CHANGE".
God, I laugh at the disposable non-sense that is being posted on some of these websites. You have to be kidding. All the dirt and viciousness coming from the right over the last 12 years makes this post extremely amusing and pointless. How many democrats did Bush put in his administration? There is a difference between change based on policy than one base on personel. You expect for Obama to place corrupt republicans in his inner circle so they can sabotage his goals, objectives or policies. You need to consider the fired U.S. attorneys, national cronyism, making deals with business over consumers and a thousand other points to be made. It makes the possibility of inserting a conservative quite slim. As long as works together the republicans and do what is important for the American people, I don't see a problem with it. It is not what Obama can do for the republican party. It is what Obama can do for the American people. People are before party. If you party screws up their good credit with the American public, then that is their downfall.

I totally disagree with you. His presidency is base on how Obama will treat the republicans verses how the republicans treated the democrats for 12years.

Last edited by eellison; 11-26-2008 at 09:36 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 11-27-2008, 12:26 AM
Professor Peabody's Avatar
Professor Peabody Professor Peabody is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Republik of Kalifornia
Age: 51
Posts: 9,244
usa us california
Professor Peabody has disabled reputation
Credits: 45,489
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by eellison View Post
God, I laugh at the disposable non-sense that is being posted on some of these websites. You have to be kidding. All the dirt and viciousness coming from the right over the last 12 years makes this post extremely amusing and pointless. How many democrats did Bush put in his administration? There is a difference between change based on policy than one base on personel. You expect for Obama to place corrupt republicans in his inner circle so they can sabotage his goals, objectives or policies. You need to consider the fired U.S. attorneys, national cronyism, making deals with business over consumers and a thousand other points to be made. It makes the possibility of inserting a conservative quite slim. As long as works together the republicans and do what is important for the American people, I don't see a problem with it. It is not what Obama can do for the republican party. It is what Obama can do for the American people. People are before party. If you party screws up their good credit with the American public, then that is their downfall.

I totally disagree with you. His presidency is base on how Obama will treat the republicans verses how the republicans treated the democrats for 12years.
Quote:
You need to consider the fired U.S. attorneys, national cronyism, making deals with business over consumers
How did you get there?

Quote:
All the dirt and viciousness coming from the right
How did the 300 investigations launched in the first 100 days of of Democrat rule in the Congress work out? I can't remember but one that made the news, but the rest sure hit the taxpayers in the wallet. Meanwhile, almost all these alternate energy bills just sat in Democrat committees while they pursued their 300 lil witch hunts.

Quote:
2007 Bi-Partisan Alternate Energy Bills Dead in Democrat controlled committees:

H.R.3807 Renewable Energy Assistance Act of 2007
http://www.opencongress.org/bill/110-h3807/show

H.R.2950 United States Energy Storage Competitiveness Act of 2007
http://www.opencongress.org/bill/110-h2950/show

H.R.2947 Energy Efficient Buildings Promotion Act 2007
http://www.opencongress.org/bill/110-h2947/show

H.R.2848 Solar Opportunity and Local Access Rights Act 2007
http://www.opencongress.org/bill/110-h2848/show

H.R.2774 Solar Energy Research and Advancement Act of 2007
http://www.opencongress.org/bill/110-h2774/show

H.R.2441 Renewable Schools Energy Act of 2007
http://www.opencongress.org/bill/110-h2441/show

H.R.2428 Biofuels Research Initiative Act of 2007
http://www.opencongress.org/bill/110-h2428/show

H.R.1945 SUN Act of 2007
http://www.opencongress.org/bill/110-h1945/show

H.R.1772 Rural Wind Energy Development Act 2007
http://www.opencongress.org/bill/110-h1772/show

H.R. 1215 Amends the Energy Policy Act of 2005
http://www.opencongress.org/bill/110-h1215/show

H.R. 729 Home Energy Generation Act 2007
http://www.opencongress.org/bill/110-h729/show
Please explain how the Democrat Congressional power trip of 2007 was more important than moving forward on energy? While they were "investigating nothing" X 300 gasoline was going through the roof.

Talk about non-sense.
__________________

"Government is like a baby. An alimentary canal with a big appetite at one end and no sense of responsibility at the other." - Ronald Reagan
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 11-27-2008, 04:12 AM
Guy Fawkes Guy Fawkes is offline
Banned
Guru
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: California
Posts: 9,730
usa de hesse
Guy Fawkes has a reputation beyond reputeGuy Fawkes has a reputation beyond reputeGuy Fawkes has a reputation beyond reputeGuy Fawkes has a reputation beyond reputeGuy Fawkes has a reputation beyond reputeGuy Fawkes has a reputation beyond reputeGuy Fawkes has a reputation beyond reputeGuy Fawkes has a reputation beyond reputeGuy Fawkes has a reputation beyond reputeGuy Fawkes has a reputation beyond reputeGuy Fawkes has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 1,023
Default

Finger lady coming
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 11-27-2008, 04:21 AM
submarinepainter's Avatar
submarinepainter submarinepainter is offline
Advisor
Guru
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Maine
Posts: 10,019
usa us maine
submarinepainter has a reputation beyond reputesubmarinepainter has a reputation beyond reputesubmarinepainter has a reputation beyond reputesubmarinepainter has a reputation beyond reputesubmarinepainter has a reputation beyond reputesubmarinepainter has a reputation beyond reputesubmarinepainter has a reputation beyond reputesubmarinepainter has a reputation beyond reputesubmarinepainter has a reputation beyond reputesubmarinepainter has a reputation beyond reputesubmarinepainter has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 122,205
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Professor Peabody View Post
How did you get there?



How did the 300 investigations launched in the first 100 days of of Democrat rule in the Congress work out? I can't remember but one that made the news, but the rest sure hit the taxpayers in the wallet. Meanwhile, almost all these alternate energy bills just sat in Democrat committees while they pursued their 300 lil witch hunts.



Please explain how the Democrat Congressional power trip of 2007 was more important than moving forward on energy? While they were "investigating nothing" X 300 gasoline was going through the roof.

Talk about non-sense.
nothing will change the people were fooled again
__________________
Well, I don't exactly know What's going on in the world today Don't know what there is to say About the way the people are treating Each other, not like brothersLeaders take us far away from ecology With mythology and astrology (and -ology)
Has got some words to say About the way we live today , Leon Russell



.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 11-27-2008, 04:42 AM
puffin puffin is online now
Commentator
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,532
puffin has a reputation beyond reputepuffin has a reputation beyond reputepuffin has a reputation beyond reputepuffin has a reputation beyond reputepuffin has a reputation beyond reputepuffin has a reputation beyond reputepuffin has a reputation beyond reputepuffin has a reputation beyond reputepuffin has a reputation beyond reputepuffin has a reputation beyond reputepuffin has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 9,224
Default

Nov. 26
Standing behind his podium at his daily 'news conference' with his patented 'Office of The President Elect.......' sign stuck on the front, (the one MO and the girls wiped up), BO said "What we are going to do is combine experience with fresh thinking". I wonder how 'fresh' Volkers thinking is at 81? The Messiah went on to say it would be "foolish at such a critical time in our history" to pick people who "had no experience in Washington whatsoever". Yes my friends he really said that. He should have thought that one through before he ran for the Presidency. He's surrounding himself with retreaded Clintonistas. That should do the trick.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 11-27-2008, 05:45 AM
terrorist terrorist is offline
Banned
Guru
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 3,854
terrorist has a brilliant futureterrorist has a brilliant futureterrorist has a brilliant futureterrorist has a brilliant futureterrorist has a brilliant futureterrorist has a brilliant futureterrorist has a brilliant futureterrorist has a brilliant futureterrorist has a brilliant futureterrorist has a brilliant futureterrorist has a brilliant future
Credits: 14,911
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Professor Peabody View Post
Mr. Secrecy....Mr. Refuse to cooperate with a Congressional investigation. It wasn't long ago that the libs were continually bash the Bush Administration for not cooperating with Congressional investigations.
are you saying we should buy toilet paper now, because it will soon be more expensive then a dollar?
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 11-29-2008, 07:22 AM
Merkin Merkin is offline
Commentator
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 862
Merkin has much to be proud ofMerkin has much to be proud ofMerkin has much to be proud ofMerkin has much to be proud ofMerkin has much to be proud ofMerkin has much to be proud ofMerkin has much to be proud ofMerkin has much to be proud ofMerkin has much to be proud of
Credits: 7,503
Default coincidence?

For the past five days every time Obama announces a cabinet or advisory appointment the stock market has risen sharply. Coincidence? Perhaps, but this rally hasn't followed good economic or employment news or any action taken by the apparently abdicated current president. This rally has thoroughly discredited premature reactionary ejaculations claiming Obama's harmful effect upon the economy.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 11-30-2008, 04:57 PM
get over it get over it is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,286
get over it has a reputation beyond reputeget over it has a reputation beyond reputeget over it has a reputation beyond reputeget over it has a reputation beyond reputeget over it has a reputation beyond reputeget over it has a reputation beyond reputeget over it has a reputation beyond reputeget over it has a reputation beyond reputeget over it has a reputation beyond reputeget over it has a reputation beyond reputeget over it has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 10,861
Default

The American and world politicos are bravo'ing Obama's picks so far.

What a nice CHANGE it is to have a new president that decides his cabinet/administration by educated/experienced abilities, and makes decisions on what's best for America, instead of being based solely on hard core partisan politics and warped ideology.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
INSECURE obama picks biden. McCain or Obama ? Elections & Campaigns 1 09-27-2008 04:11 AM
Obama Picks Up the Red Phone.... TheHat Elections & Campaigns 7 09-11-2008 12:49 PM
Obama picks Biden i.beletesri Elections & Campaigns 31 08-25-2008 09:11 PM
Obama Picks Biden SeminalBlog Political Blogs 0 08-23-2008 08:40 AM
Castro Picks Clinton/Obama JP5 Elections & Campaigns 21 09-05-2007 05:49 PM

Sponsored Links

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:46 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0
Template-Modifikationen durch TMS
vBCredits v1.3 ©2007 by Darkwaltz4
Advertisement System V2.1 By   Branden