Political Forum
     

Go Back   Political Forum > General Political Chat > Current Events


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 11-17-2004, 10:23 AM
JP5's Avatar
JP5 JP5 is offline
Site Moderator
Guru
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 23,295
us texas
JP5 has a reputation beyond reputeJP5 has a reputation beyond reputeJP5 has a reputation beyond reputeJP5 has a reputation beyond reputeJP5 has a reputation beyond reputeJP5 has a reputation beyond reputeJP5 has a reputation beyond reputeJP5 has a reputation beyond reputeJP5 has a reputation beyond reputeJP5 has a reputation beyond reputeJP5 has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 153,676
Default Oil-For-Food Funds Went to Terrorism

House leaders say Saddam used oil for food money for TERROR. And you guys thought there wasn't a connection between Saddam Hussein and terrorism. The sanctions against Saddam Hussein were not only NOT working, folks. But the illicit deals he was making through the UN....who was thwarting their own so-called sanctions and from other countries who held anti-Iraq war positions, went directly to fund terrorism.....and killed a lot of people. Kofi Anan needs to be brought up on charges, IMO.


"WASHINGTON — Money from the United Nations Oil-for-Food program helped pay the families of Palestinian homicide bombers, the House Committee on International Relations is expected to reveal Wednesday during a hearing on corruption in the Iraqi relief program.

Investigators working for Illinois Republican Rep. Henry Hyde, chairman of the panel, are expected to say they have traced funds from former Iraqi President Saddam Hussein's kickback scheme through a Jordanian bank and into the hands of families of bombers who attacked Israeli citizens."
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,138759,00.html

Oooops!
__________________
"What exactly is this foreign policy experience?" Obama said mockingly of the New York senator. "Was she negotiating treaties? Was she handling crises? The answer is no."
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Red Cross - Donate Today    Save the Rainforest
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 11-17-2004, 10:30 AM
Hansmoleman's Avatar
Hansmoleman Hansmoleman is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Boston, Massachusetts
Posts: 3,281
Hansmoleman is on a distinguished road
Credits: 19,057
Default Why am I not surprised?

Anyone else want to bet that liberals are going to try to refute/defend all this?
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 11-17-2004, 10:38 AM
JP5's Avatar
JP5 JP5 is offline
Site Moderator
Guru
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 23,295
us texas
JP5 has a reputation beyond reputeJP5 has a reputation beyond reputeJP5 has a reputation beyond reputeJP5 has a reputation beyond reputeJP5 has a reputation beyond reputeJP5 has a reputation beyond reputeJP5 has a reputation beyond reputeJP5 has a reputation beyond reputeJP5 has a reputation beyond reputeJP5 has a reputation beyond reputeJP5 has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 153,676
Default Huge UN scandal

Yep. It's amazing, isn't it Hans? Do you think the libs would be on the side of the UN here IF a Democrat were president right now? I mean....I don't know what that would have to do at all with their views. It shouldn't have a thing to do with it.....other than they want to make sure they don't agree with tbis administration or the Republicans on ANYTHING. But this is about right and wrong....and funding terrorism. Everybody......Republicans and Democrats alike should be on the same side of THIS issue. This is the biggest scandal in recent world history. We have a Secretary General of the UN who is intentionally thwarting the investigation......and we have countries who were anti-Iraq war...and anti-holding Saddam Hussein accountable for the UN resolutions who just may have known these funds were going to kill Israeli's. In fact......of course they KNEW it.

Now....the question remain: Are the Democrats in power in our country going to side with Kofi Anan and the UN here?
__________________
"What exactly is this foreign policy experience?" Obama said mockingly of the New York senator. "Was she negotiating treaties? Was she handling crises? The answer is no."
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 11-17-2004, 10:50 AM
Hansmoleman's Avatar
Hansmoleman Hansmoleman is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Boston, Massachusetts
Posts: 3,281
Hansmoleman is on a distinguished road
Credits: 19,057
Default to answer your question...

Quote:
Now....the question remain: Are the Democrats in power in our country going to side with Kofi Anan and the UN here?
with the exception of Joe Lieberman? No.

And I think some Republicans aren't going to focus on this either. The truth is, scandals hurt a lot of people. If this thing is as big as we think it is, it's going to be bad news for the UN, and all the parties involved. Who knows, there may be some Americans involved in this as well. IF there is one thing I know, scandals can be quite hard to crack because so many people are paid hush money. The media and most politicans are going to be very reluctant to uncover this thing.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 11-17-2004, 10:55 AM
Ikari's Avatar
Ikari Ikari is offline
Commentator
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Colorado
Posts: 944
Ikari is on a distinguished road
Credits: 6,911
Default .

*sigh*

Well it's not suprising. However, this will get little press. Why? Because there seems to be some sort of world wide "Let's blame America for all the ills of the world" attitude right now. I deal with it on other sites I go to. Mention that the French and company were not acting out to prevent "American aggression", but to protect their pocket book and watch out. This does point to major problems with the UN, but the world is willing to forgive and look away when the UN is involved for some reason. The UN is corrupt, Oil for Food involved the major opponents to invasion, the facts are clear.
__________________
WAR IS PEACE
FREEDOM IS SLAVERY
IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 11-17-2004, 03:15 PM
PJO34's Avatar
PJO34 PJO34 is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: N.Y.C.
Posts: 5,030
usa us new york
PJO34 will become famous soon enough
Credits: 34,939
Default .

Who could argue that Hussein was a terrible person? This, though, adds nothing to the discussion regarding Iraq. We know that he had ties to terrorists; the whole middle east does (most notably the Saudis). If we are going to use support for palestinian terrorists as the new justification, then we need to start invading every country in the middle east and most of the countries in North Africa. They all have ties to terrorists.
__________________
"George W. Bush surrounds himself with smart people the way a hole surrounds itself with a donut." —Dennis Miller
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 11-17-2004, 03:28 PM
JP5's Avatar
JP5 JP5 is offline
Site Moderator
Guru
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 23,295
us texas
JP5 has a reputation beyond reputeJP5 has a reputation beyond reputeJP5 has a reputation beyond reputeJP5 has a reputation beyond reputeJP5 has a reputation beyond reputeJP5 has a reputation beyond reputeJP5 has a reputation beyond reputeJP5 has a reputation beyond reputeJP5 has a reputation beyond reputeJP5 has a reputation beyond reputeJP5 has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 153,676
Default The thread topic is.....

Quote:
Originally Posted by PJO34";p=&quot View Post
Who could argue that Hussein was a terrible person? This, though, adds nothing to the discussion regarding Iraq. We know that he had ties to terrorists; the whole middle east does (most notably the Saudis). If we are going to use support for palestinian terrorists as the new justification, then we need to start invading every country in the middle east and most of the countries in North Africa. They all have ties to terrorists.
Uhhh....PJ.....this thread is about money from the UN's Oil-For-Food program being diverted to help terrorists. No comment on that???? You do know, don't you, that Saddam Hussein made $22 BILLION off illicit kick-backs and sales when he was supposed to be under UN sanctions????? The kids in Iraq were starving and needed medical help, and Saddam Hussein was funding the families who encouraged their teenagers to strap bombs to themselves and kill themselves along with a bunch of innocent people.
__________________
"What exactly is this foreign policy experience?" Obama said mockingly of the New York senator. "Was she negotiating treaties? Was she handling crises? The answer is no."
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 11-17-2004, 03:44 PM
PJO34's Avatar
PJO34 PJO34 is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: N.Y.C.
Posts: 5,030
usa us new york
PJO34 will become famous soon enough
Credits: 34,939
Default .

Quote:
Originally Posted by JP5";p=&quot View Post
Uhhh....PJ.....this thread is about money from the UN's Oil-For-Food program being diverted to help terrorists. No comment on that???? You do know, don't you, that Saddam Hussein made $22 BILLION off illicit kick-backs and sales when he was supposed to be under UN sanctions????? The kids in Iraq were starving and needed medical help, and Saddam Hussein was funding the families who encouraged their teenagers to strap bombs to themselves and kill themselves along with a bunch of innocent people.
I know what the thread is about. All I am saying is that we knew that Saddam didn't care about his people, and we knew that Saddam funded terrorists, and we knew about the oil-for-food scandal, so today's revelation adds little, if anything, to the discussion regarding Iraq.
__________________
"George W. Bush surrounds himself with smart people the way a hole surrounds itself with a donut." —Dennis Miller
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 11-17-2004, 05:04 PM
MerlinX's Avatar
MerlinX MerlinX is offline
Commentator
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Occupied California
Posts: 1,491
usa us california
MerlinX is a jewel in the roughMerlinX is a jewel in the roughMerlinX is a jewel in the roughMerlinX is a jewel in the rough
Credits: 11,753
Default .

Quote:
Originally Posted by PJO34";p=&quot View Post
All I am saying is that we knew that Saddam didn't care about his people, and we knew that Saddam funded terrorists, and we knew about the oil-for-food scandal, so today's revelation adds little, if anything, to the discussion regarding Iraq.
Until now, we didn't know that it was specifically the Oil-for-food money that was being used to fund terrorists. The same account that was receiving deposits of OFF kickbacks, was being used to cut checks to the families of suicide bombers.

This means that the UN and those countries benefiting from the OFF arrangement, were (I hope unwittingly) funding terrorism. I believe this should add a whole new dimension to the discussion regarding Iraq.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 11-17-2004, 05:20 PM
PJO34's Avatar
PJO34 PJO34 is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: N.Y.C.
Posts: 5,030
usa us new york
PJO34 will become famous soon enough
Credits: 34,939
Default .

Quote:
Originally Posted by MerlinX";p=&quot View Post
Until now, we didn't know that it was specifically the Oil-for-food money that was being used to fund terrorists. The same account that was receiving deposits of OFF kickbacks, was being used to cut checks to the families of suicide bombers.
Money is fungible. In the end, does it matter which money went here and which went there? We knew that he supported terrorists and the source of the money he used is irrelevant to whether we should have invaded or not. It is relevant, though, to the legal case against those implicated in the oil for food scandal. But that is not what we are talking about here.
__________________
"George W. Bush surrounds himself with smart people the way a hole surrounds itself with a donut." —Dennis Miller
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Sponsored Links

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:23 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0
Template-Modifikationen durch TMS
vBCredits v1.3 ©2007 by Darkwaltz4
Advertisement System V2.1 By   Branden