Man Cleared to Remove Wife's Feeding Tube


Email this Story

Feb 25, 3:57 PM (ET)

By VICKIE CHACHERE

(AP) Terri Schiavo gets a kiss from her mother, Mary Schindler, in this Aug. 11, 2001, image taken from...
Full Image








PINELLAS PARK, Fla. (AP) - A judge gave Terri Schiavo's husband permission to remove the brain-damaged woman's feeding tube in three weeks, handing him a victory in his effort to carry out what he says were his wife's wishes not to be kept alive artificially.

The ruling by Pinellas Circuit Court Judge George Greer will allow the husband, Michael Schiavo, to order the tube removed at 1 p.m. on March 18. In the meantime, the woman's parents, who want her kept alive, are expected to ask another court to block the order from taking effect.

The judge wrote that he was no longer comfortable granting delays in the long-running family feud, which has been going on for nearly seven years and has been waged in every level of Florida's court system. He said the case must end.

"The court is no longer comfortable granting stays simply upon the filings of new motions," Greer wrote. "There will always be 'new' issues."


(AP) Right-to-life advocate Randall Terry gestures during a news conference outside the Pinellas County...
Full Image


The tube keeps the 41-year-old disabled woman alive. The husband, Michael Schiavo, says he is seeking to carry out his wife's wishes not to be kept alive artificially.

The decision came on the 15th anniversary of Terri Schiavo's collapse, when a chemical imbalance brought on by an eating disorder caused her heart to stop beating.

The parents were at the Pinellas Park hospice where Terri Schiavo is being cared for when Greer's order was issued. They were planning an afternoon news conference.

Greer previously granted Terri Schiavo's parents, Bob and Mary Schindler, a stay until 5 p.m. Friday.

The judge made his decision after pleadings from the parents that they need more time to pursue additional medical tests which might prove their daughter has more mental capabilities than previously thought.


(AP) The parents of Terri Schiavo won another reprieve in their fight to keep the brain-damaged woman...
Full Image


State officials also are trying to intervene in the case. Attorneys for the Schindlers said the state wants a 60-day stay to investigate allegations that she is being mistreated by being denied appropriate medical care and rehabilitation.

The Schindlers and their son-in-law have fought each other in court since the late 1990s on whether Terri Schiavo should live or die. The two sides have battled through scores of opinions and rulings and tens of thousands of pages of filings.

The feud has taken on elements of a soap opera, with allegations that it began as a fight over more than $1 million awarded to Terri Schiavo in a medical malpractice case which her husband stood to inherit. Michael Schiavo has also been accused by his in-laws of having a conflict of interest in wanting his wife dead because he has started a new family with another woman.

The Schindlers do not believe their daughter is in a persistent vegetative state as court-appointed doctors have ruled.

A leading Vatican cardinal also has weighed in on behalf of keeping Terri Schiavo alive.

"If Mr. Schiavo legally succeeded in provoking the death of his wife, this would not only be tragic in itself, but it would be a serious step toward legally approving euthanasia in the United States," Cardinal Renato Martino, the head of the Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace, told Vatican Radio on Thursday. [look,the only reason the husband,in my opinion,wants her death is for virtually blood money.her parents are more than willing to take care of her.if they let her die of malnutrition-ITS MURDER BY TORTURE!!!!jco]

The money is gone

Do you seriously believe you can have an on-going legal dispute in the courts since the early 1990s and not ring up millions of dollars in legal fees?

Unless you're some kind of idiot, surely you know that the $1 million the husband will inherit is long-since lost to legal fees. The only ones profiting from this case are the attorneys. They may be scum, but the parties themselves, the husband and the parents are fighting this fight for love and for their beliefs.

I understand the right to life position -- but I wish they'd please quit telling lies to try to sway the undecided. The issue is far more complex than just money that has already been spent on lawyers.

ONCE AGAIN FOR THE BRAIN DEAD -- THE MONEY IS LONG GONE. IT'S ABOUT THE ISSUE -- NOT MONEY.