Political Forum
     

Go Back   Political Forum > General Political Chat > Current Events


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 08-02-2005, 12:42 PM
Rebellion's Avatar
Rebellion Rebellion is offline
Site Moderator
Guru
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Boston
Posts: 13,995
usa
Rebellion has a reputation beyond reputeRebellion has a reputation beyond reputeRebellion has a reputation beyond reputeRebellion has a reputation beyond reputeRebellion has a reputation beyond reputeRebellion has a reputation beyond reputeRebellion has a reputation beyond reputeRebellion has a reputation beyond reputeRebellion has a reputation beyond reputeRebellion has a reputation beyond reputeRebellion has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 124,424
Default California court rules same sex couples due same benefits

http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/m...9-1n2golf.html

I'm guessing this case works its way to the supreme court. Unless they refuse to hear it citing it as a state's right's case. Interestingly enough, I read another opinion which said this ruling could help the California case which outlaws same sex marriage. The reason to oppose it is that it denies rights to those couple who are of the same sex. This ruling invalidates that concern.
__________________
All you need to know about the energy crisis:
ANWR Exploration Republicans: 91% Supported. Democrats: 86% Opposed.
Coal-to-liquid R's: 90% YES. D's: 78% NO.
Oil Shale Exploration R's: 90% YES. D's: 86% NO.
Outer Continental Shelf Exploration R's: 81% YES. D's: 83% NO.
Increased Refinery Capacity R's: 97% YES. D's: 96% NO

SUMMARY: 91% of House Republicans have historically voted to increase the production of America’s own oil and gas. 86% of House Democrats have historically voted against.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Red Cross - Donate Today    Save the Rainforest
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 08-02-2005, 06:42 PM
f100supersabr's Avatar
f100supersabr f100supersabr is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Konnektikutska Narodna Respublika
Posts: 8,818
usa us connecticut
f100supersabr has a brilliant futuref100supersabr has a brilliant futuref100supersabr has a brilliant futuref100supersabr has a brilliant futuref100supersabr has a brilliant futuref100supersabr has a brilliant futuref100supersabr has a brilliant futuref100supersabr has a brilliant futuref100supersabr has a brilliant futuref100supersabr has a brilliant futuref100supersabr has a brilliant future
Credits: 42,789
Default Just shows that the courts can be very very wrong, doesn't i

Rebellion wrote
Quote:
I'm guessing this case works its way to the supreme court. Unless they refuse to hear it citing it as a state's right's case. Interestingly enough, I read another opinion which said this ruling could help the California case which outlaws same sex marriage. The reason to oppose it is that it denies rights to those couple who are of the same sex. This ruling invalidates that concern.
Just shows that the courts can be very very wrong, doesn't it.
__________________
"I will not take the low road to the highest office in the land" - Guess Who? You go it !
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Sponsored Links

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:47 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0
Template-Modifikationen durch TMS
vBCredits v1.3 ©2007 by Darkwaltz4
Advertisement System V2.1 By   Branden