Political Forum
     

Go Back   Political Forum > General Political Chat > Current Events


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 08-25-2005, 01:57 PM
Joker's Avatar
Joker Joker is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: the process of locating.
Posts: 4,919
us new jersey
Joker is a name known to allJoker is a name known to allJoker is a name known to allJoker is a name known to allJoker is a name known to allJoker is a name known to all
Credits: 36,577
Default More Troops to Iraq

I read today in the newspaper that the Pentagon is planning to send 1,500 troops to Iraq to assist the troops already there during the two upcoming votes. This seems to contradist the recent talks of pulling troops out of Iraq soon. How can we be considering the possibility of pulling troops out of Iraq and at the same time say we need more troops to stop insurgants from disrupting the national voting process? Once again, the administration is sending us mixed singles about the success of the war.
__________________
LET ME SEE YOUR WAR FACE!!!
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Red Cross - Donate Today    Save the Rainforest
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 08-25-2005, 02:25 PM
JP5's Avatar
JP5 JP5 is offline
Site Moderator
Guru
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 21,172
us texas
JP5 has a reputation beyond reputeJP5 has a reputation beyond reputeJP5 has a reputation beyond reputeJP5 has a reputation beyond reputeJP5 has a reputation beyond reputeJP5 has a reputation beyond reputeJP5 has a reputation beyond reputeJP5 has a reputation beyond reputeJP5 has a reputation beyond reputeJP5 has a reputation beyond reputeJP5 has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 139,828
Default ?

Uh.....that's easy. There are some already scheduled to come home. These 1500 are being sent for the specific purpose you just told us about.

Why is that difficult to understand? There are military personnel going and coming there all the time. I have friends whose son went last September was supposed to stay for a year....but was sent back home in January. It depends on who they need.....and where and when. If you were ever in the military, you'd know how that goes. My husband who was a C-130 pilot during the Vietnam war era......got called in to the base (Forbes AFB in Kansas) one morning and was sent over to the vicinity of Viet Nam. Even I didn't know for some time where they sent him. That's the life of the military.
__________________
"This is a time for a national imperative not to fail in Iraq." Condoleeza Rice, January 11, 2007
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 08-25-2005, 08:30 PM
Joker's Avatar
Joker Joker is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: the process of locating.
Posts: 4,919
us new jersey
Joker is a name known to allJoker is a name known to allJoker is a name known to allJoker is a name known to allJoker is a name known to allJoker is a name known to all
Credits: 36,577
Default .

Yeah, of course soldiers are coming and going throughout any war, but the rate of movement maintains a steady amount of troops. The total number of troops at any given time is basically the same because they come and go at the same rate. Now they are planning to add 1500 more troops to the total. I can't understand why this is necessary if the war is as successful as some people often say. How can we consider this war a success if we have to send 1500 more troops to help fight expected attacks throughout Iraq during voting season?
__________________
LET ME SEE YOUR WAR FACE!!!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 08-26-2005, 07:00 AM
JP5's Avatar
JP5 JP5 is offline
Site Moderator
Guru
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 21,172
us texas
JP5 has a reputation beyond reputeJP5 has a reputation beyond reputeJP5 has a reputation beyond reputeJP5 has a reputation beyond reputeJP5 has a reputation beyond reputeJP5 has a reputation beyond reputeJP5 has a reputation beyond reputeJP5 has a reputation beyond reputeJP5 has a reputation beyond reputeJP5 has a reputation beyond reputeJP5 has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 139,828
Default ?

I remember we did the same thing during their first election. I don't see it as any big deal. 1500 hardly registers percentage-wise. And they probably aren't permanent.
__________________
"This is a time for a national imperative not to fail in Iraq." Condoleeza Rice, January 11, 2007
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 08-26-2005, 07:36 AM
The12thMan's Avatar
The12thMan The12thMan is offline
Site Moderator
Guru
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 12,035
usa us texas
The12thMan has a brilliant futureThe12thMan has a brilliant futureThe12thMan has a brilliant futureThe12thMan has a brilliant futureThe12thMan has a brilliant futureThe12thMan has a brilliant futureThe12thMan has a brilliant futureThe12thMan has a brilliant futureThe12thMan has a brilliant futureThe12thMan has a brilliant futureThe12thMan has a brilliant future
Credits: 106,605
Default .

If memory serves, I have noticed a particular consistency from our troops in Iraq. They seem to all state clearly that we do need more boots on the ground. I don't care if it's the popular thing to do. Just do it.
__________________
Order without liberty and liberty without order are equally destructive. - Theodore Roosevelt
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Sponsored Links

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:30 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0
Template-Modifikationen durch TMS
vBCredits v1.3 ©2007 by Darkwaltz4
Advertisement System V2.1 By   Branden