View Poll Results: Are you willing to participate in 1 on 1 debates here at PoliticalForum?

Voters
123. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes

    54 43.90%
  • No

    43 34.96%
  • Maybe... Some clarification is needed

    30 24.39%
Multiple Choice Poll.
Page 1 of 47 1234511 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 466

Thread: PF Debates: Will You Participate?

  1. Default PF Debates: Will You Participate?

    Pretty straight forward. We'd like to get a preliminary head count of members interested in debate participation (keeping in mind that no structure has been decided on at this point in time... particularly regarding the judging process). Those of you who have contacted me via pm with launch inquiries can make their intentions known here. Thanks in advance


  2. Default

    Thanks.
    Its a may be for me. Gotta see how it works, how much time it would take, depending on the word/post count, and also on subject.
    Some stuff I wouldn't want myself involved in....either none of my business, or something I know too little about.

    Hi

    Don't Blame Me , I Voted For Gary Johnson too
    Thanks Subby

  3. Default

    Depends on the topic or if I'm asked to judge (would that count as participation?).
    Forever Forward

  4. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Agent Zero View Post
    Depends on the topic or if I'm asked to judge (would that count as participation?).
    Only if they don't duck tape us.

    Hi

    Don't Blame Me , I Voted For Gary Johnson too
    Thanks Subby

  5. Default

    Dependent upon final implementation. If the part I referenced earlier changes at any point, I will almost certainly participate. If not, it is most likely that I will not.
    If you would like to see the an increase in the usage of facts and information on the forum, join the Society for the Proliferation of Information. Now accepting members again.
    If you need anything factchecked (or if I suspended an earlier factcheck for my hiatus), send me a message.



  6. #6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by E_Pluribus_Venom View Post
    Pretty straight forward. We'd like to get a preliminary head count of members interested in debate participation (keeping in mind that no structure has been decided on at this point in time... particularly regarding the judging process). Those of you who have contacted me via pm with launch inquiries can make their intentions known here. Thanks in advance
    What about those who asked on the potential judging pool thread?

    http://www.politicalforum.com/forum-...ging-pool.html
    "Those who cannot remember the past, are condemned to repeat it."- American Philosopher George Santayana

  7. #7

    Default

    No way will I participate in this Sham. Who here has the right to ''Judge another Poster'' and why? I can only imagine the Taunting the ''Loser'' will receive,,,LOL
    Just look at some of the ''Gotcha'' posts and you will have an idea, and who are those ''Gotcha'' comments from? Why they are from SOME of the very people that want to be judges,,,HAHAHAHAAH What a JOKE! HAHAHAAHAHAH

    Secondly I would like to see all the other debates here that are having a ''Problem'' due to other posters. I have never had a problem with any debate I have ever had, none. This is a nothing more than a couple of show offs that feel ''They'' deserve their own private thread,,,Selfish Much?
    We have been told other posters may learn from this,,,LOL,,,How utterly arrogant and condescending can you get!!!! I wonder, has it crossed their egotistical little minds that those other posters do not care for how ''They Post''?, and that boring is NOT better,,,it's just boring...

    Put it where it belongs, it's a group, leave our other threads alone.

    This site has always been a open posting one, there is no reason to change that, however if a few posters want to have a private one on one they are welcome to form a group, and have many options open to them. This is where ''EXCLUSIVE'' posting belongs.
    __________________
    Infraction??, but he insulted me FIRST!!
    So report him.He reported you, we usually check reports first. Next time report him
    Oh, I will thanx...

  8. #8

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by FactChecker View Post

    As for the lack of conservative judges: you, yourself, volunteered to be a judge, then withdrew yourself, citing a lack of conservative participation.
    I wasn't paying proper attention and meant I was volunteering to debate. I never even considered judging. Sorry for the misunderstanding.

    This is what Catch posted:
    Quote Originally Posted by Catch
    I don't think the panel would ever allow someone with my views; but for a few of those categories I'd consider it. I don't know who'd want to judge the conspiracy one..
    Potential Judging pool
    Last edited by Trinnity; Jul 09 2011 at 01:52 PM.

  9. Default

    Um yeah, sure. Lets have a one on one debate where the liberals ignore the facts, make emotionally driven arguments, and in the end, have their fellow liberal who consistently troll and flamebait, pose as fair and impartial judges, to in the end, declare the liberal to be the winner of the debate.

    Yeah sure sounds like an activity I'm interested in participating with.

    Note the sarcasm.

    Last edited by John1735; Jul 09 2011 at 02:03 PM.

  10. Default

    I will like to debate in the forum
    .

Page 1 of 47 1234511 ... LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks