Political Forum
     

Go Back   Political Forum > Political Issues > Warfare / Military > Diplomacy & Conflict Resolution


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 03-28-2007, 03:44 AM
DuH2's Avatar
DuH2 DuH2 is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 11,128
usa
DuH2 has a reputation beyond reputeDuH2 has a reputation beyond reputeDuH2 has a reputation beyond reputeDuH2 has a reputation beyond reputeDuH2 has a reputation beyond reputeDuH2 has a reputation beyond reputeDuH2 has a reputation beyond reputeDuH2 has a reputation beyond reputeDuH2 has a reputation beyond reputeDuH2 has a reputation beyond reputeDuH2 has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 55,558
Default UK reveals Iran dispute evidence

Quote:
The Royal Navy says satellite data proves 15 personnel being held in Iran were 1.7 nautical miles inside Iraqi waters when they were seized.
Vice Admiral Charles Style said the sailors were "ambushed" after the search of a vessel and that their detention was "unjustified and wrong".

Prime Minister Tony Blair told the Commons it was now time to "ratchet up" diplomatic pressure on Iran.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/6501555.stm

Iran crossed into Iraqs territorial waters and took "captive/hostage/prisoner" 15 UK Sailors/Marines conducting UN sponsored inspections that have been going on for 4 years.

Fine....
"ratchet up" diplomatic pressure with the unmistakable statement that if they are not relased by the end of the week it will be considered an act of war.
__________________
McCain/Palin 2008
"We make war that we may live in peace"
"Peace is the highest aspiration of the American People. We will negotiate for it, sacrifice for it, we will never surrender for it, now or ever."
"Keep that faith,keep your courage,stick together, stay strong,do not yield,do not flinch,stand up,we're Americans,we'll never surrender they will"
http://members.cox.net/neddy/bobhope_kerfuffles.wmv
http://youtube.com/watch?v=RnfflRNpwKA
http://youtube.com/watch?v=j-QYIP7o2-A
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Red Cross - Donate Today    Save the Rainforest
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 03-28-2007, 06:26 AM
proof-hunter's Avatar
proof-hunter proof-hunter is offline
Commentator
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 929
usa
proof-hunter is a jewel in the roughproof-hunter is a jewel in the roughproof-hunter is a jewel in the rough
Credits: 6,571
Default ..

But, I would also like everyone to notice how silent the UN has been.
This is very disturbing to me, not to hear any remarks
from the UN on this issue, after all they were
patrolling in Iraqi waters under a United Nations mandate.

So what is the UN's comment on this issue? if they are
not against this action made by Iran, then who would
ever want to be the inforcers for the UN, after this?
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 03-28-2007, 06:44 AM
FlakBait's Avatar
FlakBait FlakBait is offline
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 172
usa us california
FlakBait has disabled reputation
Credits: 879
Default .:.

Quote:
Originally Posted by proof-hunter";p=&quot View Post
But, I would also like everyone to notice how silent the UN has been.
This is very disturbing to me, not to hear any remarks
from the UN on this issue, after all they were
patrolling in Iraqi waters under a United Nations mandate.

So what is the UN's comment on this issue? if they are
not against this action made by Iran, then who would
ever want to be the inforcers for the UN, after this?
I think for the moment the UK is best to handle this themselves. There was a unanimous vote by the U.N. Security Council on Saturday to impose new sanctions on Iran already. What’s the UN suppose to say to Iran? “Please forget that we just voted to impose new sanctions for the moment and hand back the troops?” Sanctions in the works and a possible military engagement with the UK is enough to get Iran to think straight.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 03-28-2007, 06:53 AM
merjoem32's Avatar
merjoem32 merjoem32 is offline
Contributor
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 102
merjoem32 is on a distinguished road
Credits: 448
Default .

The UN seems to be pretty powerless today. After all, they US was able to invade Iraq without their authorization. The UN still relies on powerful countries to enforce its laws. The UN is not as respected as it used to be.
__________________
its time to change our democracy
http://www.isupportthismessage.com/
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 03-28-2007, 07:09 AM
hobo's Avatar
hobo hobo is offline
Sr. Correspondent
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Indonesia..California
Posts: 772
hobo is on a distinguished road
Credits: 7,797
Default More games being played

Ready, shoot, aim... Have we heard from the Iranians on this incident yet? I was in the Navy - in the Persian Gulf for 18 months. That was back when the US had one ship in the whole area: the only white ship in the Navy. It was a converted seaplane tender (that's old). It was bristling with antennae and parabolic dishes, but our mission was to "show the flag around the Indian Ocean.

You can never know the true mission of any ship. If it is confidential, secret or top secret, every Navy in the whole world will deny any wrongdoing, especially spying. The area where the incident happened is a pretty sensitive area right now. Lots of ship traffic traveling around there, carrying cargo such as petroleum, legal military armaments, and perhaps illegal stuff as well. I'm pretty sure both the Brits and the US both want to know keep track of what types of ships are coming and going in the region.

Don't get me wrong, I'm pretty sure the Iranians took those Brits captive for a purpose. But it is the never ending game of cat and mouse. Isn't the US playing the same game by taking Iranian hostages from the Iran Embassy. Oh, but they were terrorists...or helping terrorists.

Its all a joke. What the he!l are we and the British doing in that part of the world that could be worth all of these diplomatic headaches. Oh yea, looking for terrorists. Or is it trying to stop Iran from "going nuclear". I know it may seem logical to some people, but have you noticed how tensions ratchet up in the whole world when a superpower and her allies start playing Don Quixote?
__________________
Hobo
Charter member of 'Republicans Who Hate Bush" Club
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 03-28-2007, 07:31 AM
proof-hunter's Avatar
proof-hunter proof-hunter is offline
Commentator
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 929
usa
proof-hunter is a jewel in the roughproof-hunter is a jewel in the roughproof-hunter is a jewel in the rough
Credits: 6,571
Default ...

hobo,
did you miss the boat? you saying that you don't know why we are in that
area? you forgot what sanctions are against Iran, by the UN and who is
enforcing those sanctions?

Iran already has the USA and Brits in a mode to want to take them down.
and it's funny how these countrys like Iran know this yet they
flirt with danger. Saddam did the same, just look at is end as proof.

I always believe that you get what you earn, or work so hard to get.
Iran could comply and there would be no danger, but as I speak
I believe that Iran will fall before the decade is out.

Iran will give the reason to take them down. thats a given.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 03-28-2007, 10:35 AM
ashleykennedy's Avatar
ashleykennedy ashleykennedy is offline
Banned
Analyst
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Stoke-on-Trent
Posts: 2,287
uk european union
ashleykennedy is an unknown quantity at this point
Credits: 23,908
Default The UK naval charts are not accurate.

Both sides are lying?

The 1975 agreement between Iran and Iraq to settle the border in that area has not been updated by the surveys that were to be carried out every decade.

!985 due to Iran/Iraq war, 1995 due to problems with the peace process after the Iran/Iraq war, 2005 due to US invasion of Iraq.

So the territorial waters are disputed by both side. Now saying that you know exactly where the boundary lies is total BS. Iran cannot claim that and neither can the UK.

When the agreed International survey is completed then we could debate
the whys and wherefores of outrageous actions. Until then no-one can say with any precision how far or on which side of the border anyone was.

How do i know? Because I was involved with surveying the straight for the British Military in the 80's.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 03-28-2007, 11:14 AM
proof-hunter's Avatar
proof-hunter proof-hunter is offline
Commentator
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 929
usa
proof-hunter is a jewel in the roughproof-hunter is a jewel in the roughproof-hunter is a jewel in the rough
Credits: 6,571
Default ...

take away the line, does not take away the fact that Iran made the first
act of kidnaping, And seeing that they are going to release the women, you
can already see that from their history, they do this just before they keep
the men for more then a year.

If they don't return the men, then Iran is toast, and gave the US and Brits
the excuse to take them down.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 03-28-2007, 05:37 PM
DuH2's Avatar
DuH2 DuH2 is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 11,128
usa
DuH2 has a reputation beyond reputeDuH2 has a reputation beyond reputeDuH2 has a reputation beyond reputeDuH2 has a reputation beyond reputeDuH2 has a reputation beyond reputeDuH2 has a reputation beyond reputeDuH2 has a reputation beyond reputeDuH2 has a reputation beyond reputeDuH2 has a reputation beyond reputeDuH2 has a reputation beyond reputeDuH2 has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 55,558
Default UK/Iran bilateral links suspended

Quote:
UK/Iran bilateral links suspended

The sailors' ship, HMS Cornwall, patrols Iraqi territorial waters
The UK government has suspended bilateral relationships with Iran until a dispute over the seizure of British sailors from Iraqi waters is resolved.
Foreign Secretary Margaret Beckett told MPs that diplomatic efforts were continuing with Iranian officials to release the 15 navy personnel.

However, other business has been suspended, with "aspects of our policy towards Iran under close review".

Iran seized the personnel five days ago, saying they were in their waters.

Earlier the Ministry of Defence had shown satellite data which it said proved the personnel were 1.7 nautical miles inside Iraqi waters when they were seized.

Vice Admiral Charles Style said the sailors had been "ambushed" after the search of a vessel and that their detention was "unjustified and wrong".


Mrs Beckett, making a statement to the House of Commons on Wednesday, repeated the prime minister's position that the situation had reached "a different phase".

"That is why MoD have today released details of the incident and why I have concluded that we need to focus all our bilateral efforts during this phase to resolution of this issue.

"We will, therefore be imposing a freeze on all other official bilateral business with Iran until this situation is resolved."
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/politics/6503211.stm

IOW the UK has suspedned most Diplmatic relations with Iran.


Quote:
Captives Paraded On TV
Updated: 23:48, Wednesday March 28, 2007

Footage of the 15 British sailors and marines being held in Iran has been aired by Iranian TV.

The video shows the group being arrested, eating food in captivity and carries an interview with Leading Seaman Faye Turney
http://news.sky.com/skynews/article/...257880,00.html

Quote:
Iran: Britain Must Admit Navy Trespassed

Mar 28 07:37 PM US/Eastern


TEHRAN, Iran (AP) - Iran's foreign minister said Wednesday that Britain must admit that its 15 sailors and marines entered Iranian waters in order to resolve a standoff over their capture by Iranian authorities.
Foreign Minister Manouchehr Mottaki's announcement came on a day of escalating tensions, highlighted by an Iranian video of the detained Britons that showed the only woman captive saying her group had "trespassed" in Iranian waters. Britain angrily denounced the video as unacceptable and froze most dealings with the mideast nation.

"First they have to admit that they have made a mistake. Admitting the mistake will facilitate a solution to the problem," Mottaki told The Associated Press in an interview in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. "But unfortunately the British have not admitted their mistake."

Mottaki also backed off a prediction that the female sailor, Faye Turney, could be freed Wednesday or Thursday, but said Tehran agreed to allow British officials to meet with service personnel.

His comments were the first confirmation that Iran agreed to a British request for a consular visit with the crew, though he did not specify when. Iran has not said where the 15 are being held.

"We have accepted that (the British request), there is no problem. Measures are underway (to arrange meeting.) They can meet them," he said.
http://www.breitbart.com/article.php...show_article=1
__________________
McCain/Palin 2008
"We make war that we may live in peace"
"Peace is the highest aspiration of the American People. We will negotiate for it, sacrifice for it, we will never surrender for it, now or ever."
"Keep that faith,keep your courage,stick together, stay strong,do not yield,do not flinch,stand up,we're Americans,we'll never surrender they will"
http://members.cox.net/neddy/bobhope_kerfuffles.wmv
http://youtube.com/watch?v=RnfflRNpwKA
http://youtube.com/watch?v=j-QYIP7o2-A
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 03-29-2007, 07:58 AM
Rebellion's Avatar
Rebellion Rebellion is offline
Site Moderator
Guru
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Boston
Posts: 13,995
usa
Rebellion has a reputation beyond reputeRebellion has a reputation beyond reputeRebellion has a reputation beyond reputeRebellion has a reputation beyond reputeRebellion has a reputation beyond reputeRebellion has a reputation beyond reputeRebellion has a reputation beyond reputeRebellion has a reputation beyond reputeRebellion has a reputation beyond reputeRebellion has a reputation beyond reputeRebellion has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 124,424
Default Little miss so innocent, sugar me

Iran reported the ship in one location initially that was international waters. Then they reported a different location a second time that was Iranian waters. They are full of crap, let the bombing commence if they don't hand the soldiers over.
__________________
All you need to know about the energy crisis:
ANWR Exploration Republicans: 91% Supported. Democrats: 86% Opposed.
Coal-to-liquid R's: 90% YES. D's: 78% NO.
Oil Shale Exploration R's: 90% YES. D's: 86% NO.
Outer Continental Shelf Exploration R's: 81% YES. D's: 83% NO.
Increased Refinery Capacity R's: 97% YES. D's: 96% NO

SUMMARY: 91% of House Republicans have historically voted to increase the production of America’s own oil and gas. 86% of House Democrats have historically voted against.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Sponsored Links

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:03 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0
Template-Modifikationen durch TMS
vBCredits v1.3 ©2007 by Darkwaltz4
Advertisement System V2.1 By   Branden