![]() |
|
|
|||
|
Quote:
Good job UK Good job Iraq Stay the Course. From Oct- Quote:
|
| Sponsored Links |
| Red Cross - Donate Today Save the Rainforest |
|
|||
|
They are ignoring Iraq atm or at best throwing out every negative and the kitchen sink they can find to try to get others to.
Doesn't matter..they have already failed in their efforts. Now we shall see what becomes of an Iraq the Allies did not betray and run out on. So far with the general moves forward and the obvious military success of the past 6 months or so. Things are developing well. One more step on the road to Victory. |
|
|||
|
Quote:
Quote:
Don't have anything to do with Basra or the UK ......just nice stories highlighting "something" noble and notable. |
|
||||
|
THANK YOU DUH !!!!!
You have just shown exactly what the DEMOCRATS have been saying. WITHDRAW OUR TROOPS!!!. Why you think this is some great accomplishment when the British do it, but a failure if the US does it is beyond me... Maybe the SUCCESS IN WITHDRAWL will change your mind. Violence has dropped by 90% in Basra once the British started withdrawing! http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2007/...Iraq-Basra.php Get that Duh... When the occupying forces withdraw, the violence drops. This is exactly what many who have argued for withdrawl has said. The occupation forces are DESTABILIZING... If you withdraw and actually turn Iraq over to Iraqis, then that is success and the "new way forward". This "new way forward" that Bush is touting, i.e. the surge, does not give Iraq back to the Iraqis, and does nothing to promote long term stability. |
|
|||
|
Quote:
Yeah, well.... this is obvious, right? I mean, to "them", this equation isn't about terrorism, right? Duh..... So like, you know, if you want the infidels off your land, and you're fighting 'cause they're there in the first place, then it kinda makes sense, that when you leave, the fighting would stop. Right? Once again... duh..... You see, this is exactly why Bushie is such a moron, 'cause I mean, this whole 4 trillion dollar deal was completely un-necessary..... And I mean, that's why I keep... um.... poking Duh2 in the ribs about that "winning" thing, 'cause I mean, you know, that kinda thing is just.... misguided, is all. You "win" in a horse race, or a baseball game, or you know, a game of chess. You don't "win" in a war. Wars mainly involve a question of whose loss is greater, and who can take more of a hit and still bounce back. You know, like, oh, you think you're gonna destroy our wires? well watch this - drink dirty water for a while, and see how you like them apples.... and so it goes..... There's no "winning" in a war. None. There's only "survival". And I never did get the sense, that "survival" was at stake, with any of this terrorism stuff, or even with Iraq - I mean, any more than "cultural survival" is at stake with the "War on Christmas" ( So I mean, yeah - a modicum of mutual understanding might be helpful in international relations, but I mean, if Bushie the Paranoid insists on believing he has to go around clobbering people on the head to get them to "comply", well.... All that's gonna do, is foster new generations of terrorists. Once again, duh..... Right? |
|
|||
|
You and the Democrats have exactly been saying from the start... "GIVE UP!... RUN HOME!... DON'T LOOK BACK!...ITS ALL WORTHLESS!"
The War is LOST! Up to your britches in the Reids. Hard-Driver wanted to withdraw all troops form Basra/Iraq at the height of terrorist action there..that was "victory" to him and always has been. Merely leaving. That was the Democrats Plan(tm) You just wanted out. Quit trying to act like its yours now that all the effort is starting to pay off. Daily Kos. Violence against the Allied Military has fallen by 90% since the British initally pulled back. Thats not "violence in Basra has dropped by.."..DUH Violence dropped enough to allow the British military to pull back to begin with!... to a great degree becasue of what they did. ..DUH That you/democrast/far left/general anti-war crowd types would be trying to twist the successess occuring to fit your own desires..after YEARS of naysaying..is also a big old DUH http://youtube.com/watch?v=Og-3NssNh_M Quote:
In terms of stability how does the poltical reconciiiation (you yourself pointed to to dismiss the Surge itself while claiming there is no poltical process..yeah) not benefit long term stability?? This is an example of the Policie you have been naysaying for years coming to fruition. Maybe success in withdrawal in a rationale manner will make you willing to support efforts to make such withdrawals rational in other areas of Iraq. Instead of calling for outright withdrawal no matter what the conditions are on the ground as you and the rest have been. IOW Stay the Course! |
|
||||
|
Your post is an incoherent ramble.
Why exactly does the British withdrawing not amount to "give up...run home"? But if the USA does the same thing, then it is? When the British announce a timeline for withdrawl, and then withdraw, you call it a success. But if the USA did the same thing, it is failure. The British announced their withdrawl long before the surge started.. But somehow you seem to be claiming the stability from the surge makes it possible... yea, right. Obviously it is impossible to say what "would have happened" if the other road had been taken. If the United States declared victory in Iraq 2 years ago when there were sucessful elections and laid out a reasonable timeline for transitioning Iraq back to the Iraqi's. So it is impossible to compare and contrast. What we do know is that the road taken has been very rough. And the fact that the violence is down recently, but the political reconcilliation needed is still missing, is far from any testiment to success. What we also do know is that the British made a commitment to withdrawl and that withdrawl has not hindered Iraq, but actually appears to have cut the violence. |
|
|||
|
Some seem willingly influenced by political rhetoric. Behind all of that is reality:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...080601401.html
__________________
See, free nations are peaceful nations. Free nations don't attack each other. Free nations don't develop weapons of mass destruction. - G.W. Bush, 10/3/2003 |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|