Political Forum
     

Go Back   Political Forum > Political Issues > Warfare / Military > Diplomacy & Conflict Resolution


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 03-18-2008, 12:49 AM
f0ca1's Avatar
f0ca1 f0ca1 is offline
Analyst
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: The Greatest City in the world
Posts: 3,156
usa us new york
f0ca1 has much to be proud off0ca1 has much to be proud off0ca1 has much to be proud off0ca1 has much to be proud off0ca1 has much to be proud off0ca1 has much to be proud off0ca1 has much to be proud off0ca1 has much to be proud off0ca1 has much to be proud of
Credits: 12,460
Default Supreme Court to Decide Gun-Ban Case

http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20080318...weaponsjustice

Personally, I'm expecting a return of the conservative's fairweather friend: the "activist" judge.

The second amendment clearly refers to "the people" not individuals, and just as you can get arrested for certain expressions in certain circumstances, I see nothing in the constitution that prohibits municipalities from barring arms.

I understand the desire and necessity for people in rural places to keep guns; but in a city, there's only one thing to shoot at.

Moreover, anybody that thinks everybody in DC should be allowed to be packing has probably never been to DC.

Last edited by f0ca1; 03-18-2008 at 12:50 AM.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Red Cross - Donate Today    Save the Rainforest
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 03-18-2008, 03:09 AM
BroncoBilly's Avatar
BroncoBilly BroncoBilly is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: The socialist republic of Kalifornia
Posts: 4,667
BroncoBilly has a brilliant futureBroncoBilly has a brilliant futureBroncoBilly has a brilliant futureBroncoBilly has a brilliant futureBroncoBilly has a brilliant futureBroncoBilly has a brilliant futureBroncoBilly has a brilliant futureBroncoBilly has a brilliant futureBroncoBilly has a brilliant futureBroncoBilly has a brilliant futureBroncoBilly has a brilliant future
Credits: 50,182
Default You lose

Quote:
Originally Posted by f0ca1 View Post
http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20080318...weaponsjustice

Personally, I'm expecting a return of the conservative's fairweather friend: the "activist" judge.

The second amendment clearly refers to "the people" not individuals, and just as you can get arrested for certain expressions in certain circumstances, I see nothing in the constitution that prohibits municipalities from barring arms.

I understand the desire and necessity for people in rural places to keep guns; but in a city, there's only one thing to shoot at.

Moreover, anybody that thinks everybody in DC should be allowed to be packing has probably never been to DC.
Nice try to your misinterpretation of the constitution, I guess if you believe something long enough it will be at least true in your mind, but thank God, our laws don't follow your kind of thinking. DC is the known as the murder capital, and they have had these stupid ineffective gun ban in place since 1975, yeah, that seemed to work....for the bad guys.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crime_in_Washington,_D.C.


Like many other large cities, Washington, D.C., has enacted a number of strict gun-restriction laws. The Firearms Control Regulations Act of 1975 prohibited residents from owning handguns, excluding handguns registered prior to February 5, 1977. Other local laws prohibit carrying guns (concealed or not), and all guns and ammunition must be registered.[7]


Violent crime has dropped drastically in the United states in the last 15 years, and our gun laws are still in tact, keeping people productive lowers crime rate, not gun bans.


http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/...09-crime_x.htm
__________________
Cheney is the second executive officer to shoot someone in the face and chest. Clinton was the first.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 03-18-2008, 05:18 AM
Truth-Bringer's Avatar
Truth-Bringer Truth-Bringer is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 4,585
Truth-Bringer is a splendid one to beholdTruth-Bringer is a splendid one to beholdTruth-Bringer is a splendid one to beholdTruth-Bringer is a splendid one to beholdTruth-Bringer is a splendid one to beholdTruth-Bringer is a splendid one to beholdTruth-Bringer is a splendid one to behold
Credits: 43,904
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by f0ca1 View Post
Personally, I'm expecting a return of the conservative's fairweather friend: the "activist" judge.
Personally, I expect more collectivist statism from our corrupt, idiot judges.

Quote:

The second amendment clearly refers to "the people" not individuals,
The people are a collection of individuals. No rights supercede the rights of individuals. And the militia refers to the people at large.

Quote:
I understand the desire and necessity for people in rural places to keep guns; but in a city, there's only one thing to shoot at.
If a criminal threatens you with a gun, then you should shoot him or her. Then there will be fewer criminals.
__________________
"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident." - Schopenhauer
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 03-18-2008, 09:17 AM
f0ca1's Avatar
f0ca1 f0ca1 is offline
Analyst
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: The Greatest City in the world
Posts: 3,156
usa us new york
f0ca1 has much to be proud off0ca1 has much to be proud off0ca1 has much to be proud off0ca1 has much to be proud off0ca1 has much to be proud off0ca1 has much to be proud off0ca1 has much to be proud off0ca1 has much to be proud off0ca1 has much to be proud of
Credits: 12,460
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Truth-Bringer View Post

The people are a collection of individuals.
A collective, as it were.

Yes.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 03-18-2008, 09:27 AM
f0ca1's Avatar
f0ca1 f0ca1 is offline
Analyst
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: The Greatest City in the world
Posts: 3,156
usa us new york
f0ca1 has much to be proud off0ca1 has much to be proud off0ca1 has much to be proud off0ca1 has much to be proud off0ca1 has much to be proud off0ca1 has much to be proud off0ca1 has much to be proud off0ca1 has much to be proud off0ca1 has much to be proud of
Credits: 12,460
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BroncoBilly View Post
Quote:
Since 1993, crime rates in Washington dropped consistently for over ten years.

Somebody explain the logic that guns would cause a decrease in crimes.

A case in point would be great.

None of the same hypotheticals used to support libertarian utopias. I don't indulge that stuff.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 03-18-2008, 10:39 AM
BroncoBilly's Avatar
BroncoBilly BroncoBilly is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: The socialist republic of Kalifornia
Posts: 4,667
BroncoBilly has a brilliant futureBroncoBilly has a brilliant futureBroncoBilly has a brilliant futureBroncoBilly has a brilliant futureBroncoBilly has a brilliant futureBroncoBilly has a brilliant futureBroncoBilly has a brilliant futureBroncoBilly has a brilliant futureBroncoBilly has a brilliant futureBroncoBilly has a brilliant futureBroncoBilly has a brilliant future
Credits: 50,182
Default Yep

Quote:
Originally Posted by f0ca1 View Post
Somebody explain the logic that guns would cause a decrease in crimes.

A case in point would be great.

None of the same hypotheticals used to support libertarian utopias. I don't indulge that stuff.
Gun crimes have dropped dramatically nationwide since 1993, and that is due to tougher laws, like 3 strikes. Not hypothetical, but a fact.
__________________
Cheney is the second executive officer to shoot someone in the face and chest. Clinton was the first.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 03-18-2008, 10:43 AM
Truth-Bringer's Avatar
Truth-Bringer Truth-Bringer is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 4,585
Truth-Bringer is a splendid one to beholdTruth-Bringer is a splendid one to beholdTruth-Bringer is a splendid one to beholdTruth-Bringer is a splendid one to beholdTruth-Bringer is a splendid one to beholdTruth-Bringer is a splendid one to beholdTruth-Bringer is a splendid one to behold
Credits: 43,904
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by f0ca1 View Post
A collective, as it were.

Yes.
But the collective has no separate existence apart from the individuals. As a non-existent entity, the collective cannot assume rights that supercede the rights of the individuals.

I thought I had trained you on this over at Perspectives, f0ca1?
__________________
"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident." - Schopenhauer
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 03-18-2008, 10:45 AM
f0ca1's Avatar
f0ca1 f0ca1 is offline
Analyst
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: The Greatest City in the world
Posts: 3,156
usa us new york
f0ca1 has much to be proud off0ca1 has much to be proud off0ca1 has much to be proud off0ca1 has much to be proud off0ca1 has much to be proud off0ca1 has much to be proud off0ca1 has much to be proud off0ca1 has much to be proud off0ca1 has much to be proud of
Credits: 12,460
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BroncoBilly View Post
Gun crimes have dropped dramatically nationwide since 1993, and that is due to tougher laws, like 3 strikes. Not hypothetical, but a fact.
That, or the economic boom that started about that time.

Correlation is not causation.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 03-18-2008, 10:50 AM
Truth-Bringer's Avatar
Truth-Bringer Truth-Bringer is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 4,585
Truth-Bringer is a splendid one to beholdTruth-Bringer is a splendid one to beholdTruth-Bringer is a splendid one to beholdTruth-Bringer is a splendid one to beholdTruth-Bringer is a splendid one to beholdTruth-Bringer is a splendid one to beholdTruth-Bringer is a splendid one to behold
Credits: 43,904
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by f0ca1 View Post
Somebody explain the logic that guns would cause a decrease in crimes.
I'd like for the liberals to explain the logic behind their belief that merely having a gun immediately turns someone into a raging, violent criminal.

Quote:
A case in point would be great.

None of the same hypotheticals used to support libertarian utopias. I don't indulge that stuff.
Let's look at the stats and let's look at what's going on with the criminal justice system in relation to gun crimes:

* In the United States during 1997, there were 15,289 murders. Of these, 10,369 were committed with firearms. (2)

(two-thirds with firearms - one third without. Obviously, guns aren't the sole issue...)

* In the United States during 1997, there were approximately 7,927,000 violent crimes. Of these, 691,000 were committed with firearms. (12)

(Now with overall violent crimes, we see that guns are a much smaller percentage - less than 10%)

* As of 1992, for every 14 violent crimes (murder, rape, etc…) committed in the United States, one person is sentenced to prison. (62)

(So, golly gee, Wally, you think not punishing people for committing violent crimes might be more of an incentive for them to commit them in the future????)

* As of 1992, average length of imprisonment for:

Murder 10.0 years
Rape 7.6 years
Aggravated Assault 3.4 years
(63)


(And the ones that do get sentenced aren't serving long sentences... If you murder someone - that should be an automatic life sentence.)

* In the early/mid 1990's, criminals on parole or early release from prison committed about 5,000 murders, 17,000 rapes, and 200,000 robberies a year. (3)

(Proving the above assertion - the criminals being released early or unpunished are committing more violent crimes - well isn't that just shocking...)

* Americans use firearms to defend themselves from criminals at least 764,000 times a year. This figure is the lowest among a group of 9 nationwide surveys done by organizations including Gallup and the Los Angeles Times. (16b)

(So that's 764,000 people you'd rather see murdered or raped by criminals if you had your way, Mr. Gun Banner. Yes, let's just all be defenseless victims and wait for the "justice system" who we've already seen isn't locking criminals up, protect us. ROTFL.)

* In 1982, a survey of imprisoned criminals found that 34% of them had been "scared off, shot at, wounded or captured by an armed victim." (16c)

(So an armed populace is indeed a deterrance to crime)

* Washington D.C. enacted a virtual ban on handguns in 1976. Between 1976 and 1991, Washington D.C.'s homicide rate rose 200%, while the U.S. rate rose 12%. (1)


(Gee, that gun ban didn't work so good, now did it?)

Link
__________________
"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident." - Schopenhauer

Last edited by Truth-Bringer; 03-18-2008 at 10:51 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 03-18-2008, 10:52 AM
Truth-Bringer's Avatar
Truth-Bringer Truth-Bringer is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 4,585
Truth-Bringer is a splendid one to beholdTruth-Bringer is a splendid one to beholdTruth-Bringer is a splendid one to beholdTruth-Bringer is a splendid one to beholdTruth-Bringer is a splendid one to beholdTruth-Bringer is a splendid one to beholdTruth-Bringer is a splendid one to behold
Credits: 43,904
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by f0ca1 View Post
That, or the economic boom that started about that time.

Correlation is not causation.
And if the government were to stop taxing people so much, and causing inflation through printing excess fiat currency, maybe they wouldn't be as inclined to steal from others...
__________________
"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident." - Schopenhauer
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Georgia Supreme Court throws out oral sex case raytri Current Events 127 11-03-2007 09:01 PM
Supreme court wimps out on Padilla case. So much for the fif ben-franklin Current Events 1 04-03-2006 08:20 AM
Supreme Court to hear Texas redistricting case raytri Current Events 63 03-03-2006 02:44 PM
Supreme Court to Decide on Partial Birth Abortion ForceoftheTruth Current Events 86 03-02-2006 04:49 AM

Sponsored Links

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:40 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0
Template-Modifikationen durch TMS
vBCredits v1.3 ©2007 by Darkwaltz4
Advertisement System V2.1 By   Branden