Political Forum  

Go Back   Political Forum > Political Issues > Other Political Issues > Education

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 03-06-2008, 07:14 AM
JavaBlack's Avatar
JavaBlack JavaBlack is offline
Site Moderator
Guru
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Michigan
Age: 29
Posts: 12,158
usa us michigan
JavaBlack is a splendid one to beholdJavaBlack is a splendid one to beholdJavaBlack is a splendid one to beholdJavaBlack is a splendid one to beholdJavaBlack is a splendid one to beholdJavaBlack is a splendid one to beholdJavaBlack is a splendid one to behold
Credits: 81,120
Default Teaching Boys and Girls Differently

There are a lot of findings in psychology that suggest boys and girls develop differently and at different rates in their schooling years. There's a reason why boys are more likely to give up interest in school early and fail... and why girls give up on math and science in the high school years... some nature, some nurture.

For starting the discussion I'll bring up this from Scientific American.
http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=...-with-language

Apparently girls learn language in a more efficient manner that is more abstract (not socking since girls have a more efficient connection between the left and right hemispheres).
This causes girls to learn language easily through either hearing speech or reading... while boys are likely to need both.

Is this something that can be applied in education?
Perhaps it's best to teach this in a manner that suits the boys... as repitition certainly isn't going to hurt the girls' understanding.
__________________
"It's never over... BOY!"
The Tall Man, Phantasm III
what your pet really thinks of you...
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 03-06-2008, 10:22 AM
BillyBob's Avatar
BillyBob BillyBob is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Music City USA
Posts: 3,435
usa us tennessee
BillyBob has much to be proud ofBillyBob has much to be proud ofBillyBob has much to be proud ofBillyBob has much to be proud ofBillyBob has much to be proud ofBillyBob has much to be proud ofBillyBob has much to be proud ofBillyBob has much to be proud ofBillyBob has much to be proud ofBillyBob has much to be proud of
Credits: 13,184
Default

You make a good case for gender specific schools.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 03-06-2008, 10:31 AM
raytri's Avatar
raytri raytri is offline
Site Moderator
Guru
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Minnesota
Age: 40
Posts: 14,511
usa us minnesota
raytri is a splendid one to beholdraytri is a splendid one to beholdraytri is a splendid one to beholdraytri is a splendid one to beholdraytri is a splendid one to beholdraytri is a splendid one to beholdraytri is a splendid one to beholdraytri is a splendid one to behold
Credits: 92,594
Default

I'm just starting to read this article in the NYT Sunday Magazine from March 2:
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/02/ma.../02sex3-t.html

Just started it, so I can't comment intelligently on its contents yet.

In general, I think there's something to be said for the fact that boys and girls learn differently and have different attention spans, and that single-gender learning environments can eliminate some of the gender-difference distractions in a classroom.

The question for me, though, is whether those advantages are large enough or important enough to outweigh the presumed social benefits of learning to navigate in a two-gender world. Will segregation make either boys or girls less able to deal with that world when they grow up?

Plus there's the "does one size fit all?" question. As a matter of statistics, some boys and girls will do better in a mixed environment than in a segregated one, even if in general segregated classes produce better results.
__________________
Scarred survivor of the April 2008 Mod War.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 03-06-2008, 10:59 AM
JavaBlack's Avatar
JavaBlack JavaBlack is offline
Site Moderator
Guru
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Michigan
Age: 29
Posts: 12,158
usa us michigan
JavaBlack is a splendid one to beholdJavaBlack is a splendid one to beholdJavaBlack is a splendid one to beholdJavaBlack is a splendid one to beholdJavaBlack is a splendid one to beholdJavaBlack is a splendid one to beholdJavaBlack is a splendid one to behold
Credits: 81,120
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by raytri View Post
The question for me, though, is whether those advantages are large enough or important enough to outweigh the presumed social benefits of learning to navigate in a two-gender world. Will segregation make either boys or girls less able to deal with that world when they grow up?
That's the same thing I'm thinking.
Maybe the key is to isolate the particularr subjects at particular times where disparity is greatest and seperate by gender for those things only.
Also I think we can bypass a lot of the gender issues by moving toward "academy" model schools with smaller classes and more individualized attention.
That would actually allow for each student to get the education he/she needs.

But it would be helpful for educators in any case to understand these differences and apply them.
__________________
"It's never over... BOY!"
The Tall Man, Phantasm III
what your pet really thinks of you...
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 03-12-2008, 11:54 AM
constitution101 constitution101 is offline
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 166
constitution101 will become famous soon enoughconstitution101 will become famous soon enough
Credits: -11
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JavaBlack View Post
There are a lot of findings in psychology that suggest boys and girls develop differently and at different rates in their schooling years. There's a reason why boys are more likely to give up interest in school early and fail... and why girls give up on math and science in the high school years... some nature, some nurture.

For starting the discussion I'll bring up this from Scientific American.
http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=...-with-language

Apparently girls learn language in a more efficient manner that is more abstract (not socking since girls have a more efficient connection between the left and right hemispheres).
This causes girls to learn language easily through either hearing speech or reading... while boys are likely to need both.

Is this something that can be applied in education?
Perhaps it's best to teach this in a manner that suits the boys... as repitition certainly isn't going to hurt the girls' understanding.
I don't know how accurate this is, I'm a guy, but back in high school I hated math and science (especially Chemistry), and love language classes.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 03-12-2008, 12:55 PM
Odin's Avatar
Odin Odin is offline
Contributor
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 130
Odin has disabled reputation
Credits: 438
Default

.
this t o teach différent are wrong. why dont in school give goo d teachers to students so we can lehrn subjkets.
.
__________________
Globalisation has made us more vulnerable. It creates a world without borders, and makes us painfully aware of the limitations to meet its challenges.
Anna Lindh

Everything will be all right when people stop thinking of the United Nations as a weird Picasso abstraction and see it as a drawing they made themselves.
Dag Hammarskjold

It's not only hockey, it's every sport. You know, it's a big event.
Peter Forsberg
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 04-30-2008, 07:57 AM
will2power's Avatar
will2power will2power is offline
Observer
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Colonial Heights, VA
Age: 36
Posts: 46
usa us virginia
will2power has a spectacular aura aboutwill2power has a spectacular aura about
Credits: 571
Send a message via ICQ to will2power Send a message via Yahoo to will2power
Default

I think it's time to change the nature of the school dynamic. I don't think that it's prudent to entirely segregate populations, but I do think that we would be better served by putting students of the same learning styles in a classroom together with a teacher that shows success in teaching in that particular style.

basic learning styles being:
Quote:
* Auditory learning occurs through hearing the spoken word.
* Kinesthetic learning occurs through doing and interacting.
* Visual learning occurs through looking at images, mindmaps, demonstrations and body language.
There are certainly differences among these general styles, but I think that an exposure to a variety of difference under these general classes might expose students to new methodologies.

I hesitate to embrace a full separation because the young men and women need the experience of interacting with one another in a social environment and a workplace type environment to adjust to the outside world when they're done with school. Perhaps if it were done where boys and girls were in different wings of the same facility with some shared activities between them might do.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks
Digg del.icio.us StumbleUpon Google Yahoo Furl Reddit

Thread Tools
Display Modes

 
Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
And This Punk Was Teaching Kids crestwood33 Current Events 18 11-27-2007 12:30 PM
Teaching Evolution and Creationisim in Schools SaphirePhoenix Education 4 06-19-2007 12:25 PM
Woman Crashes Car Teaching Dog to Drive ForceoftheTruth Off-Topic Chat 3 08-29-2006 04:46 PM
Hello: Is Feminism making boys girls equal or girls better? Perseption Current Events 2 03-03-2006 10:27 AM
Teaching Declaration of Indepence Against School Rules barney-fife Current Events 27 12-01-2004 12:13 PM


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:11 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0 Release Candidate 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0
Template-Modifikationen durch TMS
vBCredits v1.3 ©2007 by Darkwaltz4