Social Conservatives just won't vote, that's a plus for democrats.

__________________
I've been informed....don't blame Bush, he's "not in control"
That must make him out of control

On the topic of elections, what do all of you think of these ideas?

http://www.politicalforum.com/viewtopic.php?t=16000

__________________
"I am a Tory Anarchist. I should like every one to go about doing just as he pleased- short of altering any of the things to which I have grown accustomed." (Max Beerbohm)

I think he'll have a tough road to hoe, maybe if he got a VP first. But since this was about who I'd like I'd pick him, even if I disagree with him on major issues. I think he'd be good for what we need now.

__________________
All you need to know about the energy crisis:
ANWR Exploration Republicans: 91% Supported. Democrats: 86% Opposed.
Coal-to-liquid R's: 90% YES. D's: 78% NO.
Oil Shale Exploration R's: 90% YES. D's: 86% NO.
Outer Continental Shelf Exploration R's: 81% YES. D's: 83% NO.
Increased Refinery Capacity R's: 97% YES. D's: 96% NO

SUMMARY: 91% of House Republicans have historically voted to increase the production of America’s own oil and gas. 86% of House Democrats have historically voted against.

I think you're right, he could come in as a VP.

__________________
I've been informed....don't blame Bush, he's "not in control"
That must make him out of control

Penn Gillette, with Teller as VP.
Then after he loses the next election or leaves office after a sex scandal, there will be plenty of material for another season of B____S___.

__________________
"Man lives in the sunlit world of that which he believes to be reality. But unseen by most is an underworld, a place that is just as real... but not as brightly lit... A DARK SIDE!"
-opening from Tales From the Darkside

...comes-in second....

__________________
"A man's work is nothing but this slow trek to rediscover, through the detours of art, those two or three great and simple images in whose presence his heart first opened."

I'd like to see some real competition in this next election. A real debate of ideas, and an exchange of "real" information that our nation sorely needs at this point. I'm very tired of being forced into a choice between the lesser of two evils (like a McCain-Hillary thing, for instance).

As you say, it's a bit early, but here's what I'm thinking at this point:

Dems - Mark Warner. He's a founding father of Nextel (so he knows business), and he also seems to have done an excellent job on behalf of his state when he was governor. He has a decent financial background, and he's chock-full of good ideas.

Reps - "maybe" Mitt Romney. Not sure yet. He's done some pretty strange stuff in his state, but a lot of it seems to have worked. This latest healthcare thing is pure genius, it's astoundingly simple but it definitely makes sense. He seems like a smart guy. I haven't investigated his financial background yet though.

someone not represented by any corporation or interest group (therefor someone representing working class, society)
and my wish will not come true, because media is corporation owned and they have people on it telling us that government owned media would be like communism and communism like in USSR was infact a corporation thing as well, one big communist corporation, no elections... just like in USA.

A true conservative (I don't think we've really had one since Ike...).

One that's small government, doesn't expand executive power, follows through with key legislation (Bush copped out on Social Security and immigration), and - most importantly - is accountable. The current GOP has become what they once hated: the stereotypical liberal that blames everyone else for his problems or shortcomings.

So in one word: a paleoconservative.

__________________
Proudly a "South Park Republican"

Can you name one that's in the running?

__________________
I've been informed....don't blame Bush, he's "not in control"
That must make him out of control