Thread: Electoral Map: Not Good News for Obama

Originally Posted by stekim

According to this map, Obama is doing fine.

http://www.electionprojection.com/20...resident12.php

I don't know what that map showed when you posted it, but it is funny that 80 electors were lost by Obama and picked up by Romney recently.

EVC stands at 285 Obama and 253 Romney as of this post. Race is tightening up already.

Obama makes gains in most recent Electoral College map projection

President Obama has gained a larger lead in the most recent Electoral College map projection, winning with 314 electoral votes compared to 224 for Mitt Romney. The last update gave Obama with 285 votes compared to Romney 253 votes. The change entirely is attributed to a projected victory for President Obama in Florida. The state is very close, but the most recent poll shows President Obama up by four points, perhaps a reflection on his administration’s most recent immigration directive.

More at link:

http://www.examiner.com/article/obam...n?CID=obinsite

Originally Posted by big daryle

Frankly, I think only property owners should be allowed to vote. If you really do not have skin in the game, you will not vote sensibly.

So why do you conservative always want to restrict freedom and representation?
Why the moves to restrict voting?

Wasn't that long ago that the WaPo,NYTimes,LATimes,Chicago Tribune etc.etc. didn't have to worry about being challenged too much. The WaPo must've been worried about their market share in June 2011. A year later,they've been shown to be so wrong then. They should be worried about their market share/declining readership.

Originally Posted by Craftsman

So why do you conservative always want to restrict freedom and representation?
Why the moves to restrict voting?

You mean restricting it to citizens? Why do Democrats want to allow non citizens to vote?

Originally Posted by Hoosier8

You mean restricting it to citizens? Why do Democrats want to allow non citizens to vote?

A 90 year old WWII veteran was one of those purged from Florida's voting rolls. He was a citizen.

Coincidentally, he's also a Democrat. In a state ran by Republicans. In an election year.

Hm.

Originally Posted by The Real American Thinker

A 90 year old WWII veteran was one of those purged from Florida's voting rolls. He was a citizen.

Coincidentally, he's also a Democrat. In a state ran by Republicans. In an election year.

Hm.

He wasn't purged, just asked to provide proof of citizenship. He will still vote. Much todo about nothing.

Originally Posted by Hoosier8

He wasn't purged, just asked to provide proof of citizenship. He will still vote. Much todo about nothing.

And you see no problem with asking a 91 year old WWII veteran to "prove" his citizenship?

He served this country and put his life on the line in what was perhaps our darkest need, and he has to PROVE his citizenship?

Originally Posted by The Real American Thinker

And you see no problem with asking a 91 year old WWII veteran to "prove" his citizenship?

He served this country and put his life on the line in what was perhaps our darkest need, and he has to PROVE his citizenship?

You see no real problem with the DOJ not giving the States the list of illegal aliens they have, which they are supposed to do by law which would be the quickest way to identify illegal voters?

Originally Posted by Hoosier8

You see no real problem with the DOJ not giving the States the list of illegal aliens they have, which they are supposed to do by law which would be the quickest way to identify illegal voters?

Of course I see a problem with it. It sucks. What's your point?