Link shortened by moderator
Quote:
So nothing can go wrong for the Democrats. Can it?
Of course it can, and not just because of the party's perennial penchant for cutting off its nose to spite its face.
|
Quote:
|
[Al Gore], had initially been deemed a winner, the potential recipient of a landslide rather than a narrow popular-vote majority. The signs were nearly as good for Democrats then as they are now.
|
Quote:
|
So far her post-first-lady record suggests a follower rather than a leader. She still can't offer a credible explanation of why she gave President Bush the authority to go to war in Iraq. That's because her votes had more to do with hedging her political bets than with principle. Nor has she explained why it took her two years of the war going south to start speaking up against it. She was similarly tardy with her new health care plan, waiting to see what heat Mr. Edwards and Senator Obama took with theirs. She has lagged behind the Democratic curve on issues ranging from the profound (calling for an unequivocal ban on torture) to the trivial (formulating a response to the MoveOn.org Petraeus ad).
|
A
VERY good op piece. Could it be, that the Socialists are so intoxicated with attacking George Bush, that they're really cutting their own throats and not even realizing it? The polls think so. Does the Hildabeast have an "O.J.'s Dream Team" of lawyers on hand, if she loses the election and then goes "crybaby" and sues?
Discuss.
P.S. Mods, if you know how to make that long-ass link any smaller, go ahead (and then let me know). ...stupid NYT.
09-29-2007, 10:03 PM
Hillary Clinton = The "New" Old Al Gore
Linear Mode
