"No nation could preserve its freedom in the midst of continual warfare. " James Madison
"Religion & Government will both exist in greater purity, the less they are mixed together. " James Madison
Economic Left/Right: -1.62
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -4.56
Your random personal attack, which has contributed absolutely nothing positive to your argument, but has in fact weakened it through an ad hominem logical fallacy, has been noted.
Sure they could. If they could demonstrate that they were willing to put up candidates who supported freedom, then the GOP would certainly gain my support.
Please provide proof that it is mathematically impossible for Ron Paul to win the general election in November. If you can't do that, then I will take that as an admission of your defeat.
Who's the one that's throwing around insults rather than engaging in real debate? Your "debate" skills are that of a third grader.
Total fabrication. You're engaging in more logical flaws. You're acting as if intelligence and maturity has something to do with one's age. I know plenty of adults, like you, who act like children. I know plenty of teenagers who can school plenty of adults in a political debate. Age has very little to do with potential knowledge one possesses.
I know plenty of older people who support Ron Paul. Unless you care to back up your wild claim with proof from a credible source that defines being "young" as definitively below a certain cutoff point (the number of seconds one has been alive), and also another credible source that proves that zero people in this country who are older than that number of seconds support Ron Paul. If you're incapable of doing both of those things, I will take that as an admission of your defeat.
More baseless claims. Please provide a credible source to back up this point. If you're incapable of doing that, I will take that as an admission of your defeat.
More baseless claims. You're also using low pay as if one's wages is somehow correlate to their intelligence. That is a typical neo-con elitist attitude. Please provide a credible source to back up this point. If you're incapable of doing that, I will take that as an admission of your defeat.
Collectivist nonsense.
I know plenty of individuals who are young that vote. I know I do.
I know plenty of individuals who are low paid that vote.
I WOULD tell you that I know "least educated" individuals who vote, but I'm not quite sure how it's possible to accurately quantify one's level of education. So this point is just so ignorant that I can't even bring myself to respond to its stupidity.
Paul's supporters are the real conservatives. Those who call themselves conservatives but reject Paul's ideas are what are called "neo-conservatives", or "pseudo-conservatives".
The Godfather of the Tea Party doesn't have support among a libertarian organization that was hijacked by the Republican establishment and converted into a pseudo-conservative, pro-status quo organization? Color me shocked.
More baseless claims. Please provide a credible source to back up this point. If you're incapable of doing that, I will take that as an admission of your defeat.
So you're calling me naive and ineffective. I'd be glad to debate you on any topic of your choice. I'm confident that I will embarass you.
Sure. It's common knowledge that Ron Paul is a registered Republican.
This statement is 100% misleading. Of course he would vote for the GOP if they put up a candidate that supports freedom. It's not that he's not going to vote for the GOP just for the sake of not voting for the GOP; he's not voting for the GOP because all of their other candidates are garbage.
Who cares? Why are you so affixed on the good of the party?
So if Ron Paul loses in the primaries...when the polls show Obama crushing your beloved GOP candidate, according to your logic, the Republicans will be stomping their feat and screaming until they get their way if they don't vote for Obama. Interesting viewpoint.
Or they just grunt and hurl their feces at Paul supporters, like you're doing.
Last edited by Dr. Righteous; Feb 20 2012 at 08:04 AM.
Bookmarks