Page 23 of 29 FirstFirst ... 13192021222324252627 ... LastLast
Results 221 to 230 of 289

Thread: Time for Paul & Gingrich to STEP ASIDE.....

  1. #221

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by PoliticalRuckus View Post
    Went there for a Liberal hippie tree hugging convention that my girlfriends school paid for. She's a professor for child & family development, so free vacation why not? She has family nearby and we went to that BBQ joint in the warehouse district, can't remember the name. It's a nice little quaint city, I enjoyed it.
    Best BBQ is about an hour away in Wilson, NC. It is a place called "BILL'S".
    "No nation could preserve its freedom in the midst of continual warfare. " James Madison

    "Religion & Government will both exist in greater purity, the less they are mixed together. " James Madison

    Economic Left/Right: -1.62
    Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -4.56


  2. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dan40 View Post
    What you and the rest of the cement minded Paulobots
    Your random personal attack, which has contributed absolutely nothing positive to your argument, but has in fact weakened it through an ad hominem logical fallacy, has been noted.

    Quote Originally Posted by Dan40 View Post
    are actually saying is that there is NO WAY the GOP could get your support.
    Sure they could. If they could demonstrate that they were willing to put up candidates who supported freedom, then the GOP would certainly gain my support.

    Quote Originally Posted by Dan40 View Post
    Paul cannot win, PERIOD.
    Please provide proof that it is mathematically impossible for Ron Paul to win the general election in November. If you can't do that, then I will take that as an admission of your defeat.

    Quote Originally Posted by Dan40 View Post
    He has support ONLY with the immaturely
    Who's the one that's throwing around insults rather than engaging in real debate? Your "debate" skills are that of a third grader.

    Quote Originally Posted by Dan40 View Post
    young,
    Total fabrication. You're engaging in more logical flaws. You're acting as if intelligence and maturity has something to do with one's age. I know plenty of adults, like you, who act like children. I know plenty of teenagers who can school plenty of adults in a political debate. Age has very little to do with potential knowledge one possesses.

    I know plenty of older people who support Ron Paul. Unless you care to back up your wild claim with proof from a credible source that defines being "young" as definitively below a certain cutoff point (the number of seconds one has been alive), and also another credible source that proves that zero people in this country who are older than that number of seconds support Ron Paul. If you're incapable of doing both of those things, I will take that as an admission of your defeat.

    Quote Originally Posted by Dan40 View Post
    the least educated
    More baseless claims. Please provide a credible source to back up this point. If you're incapable of doing that, I will take that as an admission of your defeat.

    Quote Originally Posted by Dan40 View Post
    and the lowest paid.
    More baseless claims. You're also using low pay as if one's wages is somehow correlate to their intelligence. That is a typical neo-con elitist attitude. Please provide a credible source to back up this point. If you're incapable of doing that, I will take that as an admission of your defeat.

    Quote Originally Posted by Dan40 View Post
    And NONE of those 3 groups get out and VOTE.
    Collectivist nonsense.
    I know plenty of individuals who are young that vote. I know I do.
    I know plenty of individuals who are low paid that vote.
    I WOULD tell you that I know "least educated" individuals who vote, but I'm not quite sure how it's possible to accurately quantify one's level of education. So this point is just so ignorant that I can't even bring myself to respond to its stupidity.

    Quote Originally Posted by Dan40 View Post
    Paul would have WON in Maine with 2200 total votes. He got less than 2000. He has NO strong support among conservatives.
    Paul's supporters are the real conservatives. Those who call themselves conservatives but reject Paul's ideas are what are called "neo-conservatives", or "pseudo-conservatives".

    Quote Originally Posted by Dan40 View Post
    He has no strong support among the tea party.
    The Godfather of the Tea Party doesn't have support among a libertarian organization that was hijacked by the Republican establishment and converted into a pseudo-conservative, pro-status quo organization? Color me shocked.

    Quote Originally Posted by Dan40 View Post
    He has no strong support among Independents, He has no strong support among moderates.
    More baseless claims. Please provide a credible source to back up this point. If you're incapable of doing that, I will take that as an admission of your defeat.

    Quote Originally Posted by Dan40 View Post
    He has the support of the naive and the ineffective.
    So you're calling me naive and ineffective. I'd be glad to debate you on any topic of your choice. I'm confident that I will embarass you.

    Quote Originally Posted by Dan40 View Post
    Paul IS part of the GOP.
    Sure. It's common knowledge that Ron Paul is a registered Republican.

    Quote Originally Posted by Dan40 View Post
    You will not vote for the GOP.
    This statement is 100% misleading. Of course he would vote for the GOP if they put up a candidate that supports freedom. It's not that he's not going to vote for the GOP just for the sake of not voting for the GOP; he's not voting for the GOP because all of their other candidates are garbage.

    Quote Originally Posted by Dan40 View Post
    How does the GOP deal with nonsensical immature statements like that?
    Who cares? Why are you so affixed on the good of the party?

    Quote Originally Posted by Dan40 View Post
    When you say you're going to stomp your feet and scream until you get your way,
    So if Ron Paul loses in the primaries...when the polls show Obama crushing your beloved GOP candidate, according to your logic, the Republicans will be stomping their feat and screaming until they get their way if they don't vote for Obama. Interesting viewpoint.

    Quote Originally Posted by Dan40 View Post
    sensible ADULTS ignore you.
    Or they just grunt and hurl their feces at Paul supporters, like you're doing.
    Last edited by Dr. Righteous; Feb 20 2012 at 08:04 AM.

  3. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Big George View Post
    Did Ron Paul vote for invading Iraq?
    Ron Paul voted against invading Iraq. Ron Paul voted for pursuing the individuals who committed the September 11th attack within Afghanistan.
    Aggression is always evil.

  4. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AbsoluteVoluntarist View Post
    Ron Paul voted against invading Iraq. Ron Paul voted for pursuing the individuals who committed the September 11th attack within Afghanistan.
    So then, he DID vote for invading Afghanistan?

  5. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Big George View Post
    So then, he DID vote for invading Afghanistan?
    Yes he voted to go after Bin Laden....not to divert into Iraq. He has made his stance quite clear on that. What are you trying to get at?

  6. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Krypt View Post
    Yes he voted to go after Bin Laden....not to divert into Iraq. He has made his stance quite clear on that. What are you trying to get at?
    Bin Laden wasn't killed in Afghanistan, was he?

  7. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Big George View Post
    Bin Laden wasn't killed in Afghanistan, was he?
    No he wasn't. Once again....what are you trying to get at with your posts?

  8. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Krypt View Post
    No he wasn't. Once again....what are you trying to get at with your posts?
    So capturing/killing an international terrorist is not an exact science, is it?

  9. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Big George View Post
    So then, he DID vote for invading Afghanistan?
    He didn't want to invade Afghanistan in the sense of regime change. He wanted a police action in Afghanistan to capture a mass murderer. No one is arguing against self-defense, despite the straw man "isolationist" foolishness.
    Aggression is always evil.

  10. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AbsoluteVoluntarist View Post
    He didn't want to invade Afghanistan in the sense of regime change. He wanted a police action in Afghanistan to capture a mass murderer. No one is arguing against self-defense, despite the straw man "isolationist" foolishness.
    The only reason you refuse to admit that Ron Paul is an Isolationist, is because the Ron Paul Propaganda Machine has TOLD you that he's not an isolationist.

    But not everyone is drinking the same Kool-Aid as all the Ron Paul Zealots.

Page 23 of 29 FirstFirst ... 13192021222324252627 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Ron Paul is Half a Step from First Place / media ignores again
    By Robodoon in forum Political Opinions & Beliefs
    Replies: 40
    Last Post: Feb 20 2012, 09:55 AM
  2. Rand Paul: Ron Paul surging at the right time
    By trucker in forum Current Events
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: Jan 01 2012, 11:20 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks