Political Forum
     

Go Back   Political Forum > General Political Chat > Elections & Campaigns


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 12-02-2007, 07:08 PM
jhffmn jhffmn is offline
Sr. Correspondent
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 475
jhffmn is on a distinguished road
Credits: 2,514
Default xx

They don't need to say anything. Their actions speak louder than words. For the last few decades they have been replacing the American family with government programs. Look up the illegitimacy rates before and after wellfare. Anyway, I am getting tired of debating what is common knowlege.

Here is a good article on the subject.

Quote:
Almost everyone would agree that our most serious social problems are poverty and crime. After all, on which other social problems do we spend more money?

While the proportion of the American population living in poverty has declined somewhat since the advent of President Lyndon Johnson’s so-called "War on Poverty' programs, the decline has come at a huge cost. Over the past four decades, we have spent on social welfare programs an amount approximating our national debt of around $9 trillion. But the cost has been more than just financial.

Particularly disturbing is how the welfare state has driven husbands from the home — especially black homes — by aiding single mothers. Poor women might be poor, but they're not stupid. Neither are poor young men. When they realize that they can get more money from Uncle Sam, single mothers will marry welfare, rather than the fathers of their children. As a result, 70% of black children are now born into fatherless homes.

In effect, through the welfare state, the government releases fathers from their duties to their families. For the rest of us, it increases our duties to total strangers, whose lives we wreck when the government forces us to provide for them. For all practical purposes, the government is saying to poor women, 'You don’t need a man; we’ll take care of you."

While 1996 welfare reform legislation limited the amount of time that women can collect benefits to five years, that has done nothing to reduce the illegitimacy rate. In 1996, 32 percent of all births in the United States were to unmarried women. Over the past decade, that figure has risen to 38 percent.

The first duty in civil society is toward one’s own children. But when males are raised without any expectations that they will have to support their children and marry the mother of their children, they fail to learn the most basic lesson about responsibility.

Unfortunately, anyone who tries to draw attention to the problem, even a Democrat such as Patrick Moynihan, is vilified for doing so. After all, any reference to self reliance and personal responsibility would undermine the argument that blacks are victims of systemic racism.

Ironically, it’s the governmental social welfare system that is undermining the black family, not some pervasive societal racism. In fact, in the name of diversity, colleges and employers are bending over backwards to attract blacks.

Why do Democrats, liberals, and socialists live in denial over the catastrophic consequences of their policies on the American family? Because it’s all about the pursuit of power and control. They seduce us by saying, as Senator Ted Kennedy does, that they are "public servants" rather than politicians. In the end, however, they are really working at being our masters.

And it is important to be clear on this issue: socialism through the welfare state harms everyone equally regardless of race.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Red Cross - Donate Today    Save the Rainforest
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 12-03-2007, 10:17 PM
Seen12345 Seen12345 is offline
Observer
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 20
Seen12345 is on a distinguished road
Credits: 411
Default ...

Quote:
you were challenged to show us where any liberal politician has in any way said that a single parent home is just as good as a two parent home.
Well I think (Please correct if I am wrong) the majority of liberals believe that two moms are just as good as a father and a mother. Does that count?
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 12-03-2007, 10:48 PM
DuH2's Avatar
DuH2 DuH2 is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 9,924
usa
DuH2 has a brilliant futureDuH2 has a brilliant futureDuH2 has a brilliant futureDuH2 has a brilliant futureDuH2 has a brilliant futureDuH2 has a brilliant futureDuH2 has a brilliant futureDuH2 has a brilliant futureDuH2 has a brilliant futureDuH2 has a brilliant futureDuH2 has a brilliant future
Credits: 45,076
Default .

For quite a while now Democrast and Liberals have held a stance that a home regardless of make-up of the family is "good enough".

While its preferable to none at all it is clearly not "good enough"
__________________
McCain 2008
"We make war that we may live in peace"
"...peace is the highest aspiration of the American People. We will negotiate for it, sacrifice for it, we will never surrender for it, now or ever."
"War critics can no longer credibly argue that we are losing in Iraq, so now they argue the war costs too much."
"Oderint dum metuant"
http://members.cox.net/neddy/bobhope_kerfuffles.wmv
http://youtube.com/watch?v=RnfflRNpwKA
http://youtube.com/watch?v=j-QYIP7o2-A
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Sponsored Links

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:39 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0
Template-Modifikationen durch TMS
vBCredits v1.3 ©2007 by Darkwaltz4
Advertisement System V2.1 By   Branden