Thread: The ineffectiveness of Ron Paul

Originally Posted by DA60

Of that, I have NO doubt.

That, as opposed to your glaring ignorance?

I'm also fully aware of what NAMBLA is. So what?

Originally Posted by Big George

That, as opposed to your glaring ignorance?

I'm also fully aware of what NAMBLA is. So what?

Yeah, so do I.

The North American Marlon Brando Look Alike's association.

Originally Posted by DA60

Yeah, so do I.

The North American Marlon Brando Look Alike's association.

Exactly! Brando lives.

Originally Posted by Big George

Exactly! Brando lives.

Whatever Mr. Eurotrash.

Originally Posted by DA60

Whatever Mr. Eurotrash.

Interesting imagination you have.

Originally Posted by Big George

Interesting imagination you have.

Judging by the fact you brought up NAMBLA...yours too.

And somewhat creepy as well.


Anyway, back to the discussion...

Originally Posted by DA60

Judging by the fact you brought up NAMBLA...yours too.

And somewhat creepy as well.


Anyway, back to the discussion...

Think whatever you want. You will anyway.

Originally Posted by Dan40

Because I don't support a 77 year old loser that wasted 3 decades in Congress doing nothing, I have no idea of what is going on in the world?

UnHuh,,,,,Sure, Gotcha.

Only mindless Paulobots know the "truth" All, slightly less than 10% of you know all, the 90+% know nothing. I'll agree that the 90+% are NOT very smart, since they did elect obama. But they ARE smart enough to have NOT elected Paul in 88 or 08 or 12. Even Texans were smart enough to not make him a Senator.

So again, come Nov 7 when there is no Paul anymore, are you going to pitch a tent, trespassing and occupying someone's private property, rejecting their freedom? And for an encore you can take a crap on a cop car and rape a coed.

It would seem to me that the majority, are doing something terribly wrong, and my evidence is irrefutable -

See -

http://www.usdebtclock.org/

Do you see?? stupidty on a mindnumbing scale.

Is it b/c the majority (both Republican and Democrat) endorses that stupidity that you go along?? It's easier to follow the crowd, than it is to stand firm on principle?? Anyone who doesn't go along with the majority is a "Paulbot"; or worse??

Those of us in the minority have no say in how our country is run, and haven't had a say in many, many decades. If we're all a bunch of nuts, what does it matter what we say?? Why is it important to any of you in the majority that you convince us that the course you have charted is hunky dory?? You're going to shout us down, steal our money, steal our freedom, and bomb the rest of the world b/c you feel like it - and there's absolutely nothing those of us in the minority can do to stop you. We certainly have no rule of law to turn to for protection.

This is your show Dan; it is you who supports positive/democratic government. Unfortunately, history provides some pretty gruesome lessons about how that is going to end. Obviously you haven't been exposed to those lessons from antiquity - hence, you are repeating them in glorious fashion.

Originally Posted by Big George

That could ONLY be because you're one of the ignorant young people,

Your random personal attack has been noted. How "mature" of you.

Originally Posted by Big George

who thinks you already know everything.

I think no such thing.

Originally Posted by Big George

So... Are you going to show me where SiliconMagician said Obama legalized drugs, or would you rather just admit that you were lying? It's one or the other.

I never said that SiliconMagician said that Obama legalized drugs.

That's three lies you have engaged in. Lying about what I said is the first lie. Saying I think I know everything is the second lie. And you calling me a liar is the third lie. Why stop there? You're on a roll.

Originally Posted by Dr. Righteous

I never said that SiliconMagician said that Obama legalized drugs.

That's three lies you have engaged in. Lying about what I said is the first lie. Saying I think I know everything is the second lie. And you calling me a liar is the third lie. Why stop there? You're on a roll.

Ahhhh... Clever little bit of obfuscation there. You think you're off the hook for lying, because you phrased your sentence in a certain way.

I guess it depends on what your definition of is is, doesn't it Mr. Clinton?