Thread: The ineffectiveness of Ron Paul

Originally Posted by Razurrrr

*blah blah blah*

Ok, here, let me break it down for you. I will reveal a great secret to you, after which you will be able to easily decode Ron Paul and Alex Jones, et al.

The secret is... everything they are saying is code for... "all of the world's problems are because of the secret cabal of jews who control all the banks and world finance."

That's it. Now, while Ron Paul may be a master of rationalization and theorizing, at bottom that is all the he really stands for. I'm quite sure that if you were talking to him in the private smoking room, down on the horse ranch in Kentucky or wherever, and having a private, candid conversation with him over a glass of rare bourbon, you would definitely hear him say something like "Well, of course it's the jews."

Jews-Fed. Jews-Fed. Fed-Jews. IMF-Fed-Jews. etc etc. That is the core of Ron Pauls philosophy, as well as Alex Jones' paranoia. RP is fundamentally lacking in substantive value, as a politician in the United States circa 2012. But, at least now you can more simply decode his message. You're welcome.

This is elections and campaign section, not conspiracy nut section.

Originally Posted by SiliconMagician

When are people going to realize that "Ron Paul's Constitutionalist Government" would be completely overwhelmed and incapable of operating at all being responsible for the well being of 310 million people and growing.

Our society is much to large, much to complex, much to diverse and much to violent to ever be able to survive a Ron Paul minimalist Government presence. It would be the equivalent of anarchy.

I know its crazy! He wants to go to 2006 spending levels. (*)(*)(*)(*) was it anarchy back then! < Sarcasm>

Ron Paul is so ineffective that neo-conservatives have to keep starting threads to claim how ineffective he is... just like a spurned lover.

Originally Posted by danboy9787

Ive never heard ron paul talk about drugs as a state issue. Sure he pushes more state rights, because apparently unlike you he decided to read the constitution. What I have heard him push is for a complete decriminalization and legalization of all substances. The the states could regulate it however they wish. And sure... I think his son would also make a great leader. Far better than Romney, santorum, gingrich, or Obama.

...and he has dolts like you convinced that he's a constitutional scholar, when the truth is that he just picks and chooses what he likes.

So tell me, boy genius, where in the Constitution it says anything about legalizing, criminalizing and/or decriminalizing drugs?

Originally Posted by Big George

...and he has dolts like you convinced that he's a constitutional scholar, when the truth is that he just picks and chooses what he likes.

So tell me, boy genius, where in the Constitution it says anything about legalizing, criminalizing and/or decriminalizing drugs?

You answered your own question.

Originally Posted by hoytmonger

You answered your own question.

This answer is a PERFECT example of Ron Paulites picking and choosing what they want to believe is constitutional, and what is not.

Originally Posted by Big George

This answer is a PERFECT example of Ron Paulites picking and choosing what they want to believe is constitutional, and what is not.

If its not expressed in the Constitution its left to the states.

You hate facts dont you?

Originally Posted by RP12

If its not expressed in the Constitution its left to the states.

You hate facts dont you?

Hahahahaha! Pick and choose, pick and choose!

Tell me... Why does your savior Ron fly back and forth between Washington DC to Texas? The constitution says NOTHING about that!

Originally Posted by Big George

...and he has dolts like you convinced that he's a constitutional scholar, when the truth is that he just picks and chooses what he likes.

So tell me, boy genius, where in the Constitution it says anything about legalizing, criminalizing and/or decriminalizing drugs?

It DOESNT! So the federal government shouldnt make any law against drugs. No law against drugs means it isn't illegal. Is this really beyond your comprehension?

Originally Posted by Big George

Hahahahaha! Pick and choose, pick and choose!

Tell me... Why does your savior Ron fly back and forth between Washington DC to Texas? The constitution says NOTHING about that!

It says nothing about.... flying? Is that your argument? Man you have a twisted view of the Constitution. Or life. Or something.