
Originally Posted by
sec
The strategy might work if the bloom had not come off of the rose. That is the challenge Axelrod faces. More and more people are now questioning Obama and not simply swooning at everything that he says. The Obama loyalists on this Forum are not the typical American. The loyalists will vote Obama regardless of what he does/doesn't do. Axelrod knows he has those votes locked down.
The statute of limitations on blaming Bush have run out. Also, people know which party was in power in the house and senate the last 2 years of Bush.
Romney is forcing people to think of the terms "Executive" and "leadership". If Axelrod tries to blame Bush it portrays Obama for what he really is, weak, not an executive or a leader.
As much as people might dislike ROmney as the GOP candidate you have a guy who has been
loyal to his wife and family
turned around the Olympic committee
resided over 4.7% unemployment as a governor
ran a successful business and made a success of himself
looks presidential
acts like a confident executive
did well in school
there really are no chinks in the armor which rational people would question him. It really is a challenge to team Axelrod
Wait a minute! obama was a good community organizer and assisted ACORN in voter fraud very well. And he showed up for a lot of votes in Congress, his record of voting "present" proves that.
DON'T BLAME ME, I DIDN'T VOTE FOR THE FOOL! X 2
LIBERALISM,,the new front name for,,,COMMUNISM
TWO people spending ONE person's money, DOES NOT improve the economy!
"Money is better than poverty, even if its just for financial reasons."--Woody Allen
Bookmarks