Thread: Dems Admit Obama’s Not Eligible

Weary of defending in court the Constitutional eligibility of their man at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, the Democrat Party has finally admitted Barack Obama is not qualified to be president of the United States– and that it doesn’t matter.
According to a motion filed by Party attorneys in a Tennessee eligibility lawsuit, “…Defendants [the Tennessee Democrat Party and the Democrat National Committee] assert that the Tennessee Democrat Party has the right to nominate whoever it chooses to run as a candidate, including someone who is not qualified for the office.”
In numerous previous lawsuits questioning the Constitutional eligibility of Barack Hussein Obama, Democrats have maintained that voters, not the Constitution, should be the final arbiters of presidential eligibility. Though a disgraceful assertion on its face, such mindless rambling was about all that desperate Democrat attorneys had in their arsenals, apart from the perpetually employed “plaintiffs lack standing” defense.


But now, the cat is out of the bag, and the true sentiments of Democrat Party officials have finally been aired. It seems that, according to the left, as long as the acting president has the requisite contempt for the United States, is willing to work tirelessly to destroy the national economy, and will ignore both the rule of law and his Constitutional duty to enforce it, he is eminently qualified to hold the country’s top job.


On Wednesday, United States District Judge S. Thomas Anderson joined a long list of robed colleagues, ruling that plaintiffs in the Tennessee case “lacked standing” to point out Obama’s Constitutional ineligibility for the presidency. That is, plaintiffs could not claim sufficient personal harm should the Manchurian Candidate remain in or be re-elected to the White House.
Strange how the law works. After 3 ½ years of cynical disregard for the borders, language, and culture of the United States, one would think that some 240 million people have suffered “sufficient personal harm” to claim legal standing for a crack at His Royal Highness in a court of law! There are only 30 million illegals currently residing in the United States, and those the Attorney General refers to as “his people” might actually lack legal standing in the eyes of an honest arbiter.
At any rate, Democrats have finally admitted what the rest of us have known for quite some time. Barack Obama is NOT qualified to hold the job won for him by the national media in 2008. But it seems only the voters will have the authority to reclaim it from him. God willing, the vast majority who exercise that authority in November will be both American and alive.

http://www.westernjournalism.com/dem...ble-dont-care/

So what if he's not qualified we want him. So what if he is a liar, he's our liar.
Democrats are hypocrites.

Birtherism stopped being cute a long time ago.

Originally Posted by The Real American Thinker

Birtherism stopped being cute a long time ago.

It has never been "cute!" It has been bothersome to liberals and some conservatives, the dim establishment, and the courts who are afraid to properly explore it.

I think it's quite serious and sad that so many voters have likely been duped.

Originally Posted by Slyhunter

http://www.westernjournalism.com/dem...ble-dont-care/

So what if he's not qualified we want him. So what if he is a liar, he's our liar.
Democrats are hypocrites.

Still throwing mud to see if it sticks to the wall?? If you plan on getting your candidate elected based on this I'd suggest you reconsider your strategy.

Slyhunter and OmegaEngima should consider forming a club.

Obnama is a vile creature, not fit to be anything of importance because he is a serial liar. My back is turned on The White House until the day he is gone. To think that people gave him a chance to be decent, but underneath he was the devils spawn. Anyone who has any decency will not vote for him again.

Originally Posted by PatrickT

Slyhunter and OmegaEngima should consider forming a club.

Yes. and they should call it "People that don't have their heads up their asses over obama's lack of eligibility."

Originally Posted by birddog

It has never been "cute!" It has been bothersome to liberals and some conservatives, the dim establishment, and the courts who are afraid to properly explore it.

I think it's quite serious and sad that so many voters have likely been duped.

The courts don't see any merit in the claims because there isn't any. This wingnut wet dream that someone's going to find a smoking gun that proves Obama was born in Kenya and that's going to reverse all he's done in office is sad and pathetic....and making conservatives look like kooks. The reason I reject this as well as all conspiracy crap is that it ends up not being a search for truth, but rather a search for falsehood. When people latch on to an idea, no amount of proof will convince them otherwise. My fidelity is to the truth, and the best evidence is that Obama was born in Hawaii as he claims.

Wow, a birther twisting words to "prove" his own fringe dwelling premise? Shocking!

I WAS surprised that it wasn't a WND link but then I followed the birther bread crumb trail and:

World Nut Daily is actually a division of the Western Journalism Center...lol.

Originally Posted by Slyhunter

http://www.westernjournalism.com/dem...ble-dont-care/

So what if he's not qualified we want him. So what if he is a liar, he's our liar.
Democrats are hypocrites.

Speaking of lies, can you show me where the "Dems Admit Obama's Not Eligible", in your OP or elsewhere?