Political Forum
     

Go Back   Political Forum > General Political Chat > Elections & Campaigns


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 08-02-2004, 07:08 PM
Hansmoleman's Avatar
Hansmoleman Hansmoleman is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Boston, Massachusetts
Posts: 3,281
Hansmoleman is on a distinguished road
Credits: 19,054
Default What Kerry's 'Band of Brothers' Say They Really Think of Him

Posted Aug. 2, 2004

The bizarre effort at the Democratic National Convention to present John Kerry as a hero of the Vietnam War has not been met with universal enthusiasm by those with whom he served. To the contrary. The deep and abiding opposition to Kerry among those who served at the same time and under the same conditions he did, and who knew him in service, long puzzled his biographers. But for years most of these Kerry detractors avoided directly confronting the claims of his left-wing friends that here was a Vietnam War hero worthy of leadership at the highest level. As it became clear that Kerry's candidacy for the highest office in the land would be almost entirely based upon his actions during the four months he served in Vietnam, critics who knew John Kerry during those months have been stepping forward to correct the record. Consider the following, as reported on swiftvets.com.

"During the Vietnam War I was Task Force Commander at An Thoi, and my tour of duty was 13 months, from the end of Tet to the beginning of the Vietnamization of the Navy units.

"Now when I went there right after Tet, I was restricted in my movements. I couldn't go much of anyplace because the Vietcong controlled most of the area. When I left, I could go anywhere I wanted, just about. Commerce was booming, the buses were running, trucks were going, the waterways were filled with sampans with goods going to market, but yet in Kerry's biography he says that our operations were a complete failure. He also mentions a formal conference with me, to try to get more air cover and so on. That conference never happened ..."

-- Capt. Adrian Lonsdale, USCG (Ret.)


"While in Cam Rahn Bay, he trained on several 24-hour indoctrination missions, and one special skimmer operation with my most senior and trusted Lieutenant. The briefing from some members of that crew the morning after revealed that they had not received any enemy fire, and yet Lt.(jg) Kerry informed me of a wound -- he showed me a scratch on his arm and a piece of shrapnel in his hand that appeared to be from one of our own M-79s. It was later reported to me that Lt.(jg) Kerry had fired an M-79, and it had exploded off the adjacent shoreline. I do not recall being advised of any medical treatment, and probably said something like 'Forget it.' He later received a Purple Heart for that scratch, and I have no information as to how or whom.

"Lt.(jg) Kerry was allowed to return to the good old USA after 4 months and a few days in-country, and then he proceeded to betray his former shipmates, calling them criminals who were committing atrocities. Today we are here to tell you that just the opposite is true. Our rules of engagement were quite strict, and the officers and men of Swift often did not even return fire when they were under fire if there was a possibility that innocent people -- fishermen, in a lot of cases -- might be hurt or injured. The rules and the good intentions of the men increased the possibility that we might take friendly casualties."

-- Commander Grant Hibbard, USN (retired)


"I served with these guys. I went on missions with them, and these men served honorably. Up and down the chain of command there was no acquiescence to atrocities. It was not condoned, it did not happen, and it was not reported to me verbally or in writing by any of these men, including Lt.(jg) Kerry.

"In 1971, '72, for almost 18 months, he stood before the television audiences and claimed that the 500,000 men and women in Vietnam, and in combat, were all villains -- there were no heroes. In 2004, one hero from the Vietnam War has appeared, running for President of the United States and Commander-in-Chief. It just galls one to think about it."

-- Captain George Elliott, USN (Ret.)


"My name is Steve Gardner. I served in 1966 and 1967 on my first tour of duty in Vietnam on Swift boats, and I did my second tour in '68 and '69, involved with John Kerry in the last 2 1/2 months of my tour. The John Kerry that I know is not the John Kerry that everybody else is portraying. I served alongside him and behind him, five feet away from him in a gun tub, and watched as he made indecisive moves with our boat, put our boats in jeopardy, put our crews in jeopardy ... if a man like that can't handle that 6-man crew boat, how can you expect him to be our Commander-in-Chief?"

-- Steven Gardner


"I do not believe John Kerry is fit to be Commander-in-Chief of the armed forces of the United States. This is not a political issue. It is a matter of his judgment, truthfulness, reliability, loyalty and trust -- all absolute tenets of command. His biography, Tour of Duty, by Douglas Brinkley, is replete with gross exaggerations, distortions of fact, contradictions and slanderous lies. His contempt for the military and authority is evident by even a most casual review of this biography. He arrived in-country with a strong anti-Vietnam War bias and a self-serving determination to build a foundation for his political future. He was aggressive, but vain and prone to impulsive judgment, often with disregard for specific tactical assignments. He was a 'loose cannon.' In an abbreviated tour of four months and 12 days, and with his specious medals secure, Lt.(jg) Kerry bugged out and began his infamous betrayal of all United States forces in the Vietnam War. That included our soldiers, our marines, our sailors, our coast guardsmen, our airmen, and our POWs. His leadership within the so-called Vietnam Veterans Against the War and testimony before Congress in 1971 charging us with unspeakable atrocities remain an undocumented but nevertheless meticulous stain on the men and women who honorably stayed the course. Senator Kerry is not fit for command."

-- Rear Admiral Roy Hoffman, USN (Ret.), chairman, Swift Boat Veterans for Truth


"We resent very deeply the false war crimes charges he made coming back from Vietnam in 1971 and repeated in the book Tour of Duty. We think those cast an aspersion on all those living and dead, from our unit and other units in Vietnam. We think that he knew he was lying when he made the charges, and we think that they're unsupportable. We intend to bring the truth about that to the American people. We believe, based on our experience with him, that he is totally unfit to be the Commander-in-Chief."

-- John O'Neill, spokesman, Swift Boat Veterans for Truth


"During Lt.(jg) Kerry's tour, he was under my command for two or three specific operations, before his rapid exit. Trust, loyalty and judgment are the key, operative words. His turncoat performance in 1971 in his grubby shirt and his medal-tossing escapade, coupled with his slanderous lines in the recent book portraying us that served, including all POWs and MIAs, as murderous war criminals, I believe, will have a lasting effect on all military veterans and their families.

"Kerry would be described as devious, self-absorbing, manipulative, disdain for authority, disruptive, but the most common phrase that you'd hear is 'requires constant supervision.'"

-- Captain Charles Plumly, USN (Ret.)


"Thirty-five years ago, many of us fell silent when we came back to the stain of sewage that Mr. Kerry had thrown on us, and all of our colleagues who served over there. I don't intend to be silent today or ever again. Our young men and women who are serving deserve no less."

-- Andrew Horne


"In my specific, personal experience in both coastal and river patrols over a 12-month period, I never once saw or heard anything remotely resembling the atrocities described by Senator Kerry. If I had, it would have been my obligation to report them in writing to a higher authority, and I would certainly have done that. If Senator Kerry actually witnessed or participated in these atrocities or, as he described them, 'war crimes,' he was obligated to report them. That he did not until later when it suited his political purposes strikes me as opportunism of the worst kind. That he would malign my service and that of his fellow sailors with no regard for the truth makes him totally unqualified to serve as Commander-in-Chief."

-- Jeffrey Wainscott


"I signed that letter because I, too, felt a deep sense of betrayal that someone who took the same oath of loyalty as I did as an officer in the United States Navy would abandon his group here [points to group photo] to join this group here [points to Vietnam Veterans Against the War protest photo], and come home and attempt to rally the American public against the effort that this group was so valiantly pursuing.

"It is a fact that in the entire Vietnam War we did not lose one major battle. We lost the war at home ... and at home, John Kerry was the Field General."

-- Robert Elder


"My daughters and my wife have read portions of the book Tour of Duty. They wanted to know if I took part in the atrocities described. I do not believe the things that are described happened.

"Let me give you an example. In Brinkley's book, on pages 170 to 171, about something called the 'Bo De massacre' on November 24th of 1968. ... In Kerry's description of the engagement, first he claimed there were 17 servicemen that were wounded. Three of us were wounded. I was the first ..."

-- Joseph Ponder


"Lt. Kerry returned home from the war to make some outrageous statements and allegations ... numerous criminal acts in violation of the law of war were cited by Kerry, disparaging those who had fought with honor in that conflict. Had war crimes been committed by U.S .forces in Vietnam? Yes, but such acts were few and far between. Yet Lt. Kerry [has given] numerous speeches and testimony before Congress inappropriately leading his audiences to believe that what was only an anomaly in the conduct of America's fighting men was an epidemic. Furthermore, he suggested that they were being encouraged to violate the law of war by those within the chain of command.

"Very specific orders, on file at the Vietnam archives at Texas Tech University, were issued by my father [Admiral Elmo Zumwalt] and others in his chain of command instructing subordinates to act responsibly in preserving the life and property of Vietnamese civilians."

-- Lt. Col. James Zumwalt, USMC (Ret.)


"We look at Vietnam ... after all these years it is still languishing in isolated poverty and helplessness and tyranny. This is John Kerry's legacy. I deeply resent John Kerry's using his Swift boat experience, and his betrayal of those who fought there as a stepping-stone to his political ambitions."

-- Barnard Wolff


"In a whole year that I spent patrolling, I didn't see anything like a war crime, an atrocity, anything like that. Time and again I saw American fighting men put themselves in graver danger trying to avoid ... collateral damage.

"When John Kerry returned to the country, he was sworn in front of Congress. And then he told my family -- my parents, my sister, my brother, my neighbors -- he told everyone I knew and everyone I'd ever know that I and my comrades had committed unspeakable atrocities."

-- David Wallace


"I was in An Thoi from June of '68 to June of '69, covering the whole period that John Kerry was there. I operated in every river, in every canal, and every off-shore patrol area in the 4th Corps area, from Cambodia all the way around to the Bo De River. I never saw, even heard of all of these so-called atrocities and things that we were supposed to have done.

"This is not true. We're not standing for it. We want to set the record straight."

-- William Shumadine


"In 1971, when John Kerry spoke out to America, labeling all Vietnam veterans as thugs and murderers, I was shocked and almost brought to my knees, because even though I had served at the same time and same unit, I had never witnessed or participated in any of the events that the Senator had accused us of. I strongly believe that the statements made by the Senator were not only false and inaccurate, but extremely harmful to the United States' efforts in Southeast Asia and the rest of the world. Tragically, some veterans, scorned by the antiwar movement and their allies, retreated to a life of despair and suicide. Two of my crewmates were among them. For that there is no forgiveness. "

-- Richard O'Meara


"I served in Vietnam as a boat officer from June of 1968 to July of 1969. My service was three months in Coastal Division 13 out of Cat Lo, and nine months with Coastal Division 11 based in An Thoi. John Kerry was in An Thoi the same time I was. I'm here today to express the anger I have harbored for over 33 years, about being accused with my fellow shipmates of war atrocities.

"All I can say is when I leave here today, I'm going down to the Wall to tell my two crew members it's not true, and that they and the other 49 Swiftees who are on the Wall were then and are still now the best."

-- Robert Brant


"I never saw, heard of, or participated in any Swift boat crews killing cattle, poisoning crops, or raping and killing civilians as charged by John Kerry, both in his book and in public statements. Since we both operated at the same time, in the same general area, and on the same missions under the same commanders, it is hard to believe his claims of atrocities and poor planning of Sea Lord missions.

"I signed this letter because I feel that he used Swift boat sailors to proclaim his antiwar statements after the war, and now he uses the same Swift boat sailors to support his claims of being a war hero. He cannot have it both ways, and we are here to ask for full disclosure of the proof of his claims."

-- James Steffes
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Red Cross - Donate Today    Save the Rainforest
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 08-02-2004, 07:15 PM
SenaxFlatulus's Avatar
SenaxFlatulus SenaxFlatulus is offline
Site Moderator
Guru
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Indiana
Posts: 8,396
usa us indiana
SenaxFlatulus has much to be proud ofSenaxFlatulus has much to be proud ofSenaxFlatulus has much to be proud ofSenaxFlatulus has much to be proud ofSenaxFlatulus has much to be proud ofSenaxFlatulus has much to be proud ofSenaxFlatulus has much to be proud ofSenaxFlatulus has much to be proud of
Credits: 45,596
Default Thanks Hans

Any minute now the detractors will be posting about how all these statements are false, or part of the "Republican Attack Machine"


Brace yourselves folks here it comes.
__________________
"The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but the heart of the fool to the left."
Ecclesiastes 10:2 (NIV)
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 08-02-2004, 11:11 PM
PJO34's Avatar
PJO34 PJO34 is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 5,010
PJO34 is on a distinguished road
Credits: 34,796
Default .

I saw more than 18 of Kerry's "Band of Brothers" with him in Boston so the most we can say here is that some of Kerry's fellow Vets support him and some do not.

Unfortunately for those who claim that no war atrocities occurred, the war atrocities during the Viet Nam police action are pretty well documented. Maybe these men weren't involved, but that doesn't change the fact that atrocities occurred.

Of course, the REAL atrocities didn't occur until we started illegally bombing Cambodia, but we will leave the issue of war crimes we committed in Cambodia to another thread. Hell, if someone starts a war crime thread, maybe we can talk about how we gave and sold weapons to Indonesia for their genocide of East Timor. Or, we can talk about where Hussein actually got his WMD. I know I am off-topic, but the some of the soldiers seem offended at the thought that the US would commit war crimes and other atrocities, but if you read impartial history records, bad actions on the part of the US are more or less business as usual.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 08-03-2004, 12:38 AM
DBG DBG is offline
Banned
Analyst
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 1,697
DBG is on a distinguished road
Default GOOD POST!

Right on target PJ!!!

Doncha wonder what the neo-con eejits "think" that OLD NEWS from the Repignican band of bros means? (doncha wonder if the HANS eejit just found that document? he usually laps up the whole plate of daily manure, so he should have seen that garbage 100-3000 times already)

I mean, you and I know they don't do a lot of thinking, but what do you imagine their spinmeisters are telling them it's "supposed" to mean?

All I can get out of it is that some people liked Kerry duing the war and others didn't and some did but changed their mind when he came back and joined the anti-war movement and some people didn't like him when at war but did once he got back and joined the anti-war NATION.

Now, obviously the neo-cons can't get through a thought as long as that........so I'm wondering if you can tell what they're being told to think about this - -that every vet hates Kerry?
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 08-03-2004, 05:05 AM
BroncoBilly's Avatar
BroncoBilly BroncoBilly is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: The socialist republic of Kalifornia
Posts: 4,709
BroncoBilly has a brilliant futureBroncoBilly has a brilliant futureBroncoBilly has a brilliant futureBroncoBilly has a brilliant futureBroncoBilly has a brilliant futureBroncoBilly has a brilliant futureBroncoBilly has a brilliant futureBroncoBilly has a brilliant futureBroncoBilly has a brilliant futureBroncoBilly has a brilliant futureBroncoBilly has a brilliant future
Credits: 51,792
Default Fools rush in...

Quote:
Originally Posted by PJO34";p=&quot View Post
I saw more than 18 of Kerry's "Band of Brothers" with him in Boston so the most we can say here is that some of Kerry's fellow Vets support him and some do not.

Unfortunately for those who claim that no war atrocities occurred, the war atrocities during the Viet Nam police action are pretty well documented. Maybe these men weren't involved, but that doesn't change the fact that atrocities occurred.

Of course, the REAL atrocities didn't occur until we started illegally bombing Cambodia, but we will leave the issue of war crimes we committed in Cambodia to another thread. Hell, if someone starts a war crime thread, maybe we can talk about how we gave and sold weapons to Indonesia for their genocide of East Timor. Or, we can talk about where Hussein actually got his WMD. I know I am off-topic, but the some of the soldiers seem offended at the thought that the US would commit war crimes and other atrocities, but if you read impartial history records, bad actions on the part of the US are more or less business as usual.
How do you know those with Kerry were Vets from Viet Nam? You don't, they could have been anybody.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 08-03-2004, 06:04 AM
MUNKO-1970 MUNKO-1970 is offline
Commentator
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,318
MUNKO-1970 is on a distinguished road
Credits: 7,263
Default SPLIT

All this shows is that even the Vietnam Vets are split..Just like the country..

BTW..I am yet to see a "TEXAS AIR NAT'L GUARD BAND OF BROTHERS". Not that it matters...

In any case, most of these guys are upset because of Kerry's position after the war. And they are entitled to it. It was a difficult time (I imagine). It was a tough time back then to stand up against the war. Maybe he was wrong in "accusing" the soldiers of atrocities which he was involved in as well. And that can be debated.

However, I do not see these VETS going for Ann Coulter's "adam's apple" when she ridiculed Max Cleland.

http://www.11alive.com/news/news_art...?storyid=42941

How that woman is not in a 6x10 padded room is beyond me!!
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 08-03-2004, 08:21 AM
raytri's Avatar
raytri raytri is offline
Site Moderator
Guru
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Minnesota
Age: 40
Posts: 16,339
usa us minnesota
raytri has a reputation beyond reputeraytri has a reputation beyond reputeraytri has a reputation beyond reputeraytri has a reputation beyond reputeraytri has a reputation beyond reputeraytri has a reputation beyond reputeraytri has a reputation beyond reputeraytri has a reputation beyond reputeraytri has a reputation beyond reputeraytri has a reputation beyond reputeraytri has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 103,716
Default Yep

I agree, Munko, on both vets and Ann Coulter.

Vets are split. Some will never forgive Kerry for having turned antiwar. That doesn't say a whole lot about his qualifications — or lack thereof — to be president.

To be fair, though, Ann Coulter isn't running for president. A surprising number of Republicans I know hadn't even heard of her until I mentioned her name (maybe I should get a commission if it increases sales of her books.... ) My guess is her profile is higher among partisans on both sides than it is among the general public.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 08-03-2004, 08:28 AM
raytri's Avatar
raytri raytri is offline
Site Moderator
Guru
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Minnesota
Age: 40
Posts: 16,339
usa us minnesota
raytri has a reputation beyond reputeraytri has a reputation beyond reputeraytri has a reputation beyond reputeraytri has a reputation beyond reputeraytri has a reputation beyond reputeraytri has a reputation beyond reputeraytri has a reputation beyond reputeraytri has a reputation beyond reputeraytri has a reputation beyond reputeraytri has a reputation beyond reputeraytri has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 103,716
Default Nonpartisan my backside

Hans,

Not to dispute the vast majority of your quotes, but Swift Boat Veterans for Truth is a GOP front organization.

Here's a repost of something from another thread a month or so ago:

The most notorious anti-Kerry veteran's group, Switt Boat Veterans for Truth, is an example. The link: http://www.salon.com/opinion/conason...ift/index.html

The most relevant parts:

Quote:
Behind the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth are veteran corporate media consultant and Texas Republican activist Merrie Spaeth, who is listed as the group's media contact; eternal Kerry antagonist and Houston attorney John E. O'Neill, law partner of Spaeth's late husband, Tex Lezar; and retired Rear Adm. Roy Hoffman, a cigar-chomping former Vietnam commander once described as "the classic body-count guy" who "wanted hooches destroyed and people killed."

[several paragraphs snipped]

Spaeth's partisanship runs still deeper, as does her history of handling difficult P.R. cases for Republicans. In 1998, for example, she coached Kenneth Starr, the independent counsel, to prepare him for his testimony urging the impeachment of President Clinton before the House Judiciary Committee. She even reviewed videotapes of his previous television appearances to give him pointers about his delivery and demeanor. The man responsible for arranging her advice to Starr was another old friend of her late husband's, Theodore Olson, who was counsel to the right-wing American Spectator when it acted as a front for the dirty-tricks campaign against Clinton known as the Arkansas Project; he is now the solicitor general in the Bush Justice Department. (Olson also happens to be the godfather of Spaeth's daughter.)

In 2000, Spaeth participated in the most subterranean episode of the Republican primary contest when a shadowy group billed as "Republicans for Clean Air" produced television ads falsely attacking the environmental record of Sen. John McCain in California, New York and Ohio. While the identity of those funding the supposedly "independent" ads was carefully hidden, reporters soon learned that Republicans for Clean Air was simply Sam Wyly -- a big Bush contributor and beneficiary of Bush administration decisions in Texas -- and his brother, Charles, another Bush "Pioneer" contributor. (One of the Wyly family's private capital funds, Maverick Capital of Dallas, had been awarded a state contract to invest $90 million for the University of Texas endowment.)
My, that's uplifting. Apparently veterans weren't jumping on the anti-Kerry bandwagon in big enough droves, so some Republican operatives decided to give things a nudge.

Another organization, called Vietnam Veterans Against Kerry, has a similar checkered background.

The link: http://www.salon.com/opinion/conason...0/kerry_smear/

Quote:
A key purveyor of this anti-Kerry propaganda is a former Green Beret named Ted Sampley, who has run a profitable business as a "POW/MIA advocate" from his home in North Carolina for most of the past two decades. Few remember that Sampley was critical to efforts to similarly smear Sen. John McCain, another war hero, when he ran for president against George W. Bush in 2000. Now Sampley has started an organization pointedly calling itself "Vietnam Veterans Against Kerry," which proclaims its determination to ruin Kerry's campaign.

[several paragraphs snipped]

In 1992, Sampley wrote a long article that portrayed McCain as a "Manchurian candidate," who had betrayed America to the North Vietnamese and then enlisted as a secret Communist agent. But it wasn't until seven years later that the celebrated Navy pilot and ex-POW found out how much damage such smears could inflict. After McCain declared his presidential candidacy in 1999, Sampley revived the "Manchurian candidate" smear as a convenient weapon for the Senator's political enemies. Some of them, including the prominent conservative Paul Weyrich and Richard Mellon Scaife's Newsmax Web site, didn't hesitate to pick up the slimy stuff generated by Sampley. The fringe assault on McCain, amplified by the likes of Weyrich and talk radio, caused grave injury to his campaign during the pivotal South Carolina primary.

Insinuations of treason are being revived for deployment against Kerry, who happens to be a close friend of McCain (Kerry defended McCain against Sampley, denouncing him as a "stupid ass" in print).

By the way, here's what McCain says about Sampley:

Quote:
"I strongly caution reporters who may be contacted by or are interested in Mr. Ted Sampley and the various organizations he claims to represent, and his opinions on the subject of Senator Kerry, or any subject for that matter, to investigate thoroughly Mr. Sampley's background and history of spreading outrageous slander and other disreputable behavior before inadvertently lending him or his allegations any credibility."

"I am well familiar with Mr. Sampley, and I know him to be one of the most despicable people I have ever had the misfortune to encounter. I consider him a fraud who preys on the hopes of family members of missing servicemen for his own profit. He is dishonorable, an enemy of the truth, and despite his claims, he does not speak for or represent the views of all but a few veterans. The many veterans I know would think it a disgrace to be considered a comrade or supporter of Ted Sampley."

Like I said, I don't doubt that many veterans oppose Kerry for his antiwar stance. But stuff like this is ridiculous. At least Sampley doesn't appear to be a front for Republican operatives, unlike the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 08-03-2004, 08:29 AM
truebrit truebrit is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,277
truebrit is on a distinguished road
Credits: 12,632
Default How? Because they said they were....

Quote:
Originally Posted by BroncoBilly";p=&quot View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by PJO34";p=&quot View Post
I saw more than 18 of Kerry's "Band of Brothers" with him in Boston so the most we can say here is that some of Kerry's fellow Vets support him and some do not.

Unfortunately for those who claim that no war atrocities occurred, the war atrocities during the Viet Nam police action are pretty well documented. Maybe these men weren't involved, but that doesn't change the fact that atrocities occurred.

Of course, the REAL atrocities didn't occur until we started illegally bombing Cambodia, but we will leave the issue of war crimes we committed in Cambodia to another thread. Hell, if someone starts a war crime thread, maybe we can talk about how we gave and sold weapons to Indonesia for their genocide of East Timor. Or, we can talk about where Hussein actually got his WMD. I know I am off-topic, but the some of the soldiers seem offended at the thought that the US would commit war crimes and other atrocities, but if you read impartial history records, bad actions on the part of the US are more or less business as usual.
How do you know those with Kerry were Vets from Viet Nam? You don't, they could have been anybody.
Do you really think they would lie about something as significant as that?
__________________
The last time this country mixed politics with religion, people got burned at the stake.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 08-03-2004, 08:34 AM
DaShiznit's Avatar
DaShiznit DaShiznit is offline
Correspondent
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 346
DaShiznit is on a distinguished road
Credits: 1,650
Default Come on!

Bronco, if you're going to argue that, how do we know that these guys are legit?
__________________
"The only thing we have to fear is four more years of George W. Bush." -Teddy Kennedy
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Sponsored Links

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:00 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0
Template-Modifikationen durch TMS
vBCredits v1.3 ©2007 by Darkwaltz4
Advertisement System V2.1 By   Branden