Political Forum
     

Go Back   Political Forum > General Political Chat > Elections & Campaigns


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 03-29-2008, 12:57 AM
p-did p-did is offline
Correspondent
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 361
p-did is a jewel in the roughp-did is a jewel in the roughp-did is a jewel in the roughp-did is a jewel in the rough
Credits: 2,802
Default Obama on Foreign Policy Like Reagan and Bush Sr.

From this article:

Quote:
"The truth is that my foreign policy is actually a return to the traditional, bipartisan, realistic foreign policy of George Bush's father, John F. Kennedy, of in some ways Ronald Reagan.

It's George Bush that's been naïve and its people like John McCain and unfortunately some Democrats who have facilitated him acting in these naïve ways that have caused us so much damage in our reputation around the world...

...Obama praised former President Bush’s Gulf war policy, saying that the war was conducted with allies and only cost $20 billion. He said that the Gulf war strengthened the United States because national interests were not compromised.
He has a point: George Bush Sr., like Obama, would not put our young boys life at risk unless the nation in question had missiles aimed at us, which Iraq did not. People like Obama and Bush Sr. look at the cost of an operation before going in head first.

Last edited by p-did; 03-29-2008 at 12:59 AM.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Red Cross - Donate Today    Save the Rainforest
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 03-29-2008, 01:03 AM
Blade Blade is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,965
Blade is a splendid one to beholdBlade is a splendid one to beholdBlade is a splendid one to beholdBlade is a splendid one to beholdBlade is a splendid one to beholdBlade is a splendid one to beholdBlade is a splendid one to behold
Credits: 21,473
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by p-did View Post
From this article:



He has a point: George Bush Sr., like Obama, would not put our young boys life at risk unless the nation in question had missiles aimed at us, which Iraq did not. People like Obama and Bush Sr. look at the cost of an operation before going in head first.

A foreign policy which last had validity back in the early 1800s.
__________________
Blade: "more educated and literate people than Justabubba"

Justabubba: "that would include everyone"

http://politicalforum.com/showthread.php?t=27847
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 03-29-2008, 01:05 AM
p-did p-did is offline
Correspondent
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 361
p-did is a jewel in the roughp-did is a jewel in the roughp-did is a jewel in the roughp-did is a jewel in the rough
Credits: 2,802
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Blade View Post
A foreign policy which last had validity back in the early 1800s.
Thank you for the carefully thought out reply.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 03-29-2008, 01:14 AM
Blade Blade is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,965
Blade is a splendid one to beholdBlade is a splendid one to beholdBlade is a splendid one to beholdBlade is a splendid one to beholdBlade is a splendid one to beholdBlade is a splendid one to beholdBlade is a splendid one to behold
Credits: 21,473
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by p-did View Post
Thank you for the carefully thought out reply.
You get the level of reply your posts deserve, and while that's not much, in your case it would be very educational.
__________________
Blade: "more educated and literate people than Justabubba"

Justabubba: "that would include everyone"

http://politicalforum.com/showthread.php?t=27847
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 03-29-2008, 01:23 AM
p-did p-did is offline
Correspondent
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 361
p-did is a jewel in the roughp-did is a jewel in the roughp-did is a jewel in the roughp-did is a jewel in the rough
Credits: 2,802
Thumbs up

Another intriguing response, sounding well educated indeed.

What are your thoughts on Obama's and Bush Sr.'s strategy of measuring the cost of a decade long invasion, instead of overextending our military, and putting our other interests, and homeland security, in jeopardy?

In retrospect, both Obama and Bush Sr. showed prudence, while the younger Bush showed arrogance, which we're now paying dearly for.

I'm a conservative when it comes to war: meaning I don't believe it wise to jump right in without first studying the impact on our resources.

Last edited by p-did; 03-29-2008 at 01:32 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 03-29-2008, 01:48 AM
DuH2's Avatar
DuH2 DuH2 is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 10,919
usa
DuH2 has a reputation beyond reputeDuH2 has a reputation beyond reputeDuH2 has a reputation beyond reputeDuH2 has a reputation beyond reputeDuH2 has a reputation beyond reputeDuH2 has a reputation beyond reputeDuH2 has a reputation beyond reputeDuH2 has a reputation beyond reputeDuH2 has a reputation beyond reputeDuH2 has a reputation beyond reputeDuH2 has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 49,643
Default

Ironically one of the reasons Bush Sr. lost the election in 1992 was because he didn't remove Saddam Hussein from power. Democrats like to conveniently forget that part and focus soley on the economy as the reason..but even when Clinton had to act against Saddam most people wanted the action to include Saddam Husseins removal from power.
__________________
McCain/Palin 2008
"We make war that we may live in peace"
"Peace is the highest aspiration of the American People. We will negotiate for it, sacrifice for it, we will never surrender for it, now or ever."
"Keep that faith,keep your courage,stick together, stay strong,do not yield,do not flinch,stand up,we're Americans,we'll never surrender they will"
http://members.cox.net/neddy/bobhope_kerfuffles.wmv
http://youtube.com/watch?v=RnfflRNpwKA
http://youtube.com/watch?v=j-QYIP7o2-A

Last edited by DuH2; 03-29-2008 at 01:49 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 03-29-2008, 01:53 AM
p-did p-did is offline
Correspondent
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 361
p-did is a jewel in the roughp-did is a jewel in the roughp-did is a jewel in the roughp-did is a jewel in the rough
Credits: 2,802
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DuH2 View Post
Ironically one of the reasons Bush Sr. lost the election in 1992 was because he didn't remove Saddam Hussein from power. Democrats like to conveniently forget that part and focus soley on the economy as the reason..but even when Clinton had to act against Saddam most people wanted the action to include Saddam Husseins removal from power.
It's a shame, for thousands of young Americans needlessly dead, that Bush Sr.'s son gave in to the pressure to spur this neverending disaster of a war.

Last edited by p-did; 03-29-2008 at 01:54 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 03-29-2008, 02:32 AM
DuH2's Avatar
DuH2 DuH2 is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 10,919
usa
DuH2 has a reputation beyond reputeDuH2 has a reputation beyond reputeDuH2 has a reputation beyond reputeDuH2 has a reputation beyond reputeDuH2 has a reputation beyond reputeDuH2 has a reputation beyond reputeDuH2 has a reputation beyond reputeDuH2 has a reputation beyond reputeDuH2 has a reputation beyond reputeDuH2 has a reputation beyond reputeDuH2 has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 49,643
Default

Only way they will be needlessly dead is for the Democrats betray them and our allies.
__________________
McCain/Palin 2008
"We make war that we may live in peace"
"Peace is the highest aspiration of the American People. We will negotiate for it, sacrifice for it, we will never surrender for it, now or ever."
"Keep that faith,keep your courage,stick together, stay strong,do not yield,do not flinch,stand up,we're Americans,we'll never surrender they will"
http://members.cox.net/neddy/bobhope_kerfuffles.wmv
http://youtube.com/watch?v=RnfflRNpwKA
http://youtube.com/watch?v=j-QYIP7o2-A
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 03-29-2008, 03:05 AM
DuH2's Avatar
DuH2 DuH2 is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 10,919
usa
DuH2 has a reputation beyond reputeDuH2 has a reputation beyond reputeDuH2 has a reputation beyond reputeDuH2 has a reputation beyond reputeDuH2 has a reputation beyond reputeDuH2 has a reputation beyond reputeDuH2 has a reputation beyond reputeDuH2 has a reputation beyond reputeDuH2 has a reputation beyond reputeDuH2 has a reputation beyond reputeDuH2 has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 49,643
Default

Since someoen..golyl I can gues shwo..gave me negative rep for this
Quote:
Ironically one of the reasons Bush Sr. lost the election in 1992 was because he didn't remove Saddam Hussein from power. Democrats like to conveniently forget that part and focus soley on the economy as the reason..but even when Clinton had to act against Saddam most people wanted the action to include Saddam Husseins removal from power.

Enjoy-

Quote:
Monday, Oct. 24, 1994

Quote:
Why not whack Saddam and be done with him? As we should have done last time, right? As even Richard Nixon advised two months after the Gulf War ended in 1991: "If I could find a way to get him out of there, even putting a contract out on him . . . I would be for it." Only Ross Perot is as publicly bold today, but the words "unfinished business" are on almost everyone's lips. From the soldier in the desert to the folks at home, most Americans (72% in the latest TIME/CNN poll) favor using military force to remove Saddam Hussein. The White House too seems on board. If it comes to war, says chief of staff Leon Panetta elliptically, "I can tell you one thing: we're not going to repeat the mistakes of the past."

http://www.time.com/time/magazine/ar...981679,00.html



Quote:
In U.S., Calls Grow Louder for Saddam Hussein's Removal
By Thomas W. Lippman
Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, February 5, 1998; Page A01

....
A Los Angeles Times poll published on Monday showed that by 68 percent to 24 percent, Americans favor airstrikes provided they are designed to remove Saddam Hussein from power, not just force him to accept the commands of the U.N. Security Council.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv...licy020598.htm


Remember all the claims that nobody cared about Saddam back when... he was isolated and all that..yeah..
From 1991-2003 Americans wanted to remove him from power.
9/11 simply made his continued existence unacceptable.
Hillary Ad hits Obama
__________________
McCain/Palin 2008
"We make war that we may live in peace"
"Peace is the highest aspiration of the American People. We will negotiate for it, sacrifice for it, we will never surrender for it, now or ever."
"Keep that faith,keep your courage,stick together, stay strong,do not yield,do not flinch,stand up,we're Americans,we'll never surrender they will"
http://members.cox.net/neddy/bobhope_kerfuffles.wmv
http://youtube.com/watch?v=RnfflRNpwKA
http://youtube.com/watch?v=j-QYIP7o2-A
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AHHHG! Look who Obama has for a foreign policy adviser! Blade Elections & Campaigns 6 03-21-2008 04:09 AM
Clinton vs. Obama on Foreign Policy: RationalLeft Elections & Campaigns 10 03-13-2008 08:07 PM
Hillary goes after Obama on Foreign Policy. DuH2 Elections & Campaigns 9 02-26-2008 08:15 PM
Bush admits U.S. foreign policy was the cause of 9/11 Truth-Bringer Political Opinions & Beliefs 36 01-16-2007 12:58 PM
James Baker leads effort to remake Bush foreign policy raytri Current Events 0 08-21-2006 12:27 PM

Sponsored Links

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:35 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0
Template-Modifikationen durch TMS
vBCredits v1.3 ©2007 by Darkwaltz4
Advertisement System V2.1 By   Branden