Political Forum
     

Go Back   Political Forum > General Political Chat > Elections & Campaigns


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #91 (permalink)  
Old 04-04-2008, 06:29 AM
Rebellion's Avatar
Rebellion Rebellion is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Boston
Posts: 12,225
Rebellion is a splendid one to beholdRebellion is a splendid one to beholdRebellion is a splendid one to beholdRebellion is a splendid one to beholdRebellion is a splendid one to beholdRebellion is a splendid one to beholdRebellion is a splendid one to beholdRebellion is a splendid one to behold
Credits: 66,294
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JMS View Post
i have no problem with those things, personally. if a fetus can survive abortion, its viable and doesnt need to be aborted anyway.
I could live with these laws as a medium.
__________________
JMS gets another English lesson:

Quote:
there is no "mostly unique;" thats like saying "sometimes always," its an oxymoron - its either one or the other.


The result:
Quote:
By the mid-19th century unique had developed a wider meaning, “not typical, unusual,” and it is in this wider sense that it is compared. The comparison of so-called absolutes in senses that are not absolute is standard in all varieties of speech and writing.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Red Cross - Donate Today    Save the Rainforest
  #92 (permalink)  
Old 04-04-2008, 06:34 AM
Rebellion's Avatar
Rebellion Rebellion is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Boston
Posts: 12,225
Rebellion is a splendid one to beholdRebellion is a splendid one to beholdRebellion is a splendid one to beholdRebellion is a splendid one to beholdRebellion is a splendid one to beholdRebellion is a splendid one to beholdRebellion is a splendid one to beholdRebellion is a splendid one to behold
Credits: 66,294
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by raytri View Post
That doesn't make any sense. Again, the number of people using it as anything other than an emergency is tiny.
Sure it does, if you're about to have sex and don't have birth control you don't worry if there is an abortion option. And your stats don't say that those using it other than an emergency is tiny. It refers to repeat abortions, which as a pure number is not tiny.

Quote:
Well, duh. It was illegal before. Everyone pretty much acknowledges that reliable pre-Roe statistics are impossible to come by.
Which proves my point, that if you limited abortion then you would have fewer abortions and more people acting responsibly. Which is exactly what I said before, that your numbers are skewed because if abortion were illegal you would have fewer people seeking them and getting unwanted pregnancies. And of course some of those pregnant would end up keeping their babies.

Point being, you can't just look at the number of abortions and assume that's how many adoptions you need. It would never happen that way because abortions would be fewer for various reasons.
__________________
JMS gets another English lesson:

Quote:
there is no "mostly unique;" thats like saying "sometimes always," its an oxymoron - its either one or the other.


The result:
Quote:
By the mid-19th century unique had developed a wider meaning, “not typical, unusual,” and it is in this wider sense that it is compared. The comparison of so-called absolutes in senses that are not absolute is standard in all varieties of speech and writing.
Reply With Quote
  #93 (permalink)  
Old 04-04-2008, 07:46 AM
raytri's Avatar
raytri raytri is online now
Site Moderator
Guru
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Minnesota
Age: 40
Posts: 15,321
usa us minnesota
raytri has much to be proud ofraytri has much to be proud ofraytri has much to be proud ofraytri has much to be proud ofraytri has much to be proud ofraytri has much to be proud ofraytri has much to be proud ofraytri has much to be proud ofraytri has much to be proud ofraytri has much to be proud of
Credits: 97,237
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rebellion View Post
Sure it does, if you're about to have sex and don't have birth control you don't worry if there is an abortion option. And your stats don't say that those using it other than an emergency is tiny. It refers to repeat abortions, which as a pure number is not tiny.
I seriously doubt a significant portion of people think that way. I know I didn't, when I was young. The availability of abortion wasn't really a factor in my decisions about whom to sleep with, and when.

Quote:
Which proves my point, that if you limited abortion then you would have fewer abortions and more people acting responsibly.
You've managed to turn this around. My point was that banning abortion would result in a huge increase in live births, swamping the number of available adoptive families.

Quote:
Which is exactly what I said before, that your numbers are skewed because if abortion were illegal you would have fewer people seeking them and getting unwanted pregnancies. And of course some of those pregnant would end up keeping their babies.
I'll agree that banning abortion would result in fewer unplanned pregnancies. My point is that the numbers are so out of whack -- abortions outpace adoption by an order of magnitude -- that you'd have to believe that banning abortion would *drastically* reduce the number of unplanned pregnancies in order for the numbers to balance.

I just don't believe that banning abortion will reduce unplanned pregnancies from 1.2 million a year to 120,000 a year.
__________________
Scarred survivor of the April 2008 Mod War.
Reply With Quote
  #94 (permalink)  
Old 04-04-2008, 08:23 AM
JMS's Avatar
JMS JMS is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: California
Posts: 3,728
usa us california
JMS has much to be proud ofJMS has much to be proud ofJMS has much to be proud ofJMS has much to be proud ofJMS has much to be proud ofJMS has much to be proud ofJMS has much to be proud ofJMS has much to be proud ofJMS has much to be proud ofJMS has much to be proud of
Credits: 15,137
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rebellion View Post
I could live with these laws as a medium.
so could i. there you have it!
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by superdude17* View Post
f0ca1 refuses to erase my name from his signature....I believe that b/c I am a member, if I ask for him to remove it, he should. Of course, most normal and sympathetic individuals would have enough common courtesy to respect what other members have asked, but f0ca1 has again and again denied my attempts.
Reply With Quote
  #95 (permalink)  
Old 04-04-2008, 08:50 AM
junjobx2199's Avatar
junjobx2199 junjobx2199 is offline
Sr. Correspondent
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: FLA
Posts: 530
usa us florida
junjobx2199 is a jewel in the roughjunjobx2199 is a jewel in the roughjunjobx2199 is a jewel in the rough
Credits: 3,235
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toby View Post
Liberals want to hold NO ONE Accountable for there actions! A child is NOT A PUNISHMENT! A child is a Blessing! And if someone gets knocked up that baby will be a blessing for someone who cant have one. I could care less if that person does or doesent want that baby! She screwed up "MADE A STUPID MISTAKE " and now its time to face the music! Its just like bailing out homeowners! Liberals dont want to hold anyone accountable for there actions! They want the state to take care of thoes who make mistakes and paid for by thoes of us who dont! Thats rediculous!

You dont work? Thats OK! Our Taxpayers will take care of you!

You didnt read the loan for your mortgage? Thats Ok, the Taxpayers will take care of you!

You "made a mistake" and got pregnant? Dont worry! We will make it legal for you to destroy that child!

You dont have health care? Dont Worry! The Taxpayers will pay for it!
It was more of a statement that he's not against abortion; if you have to super analyze every word that’s said or not said! Liberals want to hold "NO ONE ACCOUNTABLE" are you serious or you just forgot about the pending Impeachment of Chaney , the Ignored cries to find out why Prosecutors were fired for political reasons, How the no bid contracts remain un-fulfilled and the amount of fraud that has been discovered during the oversight of the financial records. Neo-cons want to have free reign is more like it! Answerable to no-one; kind of like Dick&Bush!
Reply With Quote
  #96 (permalink)  
Old 04-04-2008, 10:56 AM
Rebellion's Avatar
Rebellion Rebellion is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Boston
Posts: 12,225
Rebellion is a splendid one to beholdRebellion is a splendid one to beholdRebellion is a splendid one to beholdRebellion is a splendid one to beholdRebellion is a splendid one to beholdRebellion is a splendid one to beholdRebellion is a splendid one to beholdRebellion is a splendid one to behold
Credits: 66,294
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by raytri View Post
I seriously doubt a significant portion of people think that way. I know I didn't, when I was young. The availability of abortion wasn't really a factor in my decisions about whom to sleep with, and when.
I didn't either, but I know some do. My sister's best friend and my cousin are two of them. Anecdotal, but I still believe abortions provide a backstop for other birth control methods which is exactly why the rates have increased since Roe vs Wade.

Quote:
You've managed to turn this around. My point was that banning abortion would result in a huge increase in live births, swamping the number of available adoptive families.
My mistake.

Quote:
I'll agree that banning abortion would result in fewer unplanned pregnancies. My point is that the numbers are so out of whack -- abortions outpace adoption by an order of magnitude -- that you'd have to believe that banning abortion would *drastically* reduce the number of unplanned pregnancies in order for the numbers to balance.

I just don't believe that banning abortion will reduce unplanned pregnancies from 1.2 million a year to 120,000 a year.
I think it would based on history, in 1973 we didn't have huge amounts of kids in foster care versus today. Maybe it was higher, but not to epidemic proportions that using your figures might indicate.
__________________
JMS gets another English lesson:

Quote:
there is no "mostly unique;" thats like saying "sometimes always," its an oxymoron - its either one or the other.


The result:
Quote:
By the mid-19th century unique had developed a wider meaning, “not typical, unusual,” and it is in this wider sense that it is compared. The comparison of so-called absolutes in senses that are not absolute is standard in all varieties of speech and writing.
Reply With Quote
  #97 (permalink)  
Old 04-04-2008, 09:14 PM
PatriotNews's Avatar
PatriotNews PatriotNews is offline
Commentator
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Occupied San Francisco Bay Area
Posts: 1,032
usa us california
PatriotNews is a splendid one to beholdPatriotNews is a splendid one to beholdPatriotNews is a splendid one to beholdPatriotNews is a splendid one to beholdPatriotNews is a splendid one to beholdPatriotNews is a splendid one to beholdPatriotNews is a splendid one to behold
Credits: 5,213
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by junjobx2199 View Post
It was more of a statement that he's not against abortion; if you have to super analyze every word that’s said or not said! Liberals want to hold "NO ONE ACCOUNTABLE" are you serious or you just forgot about the pending Impeachment of Chaney , the Ignored cries to find out why Prosecutors were fired for political reasons, How the no bid contracts remain un-fulfilled and the amount of fraud that has been discovered during the oversight of the financial records. Neo-cons want to have free reign is more like it! Answerable to no-one; kind of like Dick&Bush!
Leaning just far enough to the left to go ov
____________________________________er
______________________________________the
_________________________________________e
__________________________________________d
___________________________________________g
____________________________________________e.



_____________________________________________
__________________
"We should Invade Their Countries, Kill Their Leaders, and Convert Them to Christianity." Ann Coulter
There is a fine line between a subtle nuance and an extreme dichotomy! - PatriotNews
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Fox News steps its game up on Obama's "typical white person" comment! JMS Elections & Campaigns 54 03-22-2008 09:11 AM
"Group" Protests US For Int’l Women’s Day SweetnessBlog Political Blogs 0 03-08-2008 05:50 PM
One last comment about the "mortgage crisis" Blade Current Events 28 01-02-2008 12:13 PM
"Tiller" the "Baby Killer" above Kansas law Sleepy Current Events 14 06-14-2007 07:44 AM
Harold Ford Sr "cracker" comment JP5 Elections & Campaigns 14 10-26-2006 11:04 AM

Sponsored Links

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:18 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0
Template-Modifikationen durch TMS
vBCredits v1.3 ©2007 by Darkwaltz4
Advertisement System V2.1 By   Branden