Political Forum
     

Go Back   Political Forum > General Political Chat > Elections & Campaigns


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31 (permalink)  
Old 08-19-2004, 06:23 PM
SedyAlpha's Avatar
SedyAlpha SedyAlpha is offline
Commentator
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: second front ; Mexico
Posts: 1,091
SedyAlpha is on a distinguished road
Credits: 17,139
Send a message via ICQ to SedyAlpha
Default problem

Quote:
Originally Posted by DBG";p=&quot View Post
Military Documents Contradict Kerry Critic


1 minute ago
WASHINGTON - A Vietnam veteran who claims Sen. John Kerry lied about being under fire during a Mekong Delta engagement that won Kerry a Bronze Star was under constant fire himself during the same skirmish, according to the man's own medal citation, a newspaper reported.

The newly obtained records of Larry Thurlow show that he, like Kerry, won a Bronze Star in the engagement and that Thurlow's citation said he also was under attack, The Washington Post reported Thursday.

Thurlow, also like Kerry, commanded a Navy Swift boat during the Vietnam War. Thurlow swore in an affidavit last month that Kerry was "not under fire" when he rescued Lt. James Rassmann from the Bay Hap River.

Thurlow's records, obtained by the Post under the Freedom of Information Act, include references to "enemy small arms and automatic weapons fire" directed at all five boats in the flotilla that day. In his Bronze Star citation, Thurlow is praised for helping a damaged Swift boat "despite enemy bullets flying about him."

The records said Thurlow's actions "took place under constant enemy small arms fire," which Thurlow ignored in providing immediate assistance to the disabled boat and its crew.
Thurlow is a leading member of Swift Boat Veterans for Truth, a public advocacy group of Vietnam veterans who have aired a television advertisement attacking Kerry's war record.

Kerry has described how his boat came under fire from the river banks after a mine explosion disabled another U.S. Swift boat. Kerry and members of his crew say the firing continued as Kerry leaned over to fish out Rassmann, who was blown overboard in another explosion.
Thurlow described Kerry's Bronze Star citation as "totally fabricated," saying "I never heard a shot."

Thurlow, a registered Republican, said he was angry with Kerry for his anti-war activities after his return to the United States, especially his claim that U.S. troops committed war crimes with the knowledge of their officers up the chain of command.
Thurlow told the Post that he got the award for helping to rescue the boat that was mined.
"This casts doubt on anybody's awards," he said. "It is sickening and disgusting."
He said he believed his own award would be "fraudulent" if it was based on coming under enemy fire.
"We weren't under fire," he insisted, speculating that Kerry could have been the source of at least some of the language used in the citation.

Thurlow said he lost his Bronze Star citation more than 20 years ago. He said he would not authorize release of his military records because he feared the Kerry campaign would discredit him. Members of Kerry's crew have said Kerry is telling the truth. Rassmann said he has vivid memories of enemies firing at him from both banks.
_________________




YOU'VE BEEN HAD, SHEEPLES!!!! WHEN wil lyou people learn to do your homework?



Sorry LIBERTY - I should have been morre clear -as should you have. When I said "they" didn't ask 'w' to censor that ad, but to condemn it, I was not spekaing specifically about MoveOn.org, but the Demo-rat party AND Sen John McCain (R).
When you post a quote from Moveon.org you should not say "liberals", but say the truth.

Well Kerry's condemnation of the liar/vets ad must have really pished off the 'w' people because the Faux & Friends morning show was squirming and writhing and whining and spinning, even to the point of lying trying to sneer at Kerry taking the high ground the 'w' didn't have the cojones to climb up to.

That blond was sputtering and hesitating and SO obviously trying to remember all her "talking points" as she spun/lied off the cuff, oh god it was painful to watch - and I don't even liek her! She referred to the anti-Kerry ad as "people who served with Kerry" (which has already been debunked more than once) and how Kerry called on 527 orgs to be stopped but he's okay with these ads from a 527 (wrong again, on both counts) and that 'Kerry has called for the liar vets ads to be stopped '(yet another lie) and on and on and on..........
All it told me was that evil Karl Rove and his minions were spitting flames and sending orders (talking points - smirk) to try and spin this aroudn backwards so that the idiot-in-chief looks like he's on the high ground instead of Kerry.

Poor Karl...........may he rest in peace.




soon.

I know that peoples personal accounts dont matter but I feel it should. I mean, if it benefits the left it is the truth.. if it is a detriment to the left it is a lie..

right?
military records on many things are not exactly known to be on target or exact.

At the time of this incident, Kerry was an officer in command (OinC) under training. He was aboard the skimmer using the call sign "Robin" on the operation; Schachte, using the call sign "Batman," also was on the skimmer.
After Kerry's M-16 jammed, Kerry picked up an M-79 grenade launcher and fired a grenade too close, causing a tiny piece of shrapnel (one to two centimeters) to barely stick in his arm. Schachte berated Kerry for almost putting someone's eye out.
There was no hostile fire of any kind, nor did Kerry on the way back mention to OinC Mike Voss, who commanded the PCF that towed the skimmer, that he was wounded.
There was no report of hostile fire that day (as would be required), nor do the records at Cam Ranh Bay reveal such hostile fire. No other records reflect hostile fire. There is no casualty report, as would have been required had there actually been a casualty.
http://www.washtimes.com/national/2...21346-4803r.htm



A new Army report exonerates high-ranking Pentagon officials and senior U.S. military commanders from any knowledge or complicity in the Abu Ghraib prison "abuse" scandal. This must come as a great disappointment to Al Gore, who is certain that George Bush was directly responsible. So will the media be reporting all of the good news?


I guess the left will be appoligising to the military and cheney since these are military records....right ??.

__________________
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Red Cross - Donate Today    Save the Rainforest
  #32 (permalink)  
Old 08-19-2004, 06:42 PM
kjs kjs is offline
Sr. Correspondent
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 782
kjs is on a distinguished road
Credits: 6,590
Default President Bush has been attacked continually

I find it very interesting that John Kerry has taken such notable interest in something, "he states", is not true. Charges by the swift boat vets.

In my 51 years, I have never seen a President so viscously attacked. I think there are presently about 20 books out, from anywhere to how Bush lied, the lies that Bush told, the liars of the liars telling the lies. Then moveon.org & their constant attack on George Bush for about 1-1/2 years now. And then the ultimate. Farenheight 9/11.

NEVER ONCE, did President Bush blame John Kerry for this, or make any statement that Kerry had anything to do with them. NEVER ONCE, did President Bush send out a train load of attorney's to block any of the above, "freedom of speech." However, I do clearly remember John Kerry telling his followers, that George Bush should release his military records from the guard. When President Bush was under direct attack for some AWOL charge. He did & it silenced all the critics. John Kerry NEVER apologized for himself or for moveon.org.

John Kerry, too can easily silence these Viet Nam Veterans, by releasing his medical 180 form. To date, he hasn't done that. That would prove what his injuries were with a detailed description of how he got them. Today, was the first day, that he mentioned he received shrapnel, "in his leg". Before, it was thought to be in his behind.

We now know, that Kerry clearly lied about being in Cambodia, on Christmas Eve & Christmas day, 1968. A date that was supposed to be "seared" into his memory. The Kerry campaign is backpedaling again.
Which brings to mind, what else has he lied about.

And now what is really suspicious, is he is all out combating the charge. George Bush, learned something of great value from Ronald Reagan. That is: "if it's not true, ignore it."
Reply With Quote
  #33 (permalink)  
Old 08-19-2004, 06:56 PM
MUNKO-1970 MUNKO-1970 is offline
Commentator
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,318
MUNKO-1970 is on a distinguished road
Credits: 7,262
Default I AGREE..

Quote:
Originally Posted by kjs";p=&quot View Post
I find it very interesting that John Kerry has taken such notable interest in something, "he states", is not true. Charges by the swift boat vets.

In my 51 years, I have never seen a President so viscously attacked. I think there are presently about 20 books out, from anywhere to how Bush lied, the lies that Bush told, the liars of the liars telling the lies. Then moveon.org & their constant attack on George Bush for about 1-1/2 years now. And then the ultimate. Farenheight 9/11.

NEVER ONCE, did President Bush blame John Kerry for this, or make any statement that Kerry had anything to do with them. NEVER ONCE, did President Bush send out a train load of attorney's to block any of the above, "freedom of speech." However, I do clearly remember John Kerry telling his followers, that George Bush should release his military records from the guard. When President Bush was under direct attack for some AWOL charge. He did & it silenced all the critics. John Kerry NEVER apologized for himself or for moveon.org.

John Kerry, too can easily silence these Viet Nam Veterans, by releasing his medical 180 form. To date, he hasn't done that. That would prove what his injuries were with a detailed description of how he got them. Today, was the first day, that he mentioned he received shrapnel, "in his leg". Before, it was thought to be in his behind.

We now know, that Kerry clearly lied about being in Cambodia, on Christmas Eve & Christmas day, 1968. A date that was supposed to be "seared" into his memory. The Kerry campaign is backpedaling again.
Which brings to mind, what else has he lied about.

And now what is really suspicious, is he is all out combating the charge. George Bush, learned something of great value from Ronald Reagan. That is: "if it's not true, ignore it."
Kerry should release the 180 Form and the Prsident should tell us where he was in those 3-4 MONTSH in 1972.. It would clear everything up!!

Bush learned "If its not true, ignore it" from REAGAN? WOW..

Then why did he not apply it to IRAQ and SADDAM? Its not true Saddma "had" WMDs. So why did Bush not "ignore" the "senile old toothless bulldog" Or Reagan's statement does not apply in this case?
Reply With Quote
  #34 (permalink)  
Old 08-20-2004, 04:29 PM
SedyAlpha's Avatar
SedyAlpha SedyAlpha is offline
Commentator
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: second front ; Mexico
Posts: 1,091
SedyAlpha is on a distinguished road
Credits: 17,139
Send a message via ICQ to SedyAlpha
Default just remember

John Kerry himself has now personally spoken out against the Swiftboat Veterans for Truth:

``Over the last week or so, a group called Swift Boat Veterans for Truth has been attacking me. Of course, this group isn't interested in the truth -- and they're not telling the truth,'' Kerry said. ``Here's what you really need to know about them -- they're funded by hundreds of thousands of dollars from a Republican contributor out of Texas. They're a front for the Bush campaign.'' Kerry's evidence? Bob Perry, who has given to given to multiple Republican causes and campaigns (including campaigns for Bush), is the Swiftboat Vet's largest donor, contributing $100,000.

One. Hundered. Thousand.

Big deal.

Let's compare, shall we? Looking at the top forty-nine 527 organizations, we find:http://www.opensecrets.org/527s/527c...l=C&cycle=2004

#1: The Joint Victory Campaign. The sole purpose of this organization is to raise funds for the number two ranked Media Fund and number three ranked America Coming Together. Both organizations are dedicated to defeating Geroge Bush. This organization sports no less than thirty-three individuals who have given more money than Bob Perry, twelve who have given at least one million dollars, with the largest contributor shelling out $7.75 million. George Soros has given more than $4.5 million to this organization.

#2: The Media Fund. This "Anybody but Bush" group has put together and paid for multiple TV ads that play in the battle-ground states. They are funded to the tune of over $28 million, almost half of which comes from the number one ranked Joint Victory Campaign. More than $5.5 million has come from employee unions.

#3: America Coming Together. Also against Bush, also helped by the Joint Victory Campaign, also a baby of George Soros ($5 million) and Peter Lewis (almost $3 million).

#4 & #5: The Service Employees International Union and the American Federationn of State/County/Municiple Employees More than $16 and $13 million respectively. Both are unions and hence partisan Democratic fronts.

Those are just the first five of the forty-nine. More staggering is when we step back and look at the forest, not the trees. Of the top forty-nine 527 organizations:

* Forty one (84%) are supported by Democrats and push Democrat causes.

* Only five are supported by Republicans and push Republican causes.

* Three are issue or industry oriented (like Peter Lewis' Marijuana Policy Project).

* The Democrat funding totals $176 million compared to the Republican total of $10.8 million.

By Kerry's measure, each of the organizations that support Democrat causes are "Democrat front groups." John Kerry only objects when a 527 organization slams him. President George Bush objects to it all, which begs the question, "Is this really a fight John Kerry wants to have?" Thursday, August 19, 2004
http://www.publicintegrity.org/527/i...essiveBoss.png
Reply With Quote
  #35 (permalink)  
Old 08-21-2004, 05:20 AM
ThereseM ThereseM is offline
Commentator
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,569
ThereseM is on a distinguished road
Credits: 8,374
Default Repiglicans???

Quote:
Originally Posted by MarkH";p=&quot View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Livefrmtx";p=&quot View Post
Liberals want to silence veterans.

This, in and of itself, speaks for itself.
Repiglicans who want to silence everyone.
I looked that up in Webster's dictionary. It's not in there. Is this your way of making an argument? I guess you'll never be able to make any arguments because you make up words to insult people you don't even know. Why must you call names and rewrite words to get your point across? It hasn't worked so far. Kerry is starting to lose his composure.

And no one called for any censorship when Dick Clark came out with his book, Michael Moore came out with his movie. It's the people who hate George Bush that want to censor. As a matter of fact the charge that Bush was AWOL was so ridiculous, Bush didn't even dignify it with an answer. Hasn't hurt him a bit since he is not running on any military service, like your boy, you know, the one who spent Christman eve in Cambodia, oh yeah, that's right he was never in Cambodia, he misspoke.
__________________
Those who think they know everything, usually know the least.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Sponsored Links

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:03 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0
Template-Modifikationen durch TMS
vBCredits v1.3 ©2007 by Darkwaltz4
Advertisement System V2.1 By   Branden