![]() |
|
||||
|
Because I'm from Illinois and am well aware of his policies
__________________
For real coverage of the Iraq war see http://michaelyon-online.com/ "In the first place we should insist that if the immigrant who comes here in good faith becomes an American and assimilates himself to us, he shall be treated on an exact equality with everyone else, for it is an outrage to discriminate against any such man because of creed, or birthplace, or origin. But this is predicated upon the man’s becoming in very fact an American, and nothing but an American…" |
|
||||
|
Surrender Appease Tax
![]() .
__________________
"We make war that we may live in peace" "...peace is the highest aspiration of the American People. We will negotiate for it, sacrifice for it, we will never surrender for it, now or ever." "War critics can no longer credibly argue that we are losing in Iraq, so now they argue the war costs too much." "Oderint dum metuant" http://members.cox.net/neddy/bobhope_kerfuffles.wmv http://youtube.com/watch?v=RnfflRNpwKA http://youtube.com/watch?v=j-QYIP7o2-A Last edited by DuH2; 05-04-2008 at 06:00 PM. |
|
||||
|
I disagree with him on so many things, it's hard to narrow it down. Two things stand out for me.
I believe he is utterly ignorant and naive on everything having to do with foreign policy, the military and national security. I can't find even the tiniest aspect of any of those things I can agree with him on. His economic policy relies solely on class warfare, IMO. Witness his capital gains stupidity. His words only impress the ignorant.
__________________
Order without liberty and liberty without order are equally destructive. - Theodore Roosevelt |
|
||||
|
He is a demagogue. He wants to establish an authoritarian state where no one is poor, no matter how lazy, where everyone has healthcare, regardless of whether or not they want to pay for it. He is a populist, and tells what people want (such as hope) so that he can get elected, regardless of whether what he says is true. He is a socialist, and has openly admitted to wanting to ruin the economy "for the purpose of fairness." He wants your money. He's anti-American. Hamas openly supports him. His economic policies are not policies, they're attempts to get elected. He wants people to be dependent on the government for their wellbeing so that they will continue to support his regime and won't elect him out of office. Basically, he is a multi-culturist, anti-militant, internationalist Hitler, and someone try to prove me wrong.
__________________
The White Fox Uncertainty Principle states that: You can never know the position of a liberal and the logic behind it at the same time, because the closer you get to finding one, the more unknown the other one becomes. |
|
||||
|
Quote:
He is unpatriotic, even anti-patriotic. He has never served one day in the military. I prefer veterans. He belonged to a racist church, an anti-white church, an anti-American church, an anti-Semitic church as well as a pro-muslim, pro-Hamas church for twenty years, and didn't notice it until FOXNews pointed it out to him. He associates with known terrorists unapologetically. His Father was anti-American, his step-father was anti-American, and his mother was anti-American, so is it any wonder why he is anti-American? His wife is anti-American, and was never proud of her country until recently. His is the son of a muslim and associates with and has connection to the Nation of Islam. He is a closet drug user and possibly homosexual. He thinks white people "cling" to their guns and their religion. Other than the above mentioned problems and several other unmentioned ones, I don't agree with him on any of the issues, and he is and was the most inexperienced candidates the democrats offered up, and the democrats chose him because they thought it would be cute to go with the black guy this time so they could demonstrate the diversity of their thinking and wanted to prove this time they are not racists at all. See! They are not racists! They voted for the black guy over the Mexican, the woman and the Jew!
__________________
"We should Invade Their Countries, Kill Their Leaders, and Convert Them to Christianity." Ann Coulter There is a fine line between a subtle nuance and an extreme dichotomy! - PatriotNews Last edited by PatriotNews; 05-04-2008 at 09:24 PM. |
|
|||
|
Quote:
That being said, you're a minority, and people like you never change their mind and will never decide an election. Last edited by Andaras; 05-04-2008 at 10:36 PM. |
|
|||
|
Quote:
Well in America, we would like our government to be "of the people, by the people, for the people", (Abraham Lincoln) but it isn't. We would like our government to "derive their just powers from the consent of the governed" (Declaration of Independence), but they don't. We would like government to be "wise and frugal" (Thomas Jefferson), but it is neither. We believe that "The Constitution is not an instrument for the government to restrain the people, it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government -- lest it come to dominate our lives and interests" (Patrick Henry), but government doesn't agree. We believe that people should "Ask not what your country can do for you; ask what you can do for your country." (J. F. Kennedy), but instead the government has dished out so much candy lately by mortgaging everyone's future that this principle has been lost. We also know that "Any man who wants to be president is either an egomaniac or crazy." (Eisenhower), so naturally we are worried about who will be in charge of our government, because it certainly won't be "the people." We don't hate the idea of government, just how a lot of it is being run. Most Americans, and I think rightly so, see our government as corrupt, inept, disfunctional, and ignorant, with a short-term mindset. |
|
|||
|
Quote:
It seems that most of the GOP-heads (not that every who supports McCain is a GOP head, but those who post nothing but hate and over-simplifications like "he's a appeasing communist" represent the typical GOP-state-of-mind) fail to understand that we created a government for a reason. If you strip all of its power, you have anarchy. While pure socialism clearly does not work, neither does pure capitalism (unless you want all of our cities to be like Bangkok). The problem with the GOP is that they want to use government power to take away our rights (right to choose your medicine, get married to whoever you want, have a private phone call, etc), while I want a government that is dedicated to preserving our rights and expanding our freedom. While McCain represents that same old GOP freedom-repression-style of government, Obama is more likely to give our states and cities the right to make their own decisions. And anybody who thinks Obama will pull back the troops rapidly is smoking something. He will consult his generals, and bring them out at a rate that is safe for keeping Iraq secure until they have built forces to protect their own government.
__________________
Winner of the Post of the Week award: Quote:
Last edited by p-did; 05-05-2008 at 12:28 AM. |
|
|||
|
Quote:
Intolerance isn't that. Last edited by BigRed; 05-05-2008 at 02:10 AM. |
![]() |
| Bookmarks | ||||||
Digg
|
del.icio.us
|
StumbleUpon
|
Google
|
Yahoo
|
Furl
|
Reddit
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| A question to anti-communists | Guevara | Political Science | 50 | 05-05-2008 07:34 AM |
| Does the Washington Post (and/or others) PAY the Enemy to write Anti-American/Anti-Is | DiscerningBlog | Political Blogs | 1 | 04-24-2008 09:48 PM |
| Are you anti-Obama, anti-Hillary, or anti-Democrat? | bostonjc | Political Opinions & Beliefs | 51 | 03-20-2008 04:20 PM |
| Dems question latest anti-war strategy | MRMAGQQ | United States | 18 | 11-10-2007 05:09 PM |
| Another hypothetical question for anti-war persons. | Jake | Political Opinions & Beliefs | 45 | 01-21-2007 10:29 PM |