Wow, your evidence by way of the video is possibly the most unbiased piece of journalism I've seen since the Horton Ads in 1988.

So, because Obama and Khalidi both used the word 'sore' to describe the problems in the Palestinian-Israeli Conflict, that necessarily means that Khalidi is influencing Obama? Couldn't be a mere coincidence, could it?

Well, McCain has used the word 'terrorist' to describe certain extremist, radical groups throughout the word. And, low and behold, Obama has used the same word to describe them. This of course shows that McCain is influencing Obama's campaign.

But why stop there? Several times different individuals have used the same word to describe the same situation. Let's apply their philosophies to every single person who has also used the same word to describe the same situation.

You yourself said that 'Hamas Loves Obama'. Well, according to an article in YNetNews.com , Ahmed Yusuf, a spokesperson for Hamas states that "Hamas Loves Obama", too. You both used the exact same rhetoric to describe the exact same person. You must believe the exact same things as Ahmed.

Isn't logic fun?

Besides, is it any coincidence that Hamas would support the candidate that wants to end the American Occupancy of the Middle East? Do you have any evidence that demonstrates that Obama does in fact truly support extremist activities, other than factions supporting him that he himself does not support? If the KKK were to support McCain, even though McCain doesn't support the KKK, does that mean that McCain must then also be racist? In the world of logic, we call that the Bad Company Fallacy.

Here's an example. Hitler supported conservation movements. Hitler was a bad person, therefore, anyone who also supports conservation movements are also bad people. McCain supports conservation movements, therefore, McCain must also be a bad person.

__________________
A [person] has a property in [their] opinions and the free communication of them. -James Madison

So strong is this propensity of [humanity] to fall into mutual animosities, that where no substantial occasion presents itself, the most frivolous and fanciful distinctions have been sufficient to kindle their unfriendly passions and excite their most violent conflicts -James Madison, Federalist Paper No. 10

James Madison for President -White Fox

Hamas has endorsed Obama. Hadn't you heard?


Choosy terrorists, choose Obama!

That's good!! Cause I like Hamas!!!!

are you on a terror watch list yet?

Hamas hasn't done anything to the United States.

So why are you against them?

Is there a Terrorist that doesn't like Obama?

No.

__________________
McCain/Palin 2008
"We make war that we may live in peace"
"Peace is the highest aspiration of the American People. We will negotiate for it, sacrifice for it, we will never surrender for it, now or ever."
"Keep that faith,keep your courage,stick together, stay strong,do not yield,do not flinch,stand up,we're Americans,we'll never surrender they will"
http://members.cox.net/neddy/bobhope_kerfuffles.wmv
http://youtube.com/watch?v=RnfflRNpwKA
http://youtube.com/watch?v=j-QYIP7o2-A

Hamas is a legal political party of the Palestinian people. They won several seats in a free democratic election.

so did the Democrats

What??????