For someone who actually is curious, here's the info for you to put together.

http://www.legistorm.com/member/69/Sen_John_McCain.html

http://www.legistorm.com/member/76/S...ack_Obama.html

I'm curious myself, but I don't have time now.

__________________
"Government exists to protect us from each other. Where government has gone beyond its limits is in deciding to protect us from ourselves." ~Ronald Reagan

Good find!

Obama is not about change, but he pays his females with change.

Starting to dig through it, but the most obviously relevant bit is this:

And, of course, there's no indication whether the person was employed full-time, etc.

__________________
Man up.

Odd that the same rules would apply for McCain, yet his females are paid higher, eh?

You can click on the time period to narrow it down. It's not hard to figure out. Just looking at the job titles and salaries from 04/01/07 - 09/30/07 for Barack looks bad though. Really bad. The weird thing is that the feminazis won't care. They're lefties based on feeling, not reason.

__________________
"Government exists to protect us from each other. Where government has gone beyond its limits is in deciding to protect us from ourselves." ~Ronald Reagan

With libs it's not what they do, it's what they say that matters.

But they're not.

I took McCain's numbers for 10/1/06-3/31/07, and dropped them into an excel spreadsheet. Following the rules cited by CNS, I eliminated interns and anyone paid an annual salary of less than $23,000 (meaning a six-month salary of less than $12,500).

McCain also had an office manager quit halfway through, and replaced her with another woman. That would have the effect of exaggerating the female headcount while reducing the average female salary. So I combined them into one entry, which reflects the gender and full pay of the slot.

Further, two of the men -- Mark Salter and Christopher Paul -- didn't work the full term, which has the effect of reducing the average men's salary. Rather than do math that could be disputed, I ignored that.

The results:

24 women, paid an average of $26,634.82.
15 men, paid an average of $31,240.35.

Now I'll look at Obama.

__________________
Man up.

Obama's numbers:

He had more people. He also had eight people (two women, six men) who didn't work the full six months. Again, I ignored this. I can do the math if someone wants to make a point of it.

The results:

20 women, paid an average of $25,173.97.

30 men, paid an average of $32,091.98.

I don't see a significant difference between the two offices. And even if there were, you'd have to drill down further and look at schedules, job duties, bonuses, etc. to determine how pay really shook out.

__________________
Man up.

Wow, you should call the Secretary of the Senate, and tell them you are smarter than they are!

You're just upset that he proved your smear tactic wrong.

__________________